Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure Pros and Cons

Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure Pros

systemar777972
System Architect at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees
The size of the hardware is what we need because it is very good for small configurations.
View full review »
AmitPrasad
Head SDWAN SBU at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The most useful feature is the solution's automation in terms of how we are able to spin up a certain workload in real-time when we are doing R&D.
View full review »
reviewer1279482
Senior Product Manager at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
Both the scalability and stability of this solution are excellent.
View full review »

Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure Cons

systemar777972
System Architect at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees
This product is not so stable. Maybe it is just not mature enough in its development.
View full review »
AmitPrasad
Head SDWAN SBU at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The licensing policy needs to be improved. They have a licensing policy based on the number of CPU sockets. Nowadays what has happened is that the license they are trying to move is based on the number of CPU cores. With the advancement in technology there are now more cores in a single CPU. It's been very challenging in terms of managing the license around everything. Today we have a processor with 24 and 32 cores on the same physical CPU.
View full review »
reviewer1279482
Senior Product Manager at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
The cloud deployment could be improved.
View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Sangfor, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Hyper-Converged (HCI). Updated: October 2020.
441,726 professionals have used our research since 2012.