We performed a comparison between OpenText Operations Bridge and vCenter Configuration Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, ServiceNow, Microsoft and others in Event Monitoring."The most valuable features of the solution are its grouping scripts and event focus."
"It allows us to build dashboards for individual parts of the business. Our team members appreciate that they can just get a view of their part of the world without having to worry about anyone else's."
"Purely, its flexibility is the most valuable aspect. It is hugely configurable."
"We haven't faced any stability issues. There hasn't been any crashes or glitches."
"I find the Micro Focus Operations Bridge dashboard valuable, including its instrument analysis and anomaly control features that help indicate root causes and problems with your infrastructure."
"The correlation feature is the most used feature. It allows you to correlate events from different sources and have more meaningful events."
"The most valuable feature is its ability to integrate with everything."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward. It's not complex at all."
"It is a very stable solution."
"vCenter alone is enough for me because vCenter is a cluster environment and cluster solution for virtualization environments."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"My primary use case is for migration"
"vCenter Configuration Manager is a stable solution that is very easy to manage and deploy."
"vCenter Configuration Manager is a very good product, it works well."
"The tool's scalability is good and easy, especially when compared to Microsoft Hyper-V."
"Configuration Manager simplifies management. Cloning via live migration is a useful feature."
"It is a very complicated product. It's difficult to manage. Nowadays, products are very easy to manage, deploy, and integrate, but Operations Bridge is very complicated to manage."
"The setup process can get a little bit complex."
"Remove the dependency of Java technology. This is a feature used for admin purposes to update the modeling."
"I'm not aware of areas that need improvement."
"The initial setup of this tool is complex for people who lack experience with it."
"The price is quite expensive, and because of this, we may try another solution."
"I know that in the next version, X1005, they're moving to more graphical overviews, which should help our senior managers."
"pology-based event correlation does not work well with NNM events."
"The reporting could be improved."
"Users need to pay a licensing fee for the solution, which could be cheaper."
"There isn't a clear document covering all the errors. It would be helpful if the company provided better documentation for solving issues."
"The Self Service Interface is not very good and it needs improvement."
"The cost of this solution should be improved."
"There is room for improvement in operating and managing cluster environments and maintenance. And hardware environment visibility."
"Error reporting should be more precise and descriptive, and there is no way to filter the logs. It would be helpful if its logs analysis can be more detailed, and the logs can be filtered."
"The product's price could be lesser."
More vCenter Configuration Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
OpenText Operations Bridge is ranked 8th in Event Monitoring with 44 reviews while vCenter Configuration Manager is ranked 10th in Configuration Management with 50 reviews. OpenText Operations Bridge is rated 7.8, while vCenter Configuration Manager is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of OpenText Operations Bridge writes "Good event correlation capabilities, promotes a self-service approach to monitoring". On the other hand, the top reviewer of vCenter Configuration Manager writes "A solution with a range of functionalities and several pricing plans that suit your needs". OpenText Operations Bridge is most compared with SCOM, OpsRamp, BMC Helix Monitor, Splunk Enterprise Security and IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus, whereas vCenter Configuration Manager is most compared with Microsoft Configuration Manager, Red Hat Satellite and BigFix.
We monitor all Event Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.