Panaya Test Dynamix vs UFT (QTP)

Panaya Test Dynamix is ranked 25th in Functional Testing Tools with 1 review vs UFT (QTP) which is ranked 1st in Functional Testing Tools with 17 reviews. The top reviewer of Panaya Test Dynamix writes "Provides better monitoring for testing campaigns and business process testing". The top reviewer of UFT (QTP) writes "With regularly occurring application releases, any QA team member can execute tests (regression suites) stored in ALM/Quality Center, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results". Panaya Test Dynamix is most compared with Worksoft Certify. UFT (QTP) is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, SmartBear TestComplete and Worksoft Certify.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools.
288,073 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing Panaya Test Dynamix vs UFT (QTP)

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
Test migration from HPE are done automatically. We can extract our tests from HPE, and they convert it into the Panaya format.It is easy for business users to use who are not familiar with testing tools.Provides better monitoring for testing campaigns and business process testing.

Read more »

We have used it for the web and Windows-based applications. It is very productive in terms of execution.​Record and Replay to ease onboarding of new users.Object Repository Technology, which is a good mean to identify graphical components of the applications under test.With frequent releases, using automation to perform regression testing can save us huge amount of time and resources.Hidden among the kitchen sink of features is a new Data Generation tool called the Test Combinations Generator.I like the fact that we can use LeanFT with our UFT licenses as well.Being able to automate different applications makes day-to-day activities a lot easier.The most valuable features for us are the GUI, the easy identification of objects, and folder structure creation.

Read more »

Cons
They provide options for custom fields or tabs, but customization of workflows would be great.Support is reactive and in English only.

Read more »

Needs to improve the integration with the CI/CD pipeline (VSTS and report generation).I would like to have detailed description provided to test the cloud-based applications.Scripting has become more complex from a maintenance standpoint to support additional browsers.Jumping to functions is supported from any Action/BPT Component code, but not from inside a function library where the target function exists in another library file. Workaround: Select search entire project for the function.I'd like to see UFT integrated more with some of the open source tools like Selenium, where web is involved.Perhaps more coverage as far as different languages go. I'm talking more about object identification.It doesn’t support Telerik UI controls and we are currently looking for a patch for this.You have to deal with issues such as the firewall and how can the tool talk with the application, i.e., if the application is on a company network and so on. That, of course, is important to figure out.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
For the price of five automation licenses, you simply would not be able to hire five manual testers for two years worth of 24/7 manual testing work on demand.It's an expensive solution.The licensing and pricing model is confusing.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
288,073 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
127
Comparisons
88
Reviews
1
Followers
47
Avg. Rating
10.0
Views
43,836
Comparisons
20,404
Reviews
19
Followers
1,863
Avg. Rating
8.2
Top Comparisons
Top ComparisonsSee more Panaya Test Dynamix competitors »
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
See more UFT (QTP) competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsPanaya Test CenterMicro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)
Website/Video
Website/VideoPanaya
Micro Focus
Overview
Overview

With Panaya Test Dynamix, accelerate and standardize packaged application testing without compromising on scope or quality. By encompassing the needs of all stakeholders and integrating standardized testing processes for both technical IT and Business users, Panaya reduces overall testing efforts by 30-50%.

QuickTest Professional is now known as Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing, and is an automated testing tool that provides unified AI, GUI, and Business Process testing.

With QuickTest Professional, you can free up IT resources to focus on other areas, while the automated software takes care of all your application software testing requirements. Testing happens continuously and quickly, and so nips any potential issues in the bud. QuickTest Professional saves money and time, and optimizes business productivity and overall user experience.

OFFER
Learn more about Panaya Test Dynamix
Learn more about UFT (QTP)
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersAllianz Global Investors, AGC (Asahi Glass Company), OTTO Office, Etablissement Français du Sang, Eissmann Group Automotive, Aritzia, ABB Brazil CSS Insurance, Revolution IT, Credit Suisse, and General Electric Company.
Top Industries
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm
36%
Healthcare Company
14%
Retailer
14%
Insurance Company
14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company
43%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Healthcare Company
5%
Pharma/Biotech Company
5%
Company Size
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business
12%
Midsize Enterprise
17%
Large Enterprise
71%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
7%
Midsize Enterprise
11%
Large Enterprise
83%
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools.
Download now
288,073 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email