MATS vs ProcessMaker comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
MatsSoft Logo
71 views|58 comparisons
ProcessMaker Logo
767 views|495 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between MATS and ProcessMaker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM).
To learn more, read our detailed Business Process Management (BPM) Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Ranking
Views
71
Comparisons
58
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
767
Comparisons
495
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Business Process Management (BPM)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: March 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
ProcessMaker Workflow Management & BPM, ProcessMaker BPM
Learn More
MatsSoft
Video Not Available
Overview

MATS is a new breed of "Low-code" BPM software that's quick to learn, easy to use and requires less IT. By using its drag-and-drop interface to configure, rather than code, you can build a new app faster than you can brief IT to do it for you.

ProcessMaker is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina. The company specializes primarily in developing and marketing enterprise business process management (BPM) software. The company also provides customer support, training, and professional services to larger enterprise customers that require highly customized solutions. The company’s flagship Low-Code BPM product is known for its ease of use and ability for deep customization.

Sample Customers
ITV, Thomas Cook, Mott MacDonald, Accord Mortgages, Nationwide, Roll Back Malaria, Coca Cola, FedEx, Intel, RBS, Vodafone, Barclaycard
Tulsa Community College, Sirius College, Mcredit Vietnam, Oregon City Schools, Lakozy Toyota, HyperCube
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company17%
Financial Services Firm17%
Government10%
Comms Service Provider9%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business26%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise61%
Buyer's Guide
Business Process Management (BPM)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: March 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

MATS is ranked 70th in Business Process Management (BPM) while ProcessMaker is ranked 37th in Business Process Management (BPM). MATS is rated 0.0, while ProcessMaker is rated 7.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of ProcessMaker writes "Easy to learn, automates our manual processes to make things easier, and saves us time and money". MATS is most compared with , whereas ProcessMaker is most compared with Camunda, Apache Airflow, Bonita, Appian and Nintex Process Platform.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.