• Home
  • Laserfiche Rio vs. SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management

Laserfiche Rio vs SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Laserfiche Rio and SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Content Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Christian Begaux
A powerful solution that offers BPM and automation to assist with our digital transformation
This is a very complete and powerful solution. No code: We can address all of the features and functionalities with computer-minded people without... Read more →
Ankit Mehta
A stable tool with good integration capabilities
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"This is a very complete and powerful solution."

More Laserfiche Rio Pros →

"The integration capabilities of the product are pretty good."

More SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management Pros →

Cons
"We would like to see more features for RPA and AI."

More Laserfiche Rio Cons →

"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."

More SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "I rate the product price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

    • More SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management?
    Top Answer:The integration capabilities of the product are pretty good.
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Extended Ente...
    Top Answer:The prices can vary depending on the customer, region, and domain. I rate the product price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price.
    What needs improvement with SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management?
    Top Answer:The product's user interface is an area of concern where improvements are required. The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required. The tool could be made a bit more… more »
    Ranking
    23rd
    out of 46 in Enterprise Content Management
    Views
    300
    Comparisons
    177
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    14th
    out of 46 in Enterprise Content Management
    Views
    325
    Comparisons
    283
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    725
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management by OpenText, SAP Extended ECM
    Learn More
    Laserfiche
    SAP
    Overview
    Powerful Document Management Software and Agile Enterprise Content Management Solutions

    A digital core built on the SAP HANA business data platform and integrated applications for content management comprise the next-generation business model to complete your digital transformation and help you manage unstructured content as part of the business transactions more effectively while facilitating collaboration and storing content to avoid redundancies, minimize information growth, and support regulatory compliance. The SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management application by OpenText helps you engage customers with a 360-degree view of their profile and optimize procurement processes, employee productivity, process efficiency, and equipment ROI.

    Sample Customers
    D.L. Evans, College of the Desert, Community Action, Tompkins County, Hanson McClain, Olmsted County, Old Line Bank, Steinhafels, CIRCOR Pibiviesse
    Metropolitan Utilities District, MAN Diesel & Turbo
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization36%
    Government15%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise45%
    Large Enterprise36%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Enterprise Content Management
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Laserfiche Rio is ranked 23rd in Enterprise Content Management while SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management is ranked 14th in Enterprise Content Management with 1 review. Laserfiche Rio is rated 10.0, while SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Laserfiche Rio writes "A powerful solution that offers BPM and automation to assist with our digital transformation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management writes "A stable tool with good integration capabilities". Laserfiche Rio is most compared with SharePoint, DocuWare and OpenText eDOCS, whereas SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management is most compared with Adobe Experience Manager and IBM ECM.

    See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

    We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.