Compare Perforce QA Wizard Pro vs. Selenium HQ

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: October 2020.
442,845 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable feature is the option to pull changes from others or make local changes in your own change list."

More Perforce QA Wizard Pro Pros »

"The initial setup is straightforward. Deployment took about seven months.""You can build your own framework. I think that's the most powerful feature. You can connect with a lot of other tools that use frameworks, or keywords, etc. That helps make it a stronger solution.""The most valuable aspect of Selenium is that it gives you the flexibility to customize or write your own code, your own features, etc. It's not restricted by licensing.""The solution is very flexible; there are different ways of using it. It's open-source and has a lot of support on offer.""The most valuable feature is the Selenium grid, which allows us to run tests in parallel.""Ability to integrate with every other tool.""What I like the most about this product is that it gives us a lot of freedom to code anything, there is no restriction on the type of function you can do.""I like that it is a robust and free open source. There is a lot of community support available, and there are a lot of developers using them. There's good community support."

More Selenium HQ Pros »

Cons
"It would be very helpful if a queue was implemented to handle, for example, 100 requests at the same time."

More Perforce QA Wizard Pro Cons »

"Technical support isn't very good. Sometimes their recommendations were not very clear.""The solution is open-source, so everyone relies on the community to assist with troubleshooting and information sharing. If there's a complex issue no one has faced, it may take a while to solve the problem.""The solution's UI path needs to be modernized.""The solution does not offer up enough information in regards to personality testing.""I would like to see XPath made more reliable so that it can be used in all browsers.""Could have additional readability and abstraction.""Selenium is good when the team is really technical because Selenium does less built-in methods. If it came with more built-in and pre-built methods it would be even easier for less technical people to work with it. That's where I think the improvement can be.""There should be standardized frameworks to build automation."

More Selenium HQ Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"We are satisfied with the pricing.""It's an open-source tool that you can work with at any time without any cost."

More Selenium HQ Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
442,845 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is the option to pull changes from others or make local changes in your own change list.
Top Answer: The biggest problems with this solution have to do with scale. If the load is high then your request is put on hold for a second, and then you have to handle it. If you make a lot of requests then it… more »
Top Answer: Perforce is part of an old fashioned system that is not fully in the cloud. I would not suggest others use it unless they have some other solution for cloud integration. I would rate this solution a… more »
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is the Selenium grid, which allows us to run tests in parallel.
Top Answer: The solution is open-source; you don't have to pay a licensing fee.
Top Answer: I would like to see XPath made more reliable so that it can be used in all browsers.
Ranking
29th
Views
59
Comparisons
21
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
468
Avg. Rating
5.0
6th
Views
15,410
Comparisons
12,646
Reviews
9
Average Words per Review
441
Avg. Rating
7.6
Popular Comparisons
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Also Known As
SeleniumHQ
Learn
Perforce
SeleniumHQ
Video Not Available
Overview

QA Wizard Pro automates functional and regression testing of web, Windows, and Java applications, and load test web applications.

Selenium HQ is a suite of tools to automate web browsers across many platforms. Selenium runs in many browsers and operating systems and can be controlled by many programming languages and testing frameworks. Selenium consist of two types:

  1. Selenium WebDriver - create robust, browser-based regression automation suites & tests and scale & distribute scripts across many environments.
  2. Selenium IDE - create quick bug reproduction scripts and create scripts to aid in automation-aided exploratory testing.
Offer
Learn more about Perforce QA Wizard Pro
Learn more about Selenium HQ
Sample Customers
Ubisoft, Expedia, Honda, Samsung,CitrixBrowserStack, Sauce Labs, experitest, Tricentis GmbH, SmartBear Software
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm30%
Retailer17%
Computer Software Company13%
Comms Service Provider9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company40%
Comms Service Provider11%
Financial Services Firm7%
Government6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business24%
Midsize Enterprise31%
Large Enterprise45%
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: October 2020.
442,845 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Perforce QA Wizard Pro is ranked 29th in Functional Testing Tools with 1 review while Selenium HQ is ranked 6th in Functional Testing Tools with 11 reviews. Perforce QA Wizard Pro is rated 5.0, while Selenium HQ is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Perforce QA Wizard Pro writes "Shared change lists are helpful, but poor scalability leads to problems with instability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Selenium HQ writes "Gives a lot of freedom to code anything, there is no restriction on the type of function you can do". Perforce QA Wizard Pro is most compared with , whereas Selenium HQ is most compared with Eggplant Functional, Tricentis Tosca, Worksoft Certify, Telerik Test Studio and Silk Test.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.