We performed a comparison between HPE System Management and Oracle Enterprise Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Microsoft, ServiceNow and others in Server Monitoring."This solution has improved our organization through the provision of efficient resource utilization and capacity planning."
"This is a good product and I recommend it."
"The product's initial setup phase is easy with the help of the framework consisting of Microsoft Azure."
"The interface is in continuous development and improves version by version."
"I think it's stable, scalable, and flexible."
"The managing and monitoring are the solution's most valuable features. They are something I find quite helpful in my work."
"I have found the uptime of all of our systems to be most valuable with this solution. This is important because we need to guarantee specific uptime and preventive maintenance. We need to know upfront if there are going to be any issues on the database so we can proactively solve those."
"The product gives us as much control as we can have by providing a complete picture of the whole set of Oracle products."
"It's user friendly."
"This solution allows us to quickly drill down when there are issues."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager has eased the responsibilities among our DBAs. We can now assign individual tasks to separate DBAs."
"We use it extensively for performance tuning testing, monitoring, and configuration."
"The single-pane and single interface in the centralized system is the most valuable feature."
"The best part is the efficient database performance monitoring and the ability to take actions directly from there."
"Our customers would like to see the price lowered."
"I think that support integration could be improved."
"The quality of service and support for this solution needs to be improved."
"The product should increase the processing capacity and allow speedy deployment, as both of them are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"The return on investment report is too difficult to understand."
"If the solution could provide better integration to make it easier to manage everything on different servers, that would be helpful. Whatever servers a company has, be it IBM, Dell, etc., if the System Management could be a platform that links all of them together, it would make management across different server types easier."
"Improving the integration speed would be beneficial, as the current Java-based system can sometimes result in slow responses."
"We have encountered performance issues when the load is huge."
"We could use it but definitely with some effort we can streamline much better and sometimes some box here and there, like 13C you have to really wait, but there are great features. Just have to make sure it is a stable product."
"There's a lot of documentation to go through as a new user."
"Patching. It's extremely difficult to determine what requires patching and the process to patch each component is slightly different."
"I rate Oracle Enterprise Manager six out of 10 for affordability. It's expensive."
"I feel more dashboards can be added, especially those useful to higher levels of IT management."
"The solution is not as simple as people say it is."
HPE System Management is ranked 19th in Server Monitoring with 8 reviews while Oracle Enterprise Manager is ranked 4th in Server Monitoring with 123 reviews. HPE System Management is rated 8.2, while Oracle Enterprise Manager is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of HPE System Management writes " Offers reliability and helps with the virtualization part". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Manager writes "Provides good stability and has an easy implementation process". HPE System Management is most compared with Lenovo XClarity Controller, Zabbix, Microsoft Configuration Manager and Tanium, whereas Oracle Enterprise Manager is most compared with Zabbix, Quest Spotlight, Dynatrace, AppDynamics and Quest Foglight for Databases.
See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
