Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewall vs pfSense

Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewall is ranked 23rd in Firewalls with 2 reviews vs pfSense which is ranked 4th in Firewalls with 22 reviews. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewall writes "Meets our expectations, providing application control, antivirus, and content filtering". The top reviewer of pfSense writes "The performance and functionality are good. I can manage it easily by myself". Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewall is most compared with Meraki MX Firewalls and Fortinet FortiGate. pfSense is most compared with Sophos UTM, Fortinet FortiGate and Cisco ASA.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Cisco, Sophos and others in Firewalls.
287,741 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewall vs pfSense

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
It has the typical features of a next-generation firewall. It can do application control, antivirus, content filtering, etc.I like to install Palo Alto mainly on the data center side to have visibility into all VLANs. That gives full visibility into the core.

Read more »

The most valuable feature is the fact that it's very easy to manage. I don't have to have highly trained engineers. A mid-level employee who is conversant with firewalls can take care of managing it.Stability has been excellent. We have experienced no issues; it never fails.Its features rival many of the high cost solutions out there.The initial setup was straightforward, therefore I wanted to continue using the product.I can manage it easily by myself.The performance and functionality are good.Creation of certificates and the facility to administer services are valuable features.It is a good firewall with good performance.

Read more »

Cons
I would like to see more in terms of reporting tools and the threat analysis capabilities.I'm thinking about a new feature. They have decryption. It's a good idea to use decryption on Palo Alto. It would be good if they had offloading of the traffic, and if they could decrypt the traffic and offload it. Like, for example, ASM on our site. We have an SSL decryption to offload the traffic. We could use that on Palo Alto.

Read more »

They need to take care of a few issues with the GUI, and occasionally they don't update the configurations properly. I would also like them to firm up the VPN aspect of the software just a bit and provide better monitoring software.It is not centrally managed, where you log into the website and can see all your services there. We would like to be able to see is all the configurations from a central interface on all our pfSenses.The GUI could use improvements, though it is manageable.A malware blocker should be included. I do not know if it is included yet. However, until now, we have not experienced a large malware invasion.It requires more attention to provide a better alternative for open source to small government or educational institutions with reduced budgets in terms of technology.Needs services on additional features, such as managing inventory and generating reports.My only observation is about the quality of the IPSec logs, which are difficult to interpret and are poor in filters.​Improve analysis of logs and dashboards (control panel) with improved alert functionality.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
In comparison to a lot of other solutions, it's very inexpensive.It is a free solution.It is economical (i.e., free).From Sonic Wall, their price is much higher, because for every feature that you want to add, you have to pay. I can do the same things with pfSense, but everything is included in one price.There are a few features not included, and when you have to use those features, you have to pay for them.It is an open source solution. Therefore, the price is good.It works quite well for an open source product.If you need to buy hardware onto which to install PfSense, go with their boxes on their website, they are great.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewalls solutions are best for your needs.
287,741 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
120
Comparisons
45
Reviews
1
Followers
18
Avg. Rating
8.0
Views
69,608
Comparisons
46,426
Reviews
21
Followers
2,984
Avg. Rating
8.6
Top Comparisons
Top ComparisonsSee more Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewall competitors »
Compared 30% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
See more pfSense competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsPalo Alto Networks NGFW, Palo Alto Networks PA-Series
Website/Video
Website/VideoPalo Alto Networks
pfSense
Overview
Overview

Palo Alto Networks' next-generation firewalls secure your business with a prevention-focused architecture and integrated innovations that are easy to deploy and use. Now, you can accelerate growth and eliminate risks at the same time.

Providing comprehensive network security solutions for the enterprise, large business and SOHO, pfSense solutions bring together the most advanced technology available to make protecting your network easier than ever before. Our products are built on the most reliable platforms and are engineered to provide the highest levels of performance, stability and confidence.
OFFER
Learn more about Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewall
Learn more about pfSense
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersSkiStar AB, Ada County, Global IT Services PSF, Southern Cross Hospitals, Verge Health, University of Portsmouth, Austrian Airlines, The Heinz EndowmentsNerds On Site Inc., RKC Development Inc., Expertech, Fisher's Technology, Ncisive, Consulting, CPURX, Vaughn's Computer House Calls, Imeretech LLC, Digital Crisis, Carolina Digital Phone, Technigogo Technology Services, The Simple Solution, SwiftecITInc, Rocky Mountain Tech Team, Free Range Geeks, Alaska Computer Geeks, Lark Information Technology, Renaissance Systems Inc., Cutting Edge Computers, Caretech LLC, GoVanguard, Network Touch Ltd, P.C. Solutions.Net, Vision Voice and Data Systems LLC, Montgomery Technologies, Techforce, Concero Networks, ASONInc, CPS Electronics and Consulting, Darkwire.net LLC, IT Specialists, MBS-Net Inc., VOICE1 LLC, Advantage Networking Inc., Powerhouse Systems, Doxa Multimedia Inc., Pro Computer Service, Virtual IT Services, A&J Computers Inc., Envision IT LLC, CommunicaONE Inc., Bone Computer Inc., Amax Engineering Corporation, QPG Ltd. Co., IT 101 Inc., Perfect Cloud Solutions, Applied Technology Group Inc., The Digital Sun Group LLC, Firespring
Top Industries
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider
16%
University
16%
Healthcare Company
11%
Energy/Utilities Company
11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider
15%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Non Tech Company
6%
Company Size
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business
67%
Midsize Enterprise
21%
Large Enterprise
12%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
39%
Midsize Enterprise
37%
Large Enterprise
23%
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Cisco, Sophos and others in Firewalls.
Download now
287,741 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email