Panaya Test Dynamix vs Selenium HQ

Panaya Test Dynamix is ranked 23rd in Functional Testing Tools with 1 review vs Selenium HQ which is ranked 5th in Functional Testing Tools with 13 reviews. The top reviewer of Panaya Test Dynamix writes "Provides better monitoring for testing campaigns and business process testing". The top reviewer of Selenium HQ writes "Provides Freedom To Choose The Tools Needed For Full-Fledged Automation Framework". Panaya Test Dynamix is most compared with Worksoft Certify. Selenium HQ is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, UFT Pro (LeanFT) and SmartBear TestComplete.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools.
291,145 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing Panaya Test Dynamix vs Selenium HQ

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
Test migration from HPE are done automatically. We can extract our tests from HPE, and they convert it into the Panaya format.It is easy for business users to use who are not familiar with testing tools.Provides better monitoring for testing campaigns and business process testing.

Read more »

The primary benefit is its cost and the ability to use the cloud.Our platform runs into several thousand screens and a few thousand test cases, something which would typically take months to test manually. As of today, the entire process takes a little over two days to run.Selenium has helped to complete tests in less time, which would not be possible relying on manual testing only.It is programming language agnostic, you can write tests in most currently used languages.It has helped to complete tests in less time, which would not be possible relying on manual testing only.It supports most of the mainstream browsers such as Chrome, Firefox, IE and etc.Selenium web driver - Java.Language support - since it supports Java and other programming languages it is easy to integrate with other systems.

Read more »

Cons
They provide options for custom fields or tabs, but customization of workflows would be great.Support is reactive and in English only.

Read more »

It does require a programming skill set. I would like the product not to require a heavy programming skill set and be more user-friendly for someone without a programming background.In the beginning, we had issues with several test cases failing during regression. Over a period of time, we built our own framework around Selenium which helped us overcome of these issues.Improvement in Selenium's ability to identify and wait for the page/element to load would be a big plus. This would ensure that our failed test cases will drop by 60%.It would be very great if Selenium would provide some framework examples so newcomers could get started more quickly.​To simplify the development process, everyone needs to do a Selenium Framework to acquire the web application functions and features from Selenium methods.It is not easy to make IE plus Selenium work good as other browsers. Firefox and Chrome are the best ones to work with Selenium.Handling frames and windows needs to be improved.There is no good tool to find the Xpath. They should provide a good tool to find Xpath for dynamic elements and integrate API (REST/ SOAP) testing support.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
This product is open source and free. That was a huge deciding factor for us getting into it.It is free.Since it is an open source. It is free to use. However my company see it as the future of load testing.It's open-source, so there's no need to pay for a license.There is no pricing cost. License is Apache License 2.0.It is free to use.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
291,145 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
155
Comparisons
99
Reviews
1
Followers
48
Avg. Rating
10.0
Views
22,048
Comparisons
14,147
Reviews
13
Followers
1,040
Avg. Rating
8.5
Top Comparisons
Top ComparisonsSee more Panaya Test Dynamix competitors »
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
See more Selenium HQ competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsPanaya Test CenterSeleniumHQ
Website/Video
Website/VideoPanaya
SeleniumHQ
Overview
Overview

With Panaya Test Dynamix, accelerate and standardize packaged application testing without compromising on scope or quality. By encompassing the needs of all stakeholders and integrating standardized testing processes for both technical IT and Business users, Panaya reduces overall testing efforts by 30-50%.

Selenium HQ is a suite of tools to automate web browsers across many platforms. Selenium runs in many browsers and operating systems and can be controlled by many programming languages and testing frameworks. Selenium consist of two types:

  1. Selenium WebDriver - create robust, browser-based regression automation suites & tests and scale & distribute scripts across many environments.
  2. Selenium IDE - create quick bug reproduction scripts and create scripts to aid in automation-aided exploratory testing.
OFFER
Learn more about Panaya Test Dynamix
Learn more about Selenium HQ
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersAllianz Global Investors, AGC (Asahi Glass Company), OTTO Office, Etablissement Français du Sang, Eissmann Group Automotive, Aritzia, ABB BrazilBrowserStack, Sauce Labs, experitest, Tricentis GmbH, SmartBear Software
Top Industries
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Retailer
20%
Software R&D Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Manufacturing Company
13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
23%
Comms Service Provider
17%
Software R&D Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Company Size
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business
24%
Midsize Enterprise
33%
Large Enterprise
43%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
13%
Midsize Enterprise
33%
Large Enterprise
54%
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools.
Download now
291,145 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email