Compare Keysight Oscilloscopes vs. Teledyne LeCroy Oscilloscopes

Keysight Oscilloscopes is ranked 1st in Oscilloscopes with 23 reviews while Teledyne LeCroy Oscilloscopes is ranked 5th in Oscilloscopes with 5 reviews. Keysight Oscilloscopes is rated 8.4, while Teledyne LeCroy Oscilloscopes is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Keysight Oscilloscopes writes "Enables our high-speed compliance measurements for USB and display port HDMI, but GUI needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Teledyne LeCroy Oscilloscopes writes "We heavily use it to validate the design assumption". Keysight Oscilloscopes is most compared with Tektronix Oscilloscopes, Teledyne LeCroy Oscilloscopes and National Instruments (NI) Oscilloscopes, whereas Teledyne LeCroy Oscilloscopes is most compared with Keysight Oscilloscopes, Tektronix Oscilloscopes and Rohde & Schwarz Oscilloscopes. See our Keysight Oscilloscopes vs. Teledyne LeCroy Oscilloscopes report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Keysight Oscilloscopes vs. Teledyne LeCroy Oscilloscopes and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
371,917 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
Because they're such a big industry standard name, their products are standardized across many customers, which is why people own these products.The customer support is very good. If you need an application to do any measurement, you can easily get a hold of people to help you with it. This is a whole ecosystem.The user interface is simple and straightforward, so I can easily measure frequency, time, and other complex measurements.It has the highest bandwidth and resolution on the market.The technical support is good, and it has very strong customer support. They sent an engineer to us who gave us some training and tutorials.The Keysight Ecal feature has made it very easy for me to do calibrations.The product's functionality makes things easier for my partner, who is doing the PCIe design. He is able measure the product's usage and bit error rate.Before silicon came back, our customers' performance was affected. Using these tools, we are able to deliver performance to our customers.

Read more »

Checking how many errors were on the channel by using the protocol analyzer has helped me to improve my design on PCIe PETracers.We are able to capture the transient domain accurately. There are some technical features where you can do FFT.It has a nice high-resolution screen. It is easy to set up the scope triggers, has a lot of scope trigger options for capturing waveforms, and seamlessly goes into the spectrum analysis mode.The most valuable feature is the embedded protocol analysis.We heavily use it to validate the design assumption. In many cases, it was able to point out things that were not available to us in simulation.

Read more »

Cons
There is a learning curve depends on the client that I am working with. E.g., if I'm working with a client, and they have a test and measurement equipment company, when I go to another company, the new company may not be using the same model.The user interface has a load of features that come with it, which is why it is an eight out of ten.The technical support is okay, but sometimes they are on a different page than us. If it is something wrong with the scope, they are okay. However, if something technical goes wrong, like the calibration, it is hard to get the information that we need because it is hard to share everything and explain all the measurements in real-time.We are using this product to support connected devices for IoT development, but we need more automation.I would like them to build in more high-speed functions, such as FEC or PCIe, built into the array. PERT to be built-in for more specific product call. These would make our lives much easier.If the simulation runs for a long time, it will suddenly crash. If they can debug that, the product would be better.Their GUI is not the best. They need to improve on that. I think their software team needs to put in a little bit more work on how they are presenting the application on the scope.I would also like to see a more detailed change-notice from version to version, what changed. If they had a more detailed description of what is changing and the reason for it, rather than just releasing, that would be good for us so we know whether or not to upgrade.

Read more »

I would like more technical details on what each packet represents and more information on the flow.Since we do a lot of post processing when we download our waveforms to our computers, we need more post processing capabilities.They could always work on the software stability of the products, particularly now that everything has switched over to a Windows-based interface. It creates a lot of crashes and bugs, which typically is a problem among all instruments.The interconnect methods to the device are a little limited right now. I'd like to see other ways of being able to connect to the device.I would like them to be current with the latest standards. So, as soon as a new standard comes in, ensure that it gets rolled into the existing software.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The pricing is very expensive.The price is affordable for us, but for smaller companies, probably not.Our solution is upgradable. However, upgrading depends on how much money the company is willing to spend, because each upgrade will take a million dollars.The pricing is very expensive, but with leading technology, nothing is cheap.The pricing is always high.They're not cheap.Pricing always is very expensive. There's no free lunch.Pricing can be improved a bit. They try to make the pricing competitive but I think there are times that the competitors have good pricing.

Read more »

The bandwidth is pretty expensive on these instruments, so we typically use it all.They're fairly competitive for pricing across the industry.I would like them to include a lot of the add-on options as part of the package. Typically, we start in at a price, and by the time we add up all the options that we need which are available, we are at double or triple the original price.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Oscilloscopes solutions are best for your needs.
371,917 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
1st
out of 10 in Oscilloscopes
Views
1,061
Comparisons
507
Reviews
23
Average Words per Review
523
Avg. Rating
8.3
5th
out of 10 in Oscilloscopes
Views
389
Comparisons
182
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
408
Avg. Rating
8.0
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
InfiniiVision Series, Infiniium SeriesWaveSurfer Series, HDO Series
Learn
Keysight Technologies
Teledyne LeCroy
Overview

More engineers are switching to Keysight oscilloscopes because they help you:

  • Get your products to market faster with award-winning oscilloscopes that offer the fastest update rates, the deepest memory, the industry‚Äôs only capacitive touch screen, and the most oscilloscope software options.
  • Produce the highest-performing products with measurements you can trust thanks to oscilloscopes with industry-leading signal integrity and the largest selection of oscilloscope probes.
  • Achieve the lowest cost of ownership with multiple instruments in one mainframe and easy upgrades.
  • Get a compact instrument with zero compromise in functionality with the Keysight Streamline Series USB oscilloscopes.

Teledyne LeCroy's oscilloscopes offer a powerful combination of large and informative displays combined with advanced waveshape analysis capabilities - typically tailored to enhance the productivity of engineers in specific applications areas such as serial data test, disk drive test and automotive bus analysis.

Offer
Learn more about Keysight Oscilloscopes
Learn more about Teledyne LeCroy Oscilloscopes
Sample Customers
Nokia Bell Labs
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Keysight Oscilloscopes vs. Teledyne LeCroy Oscilloscopes and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
371,917 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Oscilloscopes reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email