We performed a comparison between MuleSoft Composer and Oracle Integration Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product is easy to use. You don't need programming skills to use it."
"The prebuilt connectors have saved our customers a lot of time and money."
"The advantage of using MuleSoft as part as the Salesforce ecosystem is that anything new they build is guaranteed to work with the new features that are coming from the other side."
"People are able to scale up, learn it quickly, and start delivering."
"OIC's accuracy is quite good."
"The out-of-box integration between Oracle and SAP is really beneficial"
"Provides various ways to secure services as well as providing extensive support."
"The Oracle integration tool is the most comfortable tool for using those Oracle products."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of customization."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service integrates well and is user-friendly. If you are not a developer or ops engineer you can still use the solution with ease. You do not need to have developers' knowledge, you can easily adapt and learn quickly to integrate the services. They have good documentation."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service is a really good product and the ROI is very good with it. It lowers development time. A development cycle that may have taken a year without Oracle Integration Cloud Service can drop down to three or four months with it."
"MuleSoft Composer needs to improve its interface and scalability."
"This solution could be improved by offering more integrations with other platforms."
"The technical support team's response time must be improved."
"We would love to have more and more ready-to-use interfaces from Oracle."
"Lacks features for more complex integrations."
"Dealing with the large file size has occasionally been a challenge."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service can improve file handling. Currently, our real-time file polling limitation is 10 MB, if that size can be increased it would be helpful. For example, increasing the size from 10 MB to 1 GB."
"Sometimes, the tech support is slow to get back to us. We have had to wait up to two weeks for a response."
"Configurable timeouts on each connection would be good."
"They should provide tutorials for beginners to learn about the processes."
"It would be helpful if there were more tutorials or documentation to learn about Oracle Integration Cloud Service."
More Oracle Integration Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
MuleSoft Composer is ranked 9th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 3 reviews while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is ranked 3rd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 32 reviews. MuleSoft Composer is rated 7.6, while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of MuleSoft Composer writes "The prebuilt connectors save a lot of time and money, but the customer support and price must be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Integration Cloud Service writes "An integration tool that is highly compatible and easy to maintain". MuleSoft Composer is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, Workato, Celigo Integration Platform, Zapier and Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, whereas Oracle Integration Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), Mule Anypoint Platform, AWS Glue, Oracle GoldenGate and Azure Data Factory. See our MuleSoft Composer vs. Oracle Integration Cloud Service report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.