Infraon Desk vs JIRA Service Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
EverestIMS Logo
167 views|72 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Atlassian Logo
7,537 views|5,299 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Infraon Desk and JIRA Service Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Help Desk Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Infraon Desk vs. JIRA Service Management Report (Updated: May 2024).
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Infraon Desk is very flexible in nature and can be customized for my needs. The fact that I can customize it the way I want is the best part of the tool for me.""There are a few dashboards and they are helpful because, in our organization, we have different groups of people who need different kinds of dashboards... as head of network operations, I need a top-level view. I want to see how many calls are open and how many calls are pending, on average, and some trend analysis. Whereas a manager in my team might like to see slightly more detail."

More Infraon Desk Pros →

"We have an Agile environment and using Jira makes it easy to adhere to Agile best practices.""The most valuable features of JIRA Service Management are the service level agreement or management, and the ticketing system. Additionally, there are frequent updates that provide improvements.""With Jira Service Desk, the simplicity of setting up a quick form and getting the service desk running quickly is very helpful.""I like the history, the dimensioning, and how I can configure a space based on my preferences or the project circumstances.""It is much more controlled and allows for different kinds of customization that we can plan and implement based on the project requirements.""The simplicity is good for our clients. The price is good.""It scales well.""Some of the most valuable features are simplicity, ease of configuration, and ease of customization."

More JIRA Service Management Pros →

Cons
"Better connectivity and integration with more collaborative platforms would be helpful.""The reporting is okay, but it doesn't give you reports that make you say "wow," like you might see from a tool like MRTG or PRTG whose reports give you a good feeling. The detailing is not there in the Infraon Desk reports and there are no graphical elements in them. The reporting is slightly weak and needs to be improved."

More Infraon Desk Cons →

"We have a lot of add-ons, however, instead of the add-ons, for example, cloning could be better.""Integration possibilities with other products that are not Atlassian would be helpful. Support should also provide separate installation guides for each product even though they are easy to install.""We have tried exporting some of the test cases into Jira from Excel. The interface for that isn't very user-friendly.""I would like to see the user interface changed, it is not very user-friendly, and it transitions workflows.""The initial setup is very complex.""As a consultant, I have used the support. Some of the support I have received has been good and other times it could improve.""The deployment can be a bit complex, especially for those who are not technical.""From the customer side, it's not friendly used compared to other competitors, like ServiceNow or BMC. It's also not fully ITSM management if you compare it with ServiceNow or BMC. They have a full model of ITSM. In BMC they have TrueSight, they have Discovery, which helps IT to discover IT equipment with a serial number, with the specs, capacity of the server."

More JIRA Service Management Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing model is very competitive."
  • "The price of this solution is reasonable and it was well within my budget."
  • More Infraon Desk Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Costs are about $50 per user per year. JIRA is sold in user tiers of 25, 50, 100, 250, 500, 2000, 10,000, and unlimited users. It is bad when you have 51 users then the price is based on that 100 user tier. Users at 100 will be the most cost effective."
  • "JIRA Service Desk has different pricing as it is based on agents. On average, the price is about $300 per agent."
  • "Do not forget to calculate add-on costs. These cost a percentage of the JIRA purchasing costs and are based on the number of JIRA users."
  • "Buying a software solution is only a half part of the solution (or even less). You need to optimize usage of the software by hiring professionals who will help you to make the most of the software, especially in the beginning."
  • "I would suggest to always buy licenses through an Atlassian partner, so you can also rely on their expertise."
  • "But about the plugins, I found one plug-in — its name is Actionable Metric I think — and it is $3000. That is very expensive for users in Iran."
  • "Actually in Iran we don't have copyright or intellectual property, so we can use JIRA for free."
  • "It's not really expensive, especially when you compare to ServiceNow or other solutions, and it's not expensive to maintain."
  • More JIRA Service Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Help Desk Software solutions are best for your needs.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:JIRA Service Management is a very user-friendly solution.
    Top Answer:It is one of the premium products on the market, but it is very costly, especially in the Indian market. Smaller organizations cannot afford it. We pay monthly licensing costs. We only have to pay for… more »
    Ranking
    39th
    out of 59 in Help Desk Software
    Views
    167
    Comparisons
    72
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    2nd
    out of 59 in Help Desk Software
    Views
    7,537
    Comparisons
    5,299
    Reviews
    33
    Average Words per Review
    557
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Everest Service Manager
    JIRA Service Desk
    Learn More
    Overview

    With its light-weight codes, Infraon DESK can not only integrate with any existing tools in your datacenter, but also act as an Umbrella Manager for managing all your supporting IT tools on a single unified dashboard.

