We performed a comparison between Microsoft Secure Score and RSA Archer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, BitSight, AuditBoard and others in IT Vendor Risk Management."Microsoft Secure Score's most valuable feature is identity."
"The most valuable features of RSA Archer are the asset management, risk management, and vendor management."
"One of the useful features is the ability to connect to various systems in order to accommodate data."
"Enables development of any application, automation of any workflow including the GRC work processes."
"I have found all the features to be valuable, including those involving reporting, the dashboard, notifications, email modules, the database and data input."
"Integration is another great aspect of RSA Archer. From the beginning, integration has been a central focus for RSA, and Archer has always integrated well with most tools on the market today."
"It is a very friendly tool. We can easily understand what is going on inside the tool. I like this tool. We can work with the tool for the ERP platform. We can create automated applications based on the requirements."
"The Advance Workflow feature simplifies things."
"Good dashboards and reporting features; it's easy to gather reports quickly."
"They could indicate whether a recommendation aligns with different compliance standards."
"An area for improvement would be the user interface. They could also offer more on-demand applications free of cost."
"I find the tech support to be inadequately knowledgeable."
"Recently, we made a suggestion for cross references, like for one application to another. There were limitations there, so we're hoping that will be included in the next upgrade."
"RSA Archer might be a bit expensive for small companies because it's a vast tool."
"It would be useful for customers if COBIT 2019 could be translated into different languages."
"There is no inbuilt alert in Archer to let us know that a data feed has failed or did not run for different reasons. So, we don't even get to know that a feed has not run until somebody reports it to us. This has been a problem all the time. Data feeds have always been a big headache for us because there is no feature to let us know if a feed has not run or has failed. If Archer had a feature to send us an email notification when a feed has failed, it would've been very helpful. This is the reason why our users are slowly moving away to another platform. Some of the modules that I have been managing are being moved to ServiceNow. Next year, a lot of our modules will be moved from RSA Archer to ServiceNow, and the data feed issue has been one of the main reasons."
"The bullet chart is the best graph for my purposes, and it should be available for inclusion in the dashboards."
"There were so many problems that we had found. One time, the search index was not working. We also faced slowness in Archer, but I resolved this issue."
Microsoft Secure Score is ranked 6th in IT Vendor Risk Management with 1 review while RSA Archer is ranked 1st in IT Vendor Risk Management with 38 reviews. Microsoft Secure Score is rated 9.0, while RSA Archer is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Secure Score writes "Stable product with a valuable identity feature ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Archer writes "A rich application with good workflow, but search feature needs improvement". Microsoft Secure Score is most compared with Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management and Amazon Inspector, whereas RSA Archer is most compared with OneTrust GRC, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, Workiva Wdesk and AuditBoard.
See our list of best IT Vendor Risk Management vendors.
We monitor all IT Vendor Risk Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.