Compare Huawei FusionCube Hyper-Converged Infrastructure vs. Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Find out what your peers are saying about Huawei FusionCube Hyper-Converged Infrastructure vs. Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
455,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The product is very reliable. We haven't had any major issues with the product since we bought it.""The solution is stable and everything is taken care of through the Huawei support center. They ensure everything is running smoothly. It's been very good.""The pricing of the solution is excellent. It's one of the main reasons a customer chooses Huawei. It's much, much better than VMware."

More Huawei FusionCube Hyper-Converged Infrastructure Pros »

"The size of the hardware is what we need because it is very good for small configurations.""The most useful feature is the solution's automation in terms of how we are able to spin up a certain workload in real-time when we are doing R&D.""Both the scalability and stability of this solution are excellent.""The consolidation of the management in one control point is the most valuable. The whole infrastructure management is consolidated in just one console point. The documentation is also pretty good.""It is stable and scalable."

More Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure Pros »

Cons
"The solution currently does not have cloud integration.""t would be helpful if the solution was able to collaborate or integrate with other well-known monitoring tools. Right now, you have to work hard to get it configured. It would be a good selling point for them if they could open up their solution to more integrations.""Technical support needs improvement. There's a lot of language barriers."

More Huawei FusionCube Hyper-Converged Infrastructure Cons »

"This product is not so stable. Maybe it is just not mature enough in its development.""The licensing policy needs to be improved. They have a licensing policy based on the number of CPU sockets. Nowadays what has happened is that the license they are trying to move is based on the number of CPU cores. With the advancement in technology there are now more cores in a single CPU. It's been very challenging in terms of managing the license around everything. Today we have a processor with 24 and 32 cores on the same physical CPU.""The cloud deployment could be improved.""It is not user-friendly, and it is very difficult to operate. You have to have a deep understanding of the technical details of the infrastructure to implement it. When you compare it with VMware, it is totally different because the graphical user interface is not that easy to understand. It is not intuitive. To use it, you have to read a lot of documentation and even understand what is going on behind the solution. It is not for someone who has a little bit of knowledge. Currently, it is too complex. I need something that is easy to implement. It should have a basic configuration as well as a complex configuration.""The main issue is the initial investment. It is an expensive product, and it should be cheaper. It should also be easier to use and manage. The professional service for this solution is quite complex and expensive."

More Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure is an open-sourced, low-cost solution with full features.""It is quite pricey."

More Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Hyper-Converged (HCI) solutions are best for your needs.
455,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The pricing of the solution is excellent. It's one of the main reasons a customer chooses Huawei. It's much, much better than VMware.
Top Answer: The solution is less expensive than most competitors, including Cisco.
Top Answer: The stability is poor as compared to VMware. It's a big issue for the customers as well. In our last two to three deployments we were having some issues with the hardware side. Huawei always offers… more »
Top Answer: The most useful feature is the solution's automation in terms of how we are able to spin up a certain workload in real-time when we are doing R&D.
Top Answer: The licensing policy needs to be improved. They have a licensing policy based on the number of CPU sockets. Nowadays what has happened is that the license they are trying to move is based on the… more »
Top Answer: We use the solution as a part of our in-house use in our R&D department. We use it mainly as a desktop as a service.
Ranking
20th
Views
2,087
Comparisons
1,668
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
486
Rating
7.0
14th
Views
621
Comparisons
262
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
527
Rating
9.5
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
FusionCube 6000, FusionCube 6000C, FusionCube 2000, FusionCube Virtual SAN-Ready NodesRed Hat HCI, Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure for Virtualization
Learn
Huawei
Red Hat
Overview

Huawei FusionCube is a hyper-converged infrastructure, which consists of computing, storage, network, virtualization, and management systems.

Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure - based on our leading OpenStack and virtualization platforms - provides co-located, scalable, software-defined compute and storage, driven by Red Hat Ansible Automation on economical, industry-standard hardware.

Offer
Learn more about Huawei FusionCube Hyper-Converged Infrastructure
Learn more about Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider43%
Computer Software Company23%
Government5%
Media Company4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider38%
Computer Software Company34%
Media Company7%
Government4%
Find out what your peers are saying about Huawei FusionCube Hyper-Converged Infrastructure vs. Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
455,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Huawei FusionCube Hyper-Converged Infrastructure is ranked 20th in Hyper-Converged (HCI) with 3 reviews while Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure is ranked 14th in Hyper-Converged (HCI) with 5 reviews. Huawei FusionCube Hyper-Converged Infrastructure is rated 7.0, while Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Huawei FusionCube Hyper-Converged Infrastructure writes "Good functionality and pricing but needs better security". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure writes "Comes in a small, compact model that does not have any separate management but it is not so stable". Huawei FusionCube Hyper-Converged Infrastructure is most compared with VMware vSAN, Nutanix Acropolis AOS, VxRail, Sangfor HCI and HPE SimpliVity, whereas Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure is most compared with Sangfor HCI, HPE SimpliVity, Dell EMC PowerFlex, Cisco HyperFlex HX-Series and VMware vSAN. See our Huawei FusionCube Hyper-Converged Infrastructure vs. Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure report.

See our list of best Hyper-Converged (HCI) vendors.

We monitor all Hyper-Converged (HCI) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.