Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Keysight Oscilloscopes vs. National Instruments (NI) Oscilloscopes and other solutions. Updated: May 2019.
340,467 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Because they're such a big industry standard name, their products are standardized across many customers, which is why people own these products.
The customer support is very good. If you need an application to do any measurement, you can easily get a hold of people to help you with it. This is a whole ecosystem.
The user interface is simple and straightforward, so I can easily measure frequency, time, and other complex measurements.
It has the highest bandwidth and resolution on the market.
The technical support is good, and it has very strong customer support. They sent an engineer to us who gave us some training and tutorials.
The Keysight Ecal feature has made it very easy for me to do calibrations.
The product's functionality makes things easier for my partner, who is doing the PCIe design. He is able measure the product's usage and bit error rate.
Before silicon came back, our customers' performance was affected. Using these tools, we are able to deliver performance to our customers.
The learning curve was really fast, which was also the reason for saving a lot on the budget.
The user interface is absolutely great. It creates an easy working environment because it has well-integrated hardware and software. So, it is easy to use.
It makes programming simpler.
The user interface is very good. Their boards are reliable. We buy boards from them, they are reliable, and we don't have problems with them.
Because their view is a graphical user interface (GUI), it's very easy to program the tool.
I can automate a lot of testing very quickly. With just a push of a button, I can test hundreds of different scenarios without having to do all that manual testing myself.
It saves me a lot of time. You can click a button and walk away, basically doing a week's worth of work in 20 minutes, it's a pretty good time saver.
It took us less than a week to get integrated into the solution, which is very fast.
There is a learning curve depends on the client that I am working with. E.g., if I'm working with a client, and they have a test and measurement equipment company, when I go to another company, the new company may not be using the same model.
The user interface has a load of features that come with it, which is why it is an eight out of ten.
The technical support is okay, but sometimes they are on a different page than us. If it is something wrong with the scope, they are okay. However, if something technical goes wrong, like the calibration, it is hard to get the information that we need because it is hard to share everything and explain all the measurements in real-time.
We are using this product to support connected devices for IoT development, but we need more automation.
I would like them to build in more high-speed functions, such as FEC or PCIe, built into the array. PERT to be built-in for more specific product call. These would make our lives much easier.
If the simulation runs for a long time, it will suddenly crash. If they can debug that, the product would be better.
Their GUI is not the best. They need to improve on that. I think their software team needs to put in a little bit more work on how they are presenting the application on the scope.
I would also like to see a more detailed change-notice from version to version, what changed. If they had a more detailed description of what is changing and the reason for it, rather than just releasing, that would be good for us so we know whether or not to upgrade.
I would like to have more RF. They're going that way, but still there is some work that they have to do.
The software has room for improvement.
I would like more speed and a reduction in size.
There is a learning curve. It takes one to two months to get acclimated to the tool.
It took a good year until I felt proficient using the product, as It is a complex program. Their newest version has a less steep learning curve, but back closer to 15 years ago, it was a lot less user-friendly.
National Instruments needs to be focusing on its 5G RF applications. They are aware of this, and that's where most of their R&D is going.
I would like to see more of a tasking user base and documentation inside the instrument itself, rather than having to go online for it.
I would like to see them increase the productivity and auxiliary functions.
Pricing and Cost Advice
The pricing is very expensive.
The price is affordable for us, but for smaller companies, probably not.
Our solution is upgradable. However, upgrading depends on how much money the company is willing to spend, because each upgrade will take a million dollars.
The pricing is very expensive, but with leading technology, nothing is cheap.
The pricing is always high.
They're not cheap.
Pricing always is very expensive. There's no free lunch.
Pricing can be improved a bit. They try to make the pricing competitive but I think there are times that the competitors have good pricing.
I have saved almost 50 percent of my total budget for a project by using their products.
They have an initial investment cost, which is quite high. But, along the way, there is so much behind it that the product is really invaluable.
It's a bit expensive. However, you get the entire package, not just the box. It's a box which supports older releases.
The cost of the equipment has room for improvement. The pricing could improve.
I would like more competitive pricing.
It's reasonably priced for what we spend our money on in the lab. It's one of the lower-end purchases.
These products are a very low-cost, effective alternative to traditional Big Iron ATE hardware.
The price is a little steep. A lot of people, like our customers, use a different machine because of the price. The price has to come down a bit so we can do other tests without paying the equipment's high costs.
out of 10 in Oscilloscopes
Average Words per Review
out of 10 in Oscilloscopes
Average Words per Review
Compared 41% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 100% of the time.
Also Known As
|InfiniiVision Series, Infiniium Series||NI Oscilloscopes|
|Keysight Technologies||National Instruments|
More engineers are switching to Keysight oscilloscopes because they help you:
Turning powerful possibilities into real solutions with our open, software-defined platform for automated test and automated measurement systems.
Learn more about Keysight Oscilloscopes
Learn more about National Instruments (NI) Oscilloscopes
|Nokia Bell Labs|
Information Not Available