Compare IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence vs. NetIQ Identity Governance
Sponsored | ||
 |
Most Helpful Review | ||||
Use IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence? Share your opinion. |
| |||
 Find out what your peers are saying about One Identity, SailPoint, Microsoft and others in Identity Management (IM). Updated: January 2021. 456,966 professionals have used our research since 2012. | ||||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros | ||
"The most valuable feature is the automatic provisioning and reconciliation of things like the Active Directory groups and memberships." "The most valuable aspect of the product is that it is Microsoft-based and it supports all Microsoft technology." "Our customers have benefited from Omada Identity automating the certification process. Most of our customers were using manual methods for user access certification. With Omada Identity, you can automate almost all of it, which means that certification now becomes on demand. You don't have to wait for two or three months to execute a certification timeframe. Instead, you can do certifications as often as you want." | "Lifecycle management, governance and documentation." More IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence Pros » | "We’re very satisfied with technical support. Usually we get people with the right knowledge who understand the solution very well." "When doing a review you can either make manual or automatic fulfillment to immediately apply the manager's decision to the system, like removing or adding new permissions to the user account." |
Cons | ||
"The user interface should have a more flexible design, where you can change it to your requirement." "When the re-certification process is launched that makes Omada very slow. There are performance issues in the current version." "The Omada Identity SaaS version doesn't provide all the features Omada Identity on-premise provides." | "Self service center is not always easy to understand." More IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence Cons » | "The solution should provide more connectors in future releases. The solution also should offer more monitoring." "We need more connectors to cloud applications like AWS." |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity Management (IM) solutions are best for your needs. 456,966 professionals have used our research since 2012. | ||
Questions from the Community | ||
Top Answer: The most valuable aspect of the product is that it is Microsoft-based and it supports all Microsoft technology. Top Answer: Licenses are only for installations and support problems. They are definitely additional costs. Top Answer: In terms of improvement, there are not so many out of the box connectors available in the current version. So what they… more » | Ask a question Earn 20 points | Ask a question Earn 20 points |
Popular Comparisons | ||
 Compared 34% of the time.  Compared 24% of the time.  Compared 16% of the time.  Compared 7% of the time.  Compared 6% of the time. | Compared 53% of the time.  Compared 15% of the time.  Compared 13% of the time. Compared 7% of the time.  Compared 7% of the time. | Compared 81% of the time. Compared 19% of the time. |
Also Known As | ||
| Omada Identity Suite | IGI, IBM Security Identity Manager, ISIM | NetIQ Access Governance Suite, Novell Access Governance Suite |
Learn | ||
| Omada Video Not Available | IBM | Micro Focus |
Overview  | ||
Omada Identity delivers an end-to-end identity and access management solution with essential identity governance functionality for secure, compliant, and efficient administration of all users' access rights across on-premises or cloud-based systems. The solution provides configurable best practice processes that covers all identity and access related scenarios from providing an access risk overview, management of identities lifecycle, to automated enforcement of policies. | IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence (IGI) delivers a business-centric approach to Identity Management and Governance. It empowers business and IT to work together to meet regulatory compliance and security goals across enterprise applications and data. IGI covers enterprise user lifecycle management, access risk assessment and mitigation, certification, password management as well as powerful analytics and reporting to enable business to make the right decisions on enterprise access. | NetIQ Identity Governance is a solution that helps any organization run effective access certification campaigns and implement identity governance controls to meet compliance mandates while proactively mitigating risk. Built to get organizations up and running in hours vs the weeks or months of traditional legacy vendors, NetIQ Identity Governance replaces errorprone, time consuming manual methods that can expose your organization to compliance violations and risk from excessive access. |
Offer | ||
Learn more about Omada Identity | Learn more about IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence | Learn more about NetIQ Identity Governance |
Sample Customers | ||
| Bayer, ECCO Shoes, Vattenfall, NuStar Energy, Unicredit, Schiphol Group | E.ON Global Commodities | Western & Southern Financial Group |
Top Industries | ||
Computer Software Company36% Comms Service Provider17% Financial Services Firm8% Government4% | Computer Software Company33% Comms Service Provider16% Financial Services Firm13% Energy/Utilities Company10% | No Data Available |
Find out what your peers are saying about One Identity, SailPoint, Microsoft and others in Identity Management (IM). Updated: January 2021.
456,966 professionals have used our research since 2012.
IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence is ranked 14th in Identity Management (IM) with 1 review while NetIQ Identity Governance is ranked 11th in Identity Management (IM) with 2 reviews. IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence is rated 7.0, while NetIQ Identity Governance is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence writes "Clear evaluation and life cycle management; service center could be more user friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetIQ Identity Governance writes "Access Review and Risk Evaluation features help keep us Audit-Ready". IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, OpenIAM Identity Governance, CyberArk PAS, Saviynt and Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), whereas NetIQ Identity Governance is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ and One Identity Manager.
See our list of best Identity Management (IM) vendors.
We monitor all Identity Management (IM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.