Compare Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise vs. Tricentis Flood

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise vs. Tricentis Flood and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
501,818 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"This product is better oriented to large, enterprise-oriented organizations.""The solution is a very user-friendly tool, especially when you compare it to a competitor like BlazeMeter.""This is a product that has a lot of capabilities and is the most mature tool of its kind in the market.""The most valuable part of the product is the way you can scale the basic testing easily.""Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise Is very user-friendly.""I think the number one feature everybody likes is the capability to easily generate virtual users as well as the reporting."

More Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise Pros »

"The most valuable feature is the support for Java, where we can quickly code what we need.""Their technical support is awesome.""You can utilize this tool on the cloud, and also access application on-premises. That is a very good part of the solution."

More Tricentis Flood Pros »

Cons
"While the stability is generally good, there are a few strange issues that crop up unexpectedly which affect consistent use of the product.""The solution is a very expensive tool when compared with other tools.""The TruClient protocol works well but it takes a lot of memory to run those tests, which is something that can be improved.""Third-party product integrations could be a little more slickly handled.""The reporting has room for improvement.""It's not that popular on the cloud."

More Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise Cons »

"The performance of the tool needs to improve.""We used an implementation strategy to deploy the solution, not because of the tools, but mainly because of the scripting part of the tool.""The solution is quite immature, it is not in an optimal state."

More Tricentis Flood Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"It is a bit expensive, especially for smaller organizations, but over-all it can save you money.""The price is okay. You're able to buy it, as opposed to paying for a full year.""They have a much more practical pricing model now."

More Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise Pricing and Cost Advice »

"This solution is in the average price range compared to other testing tools.""The only positive point is it came free with my test automation tool."

More Tricentis Flood Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
501,818 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: I think the number one feature everybody likes is the capability to easily generate virtual users as well as the reporting.
Top Answer: The price is okay. You're able to buy it, as opposed to paying for a full year. You can just on-demand purchase it for your users for a day or two, which is nice in an MSP business like mine. If I… more »
Top Answer: I think LoadRunner is still getting into grips with me — maybe, I've not used it that much. It's not that popular on the cloud. Also, we have not tried this on mobile platforms with mobile virtual… more »
Top Answer: You can utilize this tool on the cloud, and also access application on-premises. That is a very good part of the solution.
Top Answer: The positive point we were able to achieve the objective as per plan.
Top Answer: The solution is not in an optimal state. During POC, we analyzed tool is kept on upgrading. The patch deployment is happening in parallel, things that are working today are not working tomorrow. We… more »
Ranking
4th
out of 23 in Load Testing Tools
Views
5,096
Comparisons
3,771
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
793
Rating
7.5
12th
out of 23 in Load Testing Tools
Views
981
Comparisons
691
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
552
Rating
7.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Performance Center, Micro Focus Performance Center, HPE Performance Center
Flood IO
Learn More
Overview

Micro Focus Performance Center is a global cross-enterprise performance testing tool which enables you to manage multiple, concurrent performance testing projects across different geographic locations without any need to travel between the locations. Performance Center administers all your internal performance testing needs. With Performance Center, you manage all aspects of large-scale performance testing projects, including resource allocation and scheduling, from a centralized location accessible through the Web. Performance Center helps streamline the testing process, reduce resource costs, and increase operating efficiency.

Tricentis Flood is a cloud-based, distributed load testing platform that helps teams test, analyze and improve the way their applications scale - with seamless integration across the DevOps pipeline. With Tricentis Flood, you can achieve a continuous view of application performance and go live with confidence.

Offer
Learn more about Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise
Learn more about Tricentis Flood
Sample Customers
Hexaware, British Sky Broadcasting, JetBlue
Nike, heroku, Soulcycle, NEC, boston.com, Typeform, Xero, Telus
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm24%
Computer Software Company18%
Insurance Company15%
Retailer15%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company38%
Comms Service Provider13%
Financial Services Firm11%
Insurance Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company35%
Comms Service Provider12%
Energy/Utilities Company9%
Government8%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business12%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise78%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise vs. Tricentis Flood and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
501,818 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is ranked 4th in Load Testing Tools with 6 reviews while Tricentis Flood is ranked 12th in Load Testing Tools with 3 reviews. Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is rated 7.6, while Tricentis Flood is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise writes "Tests the performance of our applications and has the ability to share the screen while you are running a test". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis Flood writes "Awesome technical support, integrates well, and installation is easy". Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, Apache JMeter, Micro Focus ALM Quality Center and Neotys NeoLoad, whereas Tricentis Flood is most compared with BlazeMeter, Neotys NeoLoad, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud and Apache JMeter. See our Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise vs. Tricentis Flood report.

See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.