Compare Informatica PowerExchange vs. WhereScape RED

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica PowerExchange vs. WhereScape RED and other solutions. Updated: July 2021.
521,637 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The data transformation is the solution's most valuable feature.""The most valuable feature is connectivity to data sources.""Overall, it's a good tool. It's currently number one on the market. It pretty much has all the necessary capabilities to pull the incremental data from the source system, technically speaking.""The transformation work called for Informatica PowerExchange. It was easy to work with this and very stable.""Mainstream integration and real-time integration are the best features.""The user interface and user experience are perfectly all right.""Provides a significant amount of control over the landscape and overall implementation.""This product is easy to install and it can be done in a few hours."

More Informatica PowerExchange Pros »

"I found the initial setup very easy.""I like the data vault implementations.""The most valuable feature is the metadata generated code.""WhereScape is really helpful in terms of architecture data. Everything is one of automation. Two people can do thousands of tables in one day or two. It saves a lot of time."

More WhereScape RED Pros »

Cons
"The solution needs better integration with other tools.""Technical support can be improved with respect to delays in ticket response time.""The one place where it could be improved is definitely pricing. That's a very big problem. It depends product to product, but pricing is an issue.""Integration with the largest number of databases and other systems would be important.""Real-time has not been enhanced that much over the past few years. There has not been as many features added like they did before.""Informatica is very expensive in all aspects, so the pricing is something that could be improved.""Should diversify more, maybe with a reporting and visualization utility,""I would like to have easier integration with cloud platforms."

More Informatica PowerExchange Cons »

"The solution can be a little more user-friendly on enterprise-level where people use it.""Customization could be better.""Project-based searching of data objects in the data warehouse browser needs to be improved.""Technical support isn't the best."

More WhereScape RED Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"Our company purchased a corporate unlimited license."

More WhereScape RED Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration Tools solutions are best for your needs.
521,637 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: I like the data vault implementations.
Top Answer: Customization could be better. When you need to modify or write some custom code, it can get a little messy. Performance can also be better. It would be nice to have synchronicity when integrating… more »
Top Answer: I used WhereScape RED to do a proof of concept and understand how it worked.
Ranking
14th
Views
4,624
Comparisons
3,900
Reviews
8
Average Words per Review
411
Rating
8.1
21st
Views
9,992
Comparisons
4,470
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
429
Rating
7.7
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
PowerExchange, Connectors
Learn More
WhereScape
Video Not Available
Overview

Informatica PowerExchange Connectors provides high performance, out-of-the-box connectivity without having to develop custom data access programs.

WhereScape is data warehouse software that automates the Data Warehouse lifecycle. From implementation to maintenance, WhereScape will ensure your data warehouse projects are completed up to 5x faster than manual coding.

Offer
Learn more about Informatica PowerExchange
Learn more about WhereScape RED
Sample Customers
ACH Food, BNSF Railway Company, Illinois State University
British American Tobacco, Cornell University, Allianz Benelux, Finnair, Solarwinds and many more.
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider12%
Financial Services Firm11%
Insurance Company10%
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company25%
University25%
Manufacturing Company17%
Non Profit8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider13%
Insurance Company9%
Financial Services Firm6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business25%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise63%
REVIEWERS
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise58%
Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica PowerExchange vs. WhereScape RED and other solutions. Updated: July 2021.
521,637 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Informatica PowerExchange is ranked 14th in Data Integration Tools with 8 reviews while WhereScape RED is ranked 21st in Data Integration Tools with 4 reviews. Informatica PowerExchange is rated 8.2, while WhereScape RED is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Informatica PowerExchange writes "Offers data in real-time using CDC concepts but it should be more flexible ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WhereScape RED writes "Quick to set up, flexible, and stable". Informatica PowerExchange is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, Oracle GoldenGate, SSIS, Qlik Replicate and SAP Process Orchestration, whereas WhereScape RED is most compared with SSIS, Informatica PowerCenter, Azure Data Factory, Talend Open Studio and Matillion ETL. See our Informatica PowerExchange vs. WhereScape RED report.

See our list of best Data Integration Tools vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.