We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure Pros and Cons

Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure Pros

ML
System Architect at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees
The size of the hardware is what we need because it is very good for small configurations.
View full review »
Head SDWAN SBU at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The most useful feature is the solution's automation in terms of how we are able to spin up a certain workload in real-time when we are doing R&D.
View full review »
Senior IT Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
The consolidation of the management in one control point is the most valuable. The whole infrastructure management is consolidated in just one console point. The documentation is also pretty good.
View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Sangfor, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Hyper-Converged (HCI). Updated: October 2021.
542,029 professionals have used our research since 2012.
AM
Product Manager at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
It is stable and scalable.
View full review »
RA
Senior Product Manager at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
Both the scalability and stability of this solution are excellent.
View full review »

Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure Cons

ML
System Architect at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees
This product is not so stable. Maybe it is just not mature enough in its development.
View full review »
Head SDWAN SBU at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The licensing policy needs to be improved. They have a licensing policy based on the number of CPU sockets. Nowadays what has happened is that the license they are trying to move is based on the number of CPU cores. With the advancement in technology there are now more cores in a single CPU. It's been very challenging in terms of managing the license around everything. Today we have a processor with 24 and 32 cores on the same physical CPU.
View full review »
Senior IT Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
It is not user-friendly, and it is very difficult to operate. You have to have a deep understanding of the technical details of the infrastructure to implement it. When you compare it with VMware, it is totally different because the graphical user interface is not that easy to understand. It is not intuitive. To use it, you have to read a lot of documentation and even understand what is going on behind the solution. It is not for someone who has a little bit of knowledge. Currently, it is too complex. I need something that is easy to implement. It should have a basic configuration as well as a complex configuration.
View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Sangfor, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Hyper-Converged (HCI). Updated: October 2021.
542,029 professionals have used our research since 2012.
AM
Product Manager at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
The main issue is the initial investment. It is an expensive product, and it should be cheaper. It should also be easier to use and manage. The professional service for this solution is quite complex and expensive.
View full review »
RA
Senior Product Manager at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
The cloud deployment could be improved.
View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Sangfor, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Hyper-Converged (HCI). Updated: October 2021.
542,029 professionals have used our research since 2012.