Compare Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs. Radware LinkProof

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is ranked 7th in Application Delivery Controllers with 3 reviews while Radware LinkProof is ranked 14th in Application Delivery Controllers with 1 review. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is rated 8.4, while Radware LinkProof is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway writes "Secures our internal applications and hides them from outside connections". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware LinkProof writes "Helps us with outbound traffic link load balancing and has good stability and performance". Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is most compared with F5 BIG-IP, AWS WAF, F5 Advanced WAF, HAProxy and Cloudflare, whereas Radware LinkProof is most compared with Radware Alteon, F5 BIG-IP, Fortinet FortiADC , Citrix ADC and A10 Networks Thunder ADC.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Radware LinkProof? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Citrix, A10 Networks and others in Application Delivery Controllers. Updated: June 2020.
425,660 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
This is a SaaS product, so it is always up to date.The simplicity of the solution and its ability to integrate easily with others are its most valuable aspects.We chose this solution in the first place because it has access to Layer 7. I can control the requests and the content, which I can access on my network if I want to even if it's forbidden access to other external resources. If I want to monitor, for example, traffic, and apply this rule on Layer 7, I can do so. This was our main goal when implementing this application. We wanted to take advantage of the Gateway capabilities.

More Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Pros »

The performance and stability are the most valuable features.

More Radware LinkProof Pros »

Cons
For the first-time user, it is difficult to understand so the user-interface needs to be improved.The pricing of the solution could be improved. Right now, it's a bit expensive.The pricing of the solution is a bit high. The solution should offer different pricing systems.

More Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Cons »

There are certain features I would like to see in the next release.

More Radware LinkProof Cons »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers solutions are best for your needs.
425,660 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
8,090
Comparisons
7,175
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
432
Avg. Rating
8.3
Views
708
Comparisons
600
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
206
Avg. Rating
9.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 40% of the time.
Compared 30% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Also Known As
Azure Application GatewayLinkProof
Learn
Microsoft
Radware
Overview

Azure Application Gateway is a web traffic load balancer that enables you to manage traffic to your web applications. Traditional load balancers operate at the transport layer (OSI layer 4 - TCP and UDP) and route traffic based on source IP address and port, to a destination IP address and port.

Radware LinkProof NG link load balancer cloud-based applications, is a multi-homing and enterprise gateway solution that offers service level availability and continuous connectivity of enterprise. It is an application-aware multi-homing and link load balancing module that delivers WAN optimization for 24/7 continuous connectivity and service level assurance for corporate and cloud-based applications. LinkProof NG scales from 100Mbps up to 160Gbps and can be deployed in entry-level to high-end data centers as well as enterprise branch offices.
Offer
Learn more about Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
Learn more about Radware LinkProof
Sample Customers
Lilly, AccuWeather, AIRFRANCE, Honeywell, Papa John's, OSRAM, ADP, NYLS
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company46%
Comms Service Provider10%
Media Company7%
Government5%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Citrix, A10 Networks and others in Application Delivery Controllers. Updated: June 2020.
425,660 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers vendors.

We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.