We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure App Service and Temenos Quantum based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Mobile Development Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure App Service is autoscaling and resource grouping. Additionally, the integration works well, it is easy to do."
"Enroll in some kind of formal training, not from Microsoft, but from a partner, and keep up with the change because the Azure platform changes a lot."
"The technical support from Microsoft Azure App Service is good."
"This solution is easy to deploy."
"The Logic Apps and Azure functions are very robust."
"The feature I find most valuable is the 'Diagnose and Solve problem' function. This not only allows us to fix a problem, but also to generate analytics on why the issue occurred."
"The user interface and the ability to quickly develop are the two main advantages of Microsoft Azure App Service. You can develop anything without having any coding experience and it is not complex and the components are easily customizable."
"One valuable feature of Azure App Service for us is its integration with Azure DevOps, which we heavily rely on in our development process."
"The initial setup of Temenos Quantum was easy."
"We can use a single channel to create an interface for iOS, Android, and other channels."
"The most valuable feature is usability. You can develop components inside it and reuse them in different parts of your application, wherever needed. You can replicate them. There's also a Quantum Fabric on the back end, which provides a middle layer between your database and the third-party systems you need to integrate. It also provides the integration to handle all sorts of exceptions and timeouts on the Fabric. This makes it easy to troubleshoot errors coming from third-party APIs."
"Its greatest advantage lies in its exceptional security and robustness."
"The most valuable features of Temenos Quantum are user-friendliness and customizability."
"The best feature is the Kony Studio, which is the product that is used to develop interfaces."
"It is a single platform that can cater to mobile and web development requirements, making it convenient for businesses looking to transition into the digital space."
"Comparing other solutions with Temenos Quantum, the later is less mature and presents several issues. Implementing Temenos Quantum has been challenging, resembling a nightmare compared to the smoother experience with the other."
"The outbound connectivity is not great."
"If you're on the cloud, you just get a web interface without much detail for additional configuration or the authority to configure the root or system-level configuration."
"Lacking somewhat in template data flows."
"The pricing is average. It could be lower."
"The solution is quite expensive. If you need more features, you need to pay for them."
"The cost management of this solution could be better. We only receive estimations."
"I would like to see faster adoption and templates that we can use."
"I am new to the intervention and I find it difficult to find my way around the user interface. I have my own learning tool. However, it could be simpler for new users."
"There is definitely room for improvement, especially in the areas of AI, AR, and DR for mobile and web applications"
"Using the API manager can be complicated when you're dealing with multiple teams, projects, and APIs. Quantum doesn't have user-based access, so I can't restrict parts of the project to specific users."
"We would like to have widgets for graphs and analytics, as well as the integration of machine learning."
"They need to improve their tech support's abilities. They do have a good tech support, but it still requires improvement."
"Temenos Quantum needs to improve its usability. It lacks information on the network. We have to contact the support when we are stuck with something."
"The UI lacks flexibility, especially regarding customizations. There are numerous issues at the fabric end, and working with the visualizer is extremely challenging. Basic development tasks require a high-end machine, and even clicking on an icon initiates a thirty-second processing time. The challenges mainly revolve around fabric and content."
"The technology of the solution needs an update. It is deficient in terms of connectivity."
"It would be highly beneficial if future iterations of Temenos could incorporate support for QR-based payment methods, as it would enhance the platform's capabilities and align it more closely with modern payment trends"
Microsoft Azure App Service is ranked 5th in Mobile Development Platforms with 38 reviews while Temenos Quantum is ranked 9th in Mobile Development Platforms with 15 reviews. Microsoft Azure App Service is rated 8.4, while Temenos Quantum is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure App Service writes "A solution with great server management and helps improve performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Temenos Quantum writes "Though a secure tool for building applications, there is a need to improve its stability". Microsoft Azure App Service is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Oracle Application Express (APEX), ServiceNow, Pega BPM and Xamarin Platform, whereas Temenos Quantum is most compared with OutSystems, ServiceNow and Mendix. See our Microsoft Azure App Service vs. Temenos Quantum report.
See our list of best Mobile Development Platforms vendors and best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Mobile Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
