Compare Panaya Test Dynamix vs. UFT (QTP)

Panaya Test Dynamix is ranked 19th in Functional Testing Tools with 2 reviews while UFT (QTP) is ranked 2nd in Functional Testing Tools with 9 reviews. Panaya Test Dynamix is rated 9.0, while UFT (QTP) is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Panaya Test Dynamix writes "I get a consolidated view and reporting and it enables us to build a workflow that we can customize to our requirements". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UFT (QTP) writes "With regularly occurring application releases, any QA team member can execute tests (regression suites) stored in ALM/Quality Center, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results". Panaya Test Dynamix is most compared with UFT (QTP), Worksoft Certify and Tricentis Tosca, whereas UFT (QTP) is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, SmartBear TestComplete and UFT Pro (LeanFT).
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Panaya Test Dynamix Logo
551 views|265 comparisons
UFT (QTP) Logo
25,709 views|15,689 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Worksoft, Micro Focus, Tricentis and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: September 2019.
365,820 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The initial setup was not complex and the product itself is very easy to configure and use.Test migration from HPE are done automatically. We can extract our tests from HPE, and they convert it into the Panaya format.It is easy for business users to use who are not familiar with testing tools.Provides better monitoring for testing campaigns and business process testing.

Read more »

We have used it for the web and Windows-based applications. It is very productive in terms of execution.​Record and Replay to ease onboarding of new users.Object Repository Technology, which is a good mean to identify graphical components of the applications under test.With frequent releases, using automation to perform regression testing can save us huge amount of time and resources.Hidden among the kitchen sink of features is a new Data Generation tool called the Test Combinations Generator.I like the fact that we can use LeanFT with our UFT licenses as well.Being able to automate different applications makes day-to-day activities a lot easier.

Read more »

Cons
They provide options for custom fields or tabs, but customization of workflows would be great.Support is reactive and in English only.

Read more »

Needs to improve the integration with the CI/CD pipeline (VSTS and report generation).I would like to have detailed description provided to test the cloud-based applications.Scripting has become more complex from a maintenance standpoint to support additional browsers.Jumping to functions is supported from any Action/BPT Component code, but not from inside a function library where the target function exists in another library file. Workaround: Select search entire project for the function.I'd like to see UFT integrated more with some of the open source tools like Selenium, where web is involved.Perhaps more coverage as far as different languages go. I'm talking more about object identification.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The solution is rather expensive due to the security it has to offer.

Read more »

For the price of five automation licenses, you simply would not be able to hire five manual testers for two years worth of 24/7 manual testing work on demand.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
365,820 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
19th
Views
551
Comparisons
265
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
264
Avg. Rating
10.0
2nd
Views
25,709
Comparisons
15,689
Reviews
9
Average Words per Review
915
Avg. Rating
8.9
Top Comparisons
Compared 41% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Also Known As
Panaya Test CenterMicro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)
Learn
Panaya
Micro Focus
Overview

With Panaya Test Dynamix, accelerate and standardize packaged application testing without compromising on scope or quality. By encompassing the needs of all stakeholders and integrating standardized testing processes for both technical IT and Business users, Panaya reduces overall testing efforts by 30-50%.

QuickTest Professional is now known as Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing, and is an automated testing tool that provides unified AI, GUI, and Business Process testing.

With QuickTest Professional, you can free up IT resources to focus on other areas, while the automated software takes care of all your application software testing requirements. Testing happens continuously and quickly, and so nips any potential issues in the bud. QuickTest Professional saves money and time, and optimizes business productivity and overall user experience.

Offer
Learn more about Panaya Test Dynamix
Learn More About UFT

Fill out the form to view the report

Sample Customers
Allianz Global Investors, AGC (Asahi Glass Company), OTTO Office, Etablissement Français du Sang, Eissmann Group Automotive, Aritzia, ABB Brazil CSS Insurance, Revolution IT, Credit Suisse, and General Electric Company.
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm36%
Insurance Company14%
Healthcare Company14%
Retailer14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company26%
Financial Services Firm17%
Manufacturing Company14%
Healthcare Company7%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise69%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business8%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise84%
Find out what your peers are saying about Worksoft, Micro Focus, Tricentis and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: September 2019.
365,820 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email