    JIRA Service Management is Atlassian’s IT service management (ITSM) solution. It unlocks all teams at high velocity by:

    1. Accelerating the flow of work between IT teams, development teams, and business teams

    2. Empowering teams to deliver their service more quickly

    3. Bringing visibility to their work

    Built on JIRA, JIRA Service Management enables best practices across request, incident, problem, change, knowledge, asset, and configuration management so that teams can streamline collaboration between themselves. More than 30,000 customers of all sizes rely on JIRA Service Management to deliver service.

    JIRA Service Management Features

    JIRA Service Management has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

    • Request management: Allows businesses to manage work across teams with one platform so employees and customers get the help they need quickly.
    • Problem management: To minimize the impact of incidents, this feature groups incidents, fast-tracks root cause analysis, and records workarounds.
    • Change management: IT teams are empowered by richer contextual information around changes from software development tools. This helps them minimize risk and make better decisions.
    • Asset management: Manage inventory efficiently, track lifecycles and ownership, and reduce costs.
    • Configuration management: Attain visibility into the infrastructure that supports critical services and applications. Understand service dependencies to minimize risk.
    • Incident management: The solution brings development and IT teams together to rapidly respond to, resolve, and learn from incidents.
    • Knowledge management: While fostering team collaboration, the solution enables self-service, deflection of more requests, and management of knowledge articles.

    JIRA Service Management Benefits

    There are many benefits to implementing JIRA Service Management. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

    • The solution empowers all teams across IT, development, and business with intuitive, flexible workflows.
    • Work is made visible through the open and collaborative JIRA platform.
    • Connect IT and development on a single platform to accelerate workflow.
    • Gain significant ROI with competitive pricing on useful features.
    • Benefit from faster time to value by implementing a full ITSM solution in just a few months.
    • Lower total cost of ownership without expensive ongoing maintenance and upgrades.
    • Enjoy a broad ecosystem of more than 4,000 best-in-class apps and integrations.

    Reviews from Real Users

    JIRA Service Management stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Some of these include its stability, its easy customization, and its seamless integration with other solutions. PeerSpot users take note of the advantages of these features in their reviews:

    Abhishek S., a Program Lead at PureSoftware, writes of the solution, “You can scale the solution whether it is deployed to the cloud or the data center. While we might have up to 5,200 people using the solution, we do not require that many licenses, as only those dealing with the tickets are required to be licensed.”

    Andrew B., a Technical Engineer at a consultancy firm, notes, “One of the valuable features is that an automatic response or action can be taken on tickets. We can have certain responses for tickets that contain keywords or are logged and tagged with certain labels.”

    Sample Customers
    Airtel, BSNL, Cloudnine, D-Vois, Geojit, Indian telco
    mgm technology partners, Telestream, Build.com, Zend Technologies, OfficeDrop, PGS Software, American Diabetes Association, NEPTUNE Canada
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company35%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    Retailer9%
    Transportation Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Government7%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise28%
    Large Enterprise35%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise59%
    Buyer's Guide
    Infraon Desk vs. JIRA Service Management
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Infraon Desk vs. JIRA Service Management and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Infraon Desk is ranked 39th in Help Desk Software while JIRA Service Management is ranked 2nd in Help Desk Software with 73 reviews. Infraon Desk is rated 7.6, while JIRA Service Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Infraon Desk writes "Helps us monitor customer ticket SLAs and enables us to understand why SLAs are missed and to improve our processes as a result". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JIRA Service Management writes "Customizable, stable, and integrates well". Infraon Desk is most compared with , whereas JIRA Service Management is most compared with ServiceNow, ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus, Freshdesk, BMC Helix ITSM and PagerDuty Operations Cloud. See our Infraon Desk vs. JIRA Service Management report.

    See our list of best Help Desk Software vendors and best IT Service Management (ITSM) vendors.

    We monitor all Help Desk Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.