We performed a comparison between Microsoft Intune and OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Microsoft, HCLTech and others in Configuration Management."A valuable feature is user enrollment, where users can enroll their devices in their organizations themselves."
"Microsoft Endpoint Manager is not expensive overall, especially for small environments."
"The standout features of Intune are its excellent mobile device management and highly effective application management capabilities."
"The ability to wipe data from and reset devices is one of the most important and valuable features. If a device is reported stolen, we can freeze it or wipe the data from it, preventing data leakage."
"We already use a lot of Microsoft products in our company, and therefore, it made sense to also use this product."
"The most valuable feature is the UEM capabilities."
"The solution is easy to use."
"There has been a noticeable increase in productivity for both my organization and clients."
"Helps me perform changes in connected infrastructure thanks to the discovery features."
"The most valuable feature is the impact analysis."
"There are a few security features that are not available in Microsoft Intune, when compared to other products."
"For an existing customer who has an SCCM, it would need to be upgraded to an MECM first before I can introduce Microsoft Intune."
"Lacks the ability to deploy more ways of management, managing devices and processing the policies."
"There are a lot of small use cases where we realized that some technical solution was missing in Microsoft in comparison to other products. For example, it lacks something similar to sensing or location-based rules and configurations."
"The reporting could be improved, as it's pretty poor compared to other products of this type."
"In terms of what can be improved, I am looking for better enhancements regarding Apple management, not only on the mobile device, but also on the laptop."
"Technical support is not that great."
"The installation is very easy. However, to be able to configure it you will need special knowledge, such as training or self-studies to have a proper level of security. There are many settings one has to understand before being able to implement Microsoft Intune."
"The native UI should be simplified because it is outdated and a little bit over-complicated."
More OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Microsoft Intune is ranked 3rd in Configuration Management with 164 reviews while OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management is ranked 21st in Configuration Management. Microsoft Intune is rated 8.0, while OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Intune writes "We can manage all aspects of our devices from a single console, easy to scale, and quick to deploy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management writes "It allows us to deploy applications and primitive desktops globally. The upgrade cycle is very long". Microsoft Intune is most compared with Jamf Pro, VMware Workspace ONE, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, SOTI MobiControl and Microsoft Entra ID, whereas OpenText ZENworks Configuration Management is most compared with Microsoft Configuration Manager, Quest KACE Systems Management and BigFix.
See our list of best Configuration Management vendors.
We monitor all Configuration Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.