We performed a comparison between Microsoft Teams and SAP Jam based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Slack and others in Enterprise Social Software."The group chat is very good."
"Microsoft Teams can facilitate the broadcast of information and distribution of tasks through a single platform."
"The solution's most valuable feature is connecting calls to concerned people anytime. It works much faster."
"The most valuable features are the messaging and the video calling, especially where you can add a background."
"We like it because it makes it easy to communicate, chat, make video calls, and schedule meetings with people."
"The solution helps us to accelerate communication. We use Teams to contact colleagues during emergencies instead of regular electronic phones. It helps to keep everything organized and centralized in the same place. The product is also very easy to use. I am also impressed with the solution's possibility of making quick calls and creating groups."
"The integration, ability to share documents is very good."
"The solution is simple and present in many devices at one time."
"One notable feature is the "improvement training," which allows you to define groups, facilitate information sharing, enable participant rating, and establish rankings. This enables you to identify which participants are actively engaged and sharing information and which ones are less active."
"There could be performance spikes and better reliability. We saw a lot of stability issues."
"The solution's stability can be better."
"The product needs to improve its security."
"It would be good if the solution had some sort of AI built into it while taking the transcript so that at least the sentences made sense."
"I have faced issues with connection. Maybe, it's an issue from my side. The company accounts in Teams has some issues as well. I could not establish calls with certain domains, and then the product asked me to buy a professional account. The problem with Teams is that they are split between professional or company accounts and personal accounts. It's not very clear how you can go from one to another. That's the main issue with teams."
"The way we test the audio devices must be improved."
"The integration with SharePoint can be cumbersome at times."
"At times, we encounter difficulties with remote access through Teams, which requires improvement."
"I'm hopeful for more integrations with SAP JAM in the future."
Microsoft Teams is ranked 1st in Enterprise Social Software with 145 reviews while SAP Jam is ranked 7th in Enterprise Social Software with 5 reviews. Microsoft Teams is rated 8.2, while SAP Jam is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Teams writes "Great for project planning and monitoring with easy communication capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Jam writes "A powerful tool for managing subscriptions within the organization". Microsoft Teams is most compared with Atlassian Confluence, SharePoint, Symphony, Loom and Chatter, whereas SAP Jam is most compared with SharePoint, Yammer, Adobe Experience Manager and Microsoft 365 Business.
See our list of best Enterprise Social Software vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Social Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
