Compare PTC Integrity vs. Rally Software
PTC Integrity is ranked 13th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 1 review while Rally Software is ranked 4th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 20 reviews. PTC Integrity is rated 5.0, while Rally Software is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of PTC Integrity writes "Good item management and version control but does not have good performance ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rally Software writes "Streamlines defining user stories and tracking sprints, but dependency flagging should be easier". PTC Integrity is most compared with JIRA, Polarion ALM and TFS, whereas Rally Software is most compared with JIRA, TFS and Microsoft Azure DevOps.
Most Helpful Review | |||
Use PTC Integrity? Share your opinion. |
| ||
 Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Micro Focus, Microsoft and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: November 2019. 382,547 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros | |
We have been using it because it gives certain abilities in the automotive industry, such as auditing or keeping track of information. | Reporting is much easier and faster than Micro Focus ALM, with CA AC built on web services... Also, the data is more granular when it comes to tasks, iterations, sprints, and releases. I was able to create epics for our budgeting concerns and it helped me link everything together. Having that view into features and roadmap from product to delivery teams, and where they are going, then execute on. Its ability to scale. Tech support is very responsive, helpful, and available. It helps with getting the alignment between strategy and execution for the product teams, all the way down to the delivery teams. CA Agile Central provides visibility into how teams are meeting business objectives. CA Agile Central helps the entire organization run like one powerful team. |
Cons | |
To be honest, the third controller system is kind of old. There are lots of transactional changes that have not been implemented in PTC. If you have a larger project, for example, whenever you give bits and need to change 10,000 files you can just commit them. But here the work style is a little more file based, so you'll have to take care of almost all the files individually. It's not a single commit like you do here, but rather you have to allocate time for each component or file that you want to check in or commit. That's a very big issue. | One problem I see is that if there is a dependent user story - for example, if my team is working on one thing and there is a dependent user story from another team - we can have a dependency created but we don't know if there is a change of status from the other team. That is something which is very important for Agile Central to look into so that if the other team makes any changes we will be notified as well. I think there is a missing link with the development activity. Some developers are pushing in new versions of the code, but you cannot make the link from the user story to a specific application version. A lot of the features that we would be looking to add, I am learning may not be within Agile Central, but part of another CA tool set. CA Agile Central does not have a workflow tool included. I think there needs to be some simplification. The team-level side can be challenging and complicated. It could improve by being self-organizing: user stories, different hierarchies, and different perspectives. Not just as a single hierarchical structure, but something that can be multidimensional. I would like to see more Kanban support. As it stands, it doesn't seem to have the features or the layouts that the teams really need to be able to execute their tasks. It almost tries to force you into more of a Scrum style. More customization capabilities would be helpful. Providing a little bit more structure around how the system should be set up in terms of the hierarchy structure might be helpful as well. |
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
Information Not Available | It is expensive and may not be worthwhile for a small company. From a price point, it's a cost effective solution for our needs. |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs. 382,547 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 1,817 Comparisons 1,382 Reviews 1 Average Words per Review 686 Avg. Rating 5.0 | Views 10,128 Comparisons 5,613 Reviews 23 Average Words per Review 554 Avg. Rating 8.3 |
Top Comparisons | |
 Compared 40% of the time.  Compared 21% of the time.  Compared 9% of the time. | Compared 62% of the time. Compared 11% of the time. Compared 7% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| MKS | CA Agile Central, Rally Enterprise, CA Agile Training, CA Agile Coaching, CA Agile Academy, CA Agile Management , CA ALM |
Learn | |
| PTC | CA (A Broadcom Company) |
Overview | |
| The PTC Integrity Software Suite provides a comprehensive set of Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) and Systems Engineering capabilities that enable cross-discipline collaboration, improve time-to-market, streamline compliance, and reduce product risk. Simplify the complexity involved in developing today's complex engineered and smart, connected products. | With Rally Software, you can plan, prioritize, manage, track, and continuously improve your work so that you can deliver the value that your customers need with speed, quality, and efficiency. Our enterprise-class Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) SaaS platform provides visibility into progress, roadblocks, and dependencies across multiple teams, projects, and programs. This allows you to align to your strategic goals and create better business results, and to do it all in a single system of record. |
Offer | |
Learn more about PTC Integrity | Learn more about Rally Software |
Sample Customers | |
| TRW Automotive | Physicians Mutual, Harvard Pilgrim HealthCare, Editora Abril, Tata Communications, Level 3 Communications, Seagate, TomTom, Philips, Hiscox, Physicians Mutual, MYOB |
Top Industries | |
No Data Available | Financial Services Firm21% Healthcare Company16% Comms Service Provider15% Manufacturing Company10% Software R&D Company31% Manufacturing Company11% Insurance Company10% Financial Services Firm9% |
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Micro Focus, Microsoft and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: November 2019.
382,547 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See also PTC Integrity Reviews, Rally Software Reviews, and our list of Best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Companies.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post
reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference
with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign in to see all reviews and comparisons. It's free!
By clicking Sign in with LinkedIn™ you agree to let IT Central Station use your LinkedIn profile
and email address in accordance with our Privacy Policy and agree to the Terms of Service.
- Unlimited access to 31000+ reviews from real users
- Your own page to promote your professional skills
- Join a community of experts to call upon for support
Already a member? Sign in.
By registering, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
- Unlimited access to 31000+ reviews from real users
- Your own page to promote your professional skills
- Join a community of experts to call upon for support
Already a member? Sign In.