Compare MinIO vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
MinIO Logo
8,964 views|7,918 comparisons
Pure Storage FlashBlade Logo
5,909 views|3,705 comparisons
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about MinIO vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
535,015 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable feature is the ease of management and administration.""The ability to spawn a MinIO Tenant on demand and shut it down right after is most valuable.""Good interface and a good approach to development and testing environments.""Very good at object retrieval."

More MinIO Pros »

"It uses the same platform for connectivity so integration is seamless.""The initial setup is pretty quick.""It's very easy-to-use.""The most valuable features are the Metro clustering, and disaster recovery.""The main feature I have found to be product replication.""It performs well and it is also very fast."

More Pure Storage FlashBlade Pros »

Cons
"The monitoring capability is really bad and needs to be improved.""There should be the ability to expand the size after it has already been deployed. Currently, you cannot do that. It doesn't support an increase in size. Each time we spawn a new MinIO, we need to track the particular MinIO instance or tenant that has the file. Therefore, we had to create a multi-tenant solution that tracks the MinIO that has our artifacts. It isn't in one single instance. It should have better multi-tenancy support.""Documentation could be improved.""The solution lacks documentation."

More MinIO Cons »

"It's on the expensive side, as expected for a niche product.""Compared to, for example, Hitachi NAS, the solution is not mature at all. It's just in its infancy as far as technology goes.""The feature that we're waiting on is better integration with the cell services.""It would be nice if you could store file-based in the same box with the same technology.""There could be improvements in public cloud integration.""I would like to see the licensing fees improved as well as the price per terabytes."

More Pure Storage FlashBlade Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"This is an open-source solution but I am using the licensed version."

More MinIO Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The price is a little high.""In my opinion, we have paid the right price for the product. I don't think that it is too much or too little.""The price of this solution could be made more affordable.""Licensing fees are paid yearly."

More Pure Storage FlashBlade Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs.
535,015 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The ability to spawn a MinIO Tenant on demand and shut it down right after is most valuable.
Top Answer: There should be the ability to expand the size after it has already been deployed. Currently, you cannot do that. It doesn't support an increase in size. Each time we spawn a new MinIO, we need to… more »
Top Answer: We used it for machine learning artifacts in terms of model weights and the model outputs for visualizations for ephemeral tasks. I was using it less than a year ago, and it was the latest open-source… more »
Top Answer: The main feature I have found to be product replication.
Top Answer: The price of this solution could be made more affordable.
Top Answer: There could be improvements in public cloud integration. In the future, one innovation could be for them to make an embedded backup system.
Ranking
4th
Views
8,964
Comparisons
7,918
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
526
Rating
8.5
1st
Views
5,909
Comparisons
3,705
Reviews
9
Average Words per Review
426
Rating
9.0
Comparisons
Learn More
MinIO
Video Not Available
Overview

MinIO is a high performance, distributed object storage system. It is software-defined, runs on industry standard hardware and is 100% open source under the Apache V2 license.

MinIO is different in that it was designed from its inception to be the standard in private cloud object storage. Because MinIO is purpose-built to serve only objects, a single-layer architecture achieves all of the necessary functionality without compromise. The result is a cloud-native object server that is simultaneously performant, scalable and lightweight.

While MinIO excels at traditional object storage use cases like secondary storage, disaster recovery and archiving, it is unique at overcoming the private cloud challenges associated with machine learning, analytics and cloud-native application workloads.

FlashBlade is the industry’s most advanced scale-out storage for unstructured data, powered by a modern, massively parallel architecture to consolidate complex data silos (like backup appliances and data lakes) and accelerate tomorrow’s discoveries and insights.

Offer
Learn more about MinIO
Learn more about Pure Storage FlashBlade
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
ServiceNow, Mercedes-AMG Petronas Motorsport, Dominos, Man AHL
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider29%
Computer Software Company24%
Manufacturing Company9%
Financial Services Firm7%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm21%
University14%
Pharma/Biotech Company7%
Marketing Services Firm7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider15%
Manufacturing Company8%
Government6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise35%
Large Enterprise48%
Find out what your peers are saying about MinIO vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade and other solutions. Updated: September 2021.
535,015 professionals have used our research since 2012.

MinIO is ranked 4th in File and Object Storage with 4 reviews while Pure Storage FlashBlade is ranked 1st in File and Object Storage with 6 reviews. MinIO is rated 8.0, while Pure Storage FlashBlade is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of MinIO writes "Offers good object retrieval performance and scalability; but native monitoring tools don't work above a certain bucket size". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pure Storage FlashBlade writes "Stable with good technical support and easy to manage". MinIO is most compared with Red Hat Ceph Storage, Scality RING8, SwiftStack, NetApp StorageGRID and Hitachi Content Platform, whereas Pure Storage FlashBlade is most compared with Pure Storage FlashArray, HPE Primera, Red Hat Ceph Storage, Dell EMC PowerStore and NetApp AFF (All Flash FAS). See our MinIO vs. Pure Storage FlashBlade report.

See our list of best File and Object Storage vendors.

We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.