Compare PTC Integrity vs. Rally Software
PTC Integrity is ranked 9th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 5 reviews while Rally Software is ranked 6th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 5 reviews. PTC Integrity is rated 6.8, while Rally Software is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of PTC Integrity writes "Good item management and version control but does not have good performance ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rally Software writes "Built on web services which can be used to pull reports and metrics without SQL queries". PTC Integrity is most compared with JIRA, Polarion ALM and TFS, whereas Rally Software is most compared with JIRA, TFS and Microsoft Azure DevOps. See our PTC Integrity vs. Rally Software report.
Most Helpful Review | |||
Use PTC Integrity? Share your opinion. |
| ||
 Find out what your peers are saying about PTC Integrity vs. Rally Software and other solutions. Updated: March 2020. 407,845 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros | |
The most valuable feature is traceability starting from the requirements until the end of a project. The tool is quite structured and has a good command set. Complete traceability as per process requirements. We found the requirement management and the version control features to be the most useful for our client. We have been using it because it gives certain abilities in the automotive industry, such as auditing or keeping track of information. | Reporting is much easier and faster than Micro Focus ALM, with CA AC built on web services... Also, the data is more granular when it comes to tasks, iterations, sprints, and releases. I was able to create epics for our budgeting concerns and it helped me link everything together. Having that view into features and roadmap from product to delivery teams, and where they are going, then execute on. Its ability to scale. Tech support is very responsive, helpful, and available. It helps with getting the alignment between strategy and execution for the product teams, all the way down to the delivery teams. CA Agile Central provides visibility into how teams are meeting business objectives. CA Agile Central helps the entire organization run like one powerful team. |
Cons | |
We are unhappy because everything that we needed required customization and this is not a plug-and-play type of solution at all. I would like to see better integration from the architectural side. There are not enough reports. People would like to see something similar to what is available in JIRA. It's not so customizable. Compared to other tools, defining user stories is a slightly more cumbersome process as an ALM engineer. To be honest, the third controller system is kind of old. There are lots of transactional changes that have not been implemented in PTC. If you have a larger project, for example, whenever you give bits and need to change 10,000 files you can just commit them. But here the work style is a little more file based, so you'll have to take care of almost all the files individually. It's not a single commit like you do here, but rather you have to allocate time for each component or file that you want to check in or commit. That's a very big issue. | One problem I see is that if there is a dependent user story - for example, if my team is working on one thing and there is a dependent user story from another team - we can have a dependency created but we don't know if there is a change of status from the other team. That is something which is very important for Agile Central to look into so that if the other team makes any changes we will be notified as well. I think there is a missing link with the development activity. Some developers are pushing in new versions of the code, but you cannot make the link from the user story to a specific application version. A lot of the features that we would be looking to add, I am learning may not be within Agile Central, but part of another CA tool set. CA Agile Central does not have a workflow tool included. |
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
Information Not Available | It is expensive and may not be worthwhile for a small company. |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs. 407,845 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 1,992 Comparisons 1,454 Reviews 5 Average Words per Review 423 Avg. Rating 6.8 | Views 9,844 Comparisons 5,885 Reviews 5 Average Words per Review 425 Avg. Rating 8.8 |
Top Comparisons | |
 Compared 40% of the time.  Compared 18% of the time.  Compared 8% of the time. | Compared 55% of the time. Compared 12% of the time. Compared 11% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| MKS | CA Agile Central, Rally Enterprise, CA Agile Training, CA Agile Coaching, CA Agile Academy, CA Agile Management , CA ALM |
Learn | |
| PTC | Broadcom |
Overview | |
| The PTC Integrity Software Suite provides a comprehensive set of Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) and Systems Engineering capabilities that enable cross-discipline collaboration, improve time-to-market, streamline compliance, and reduce product risk. Simplify the complexity involved in developing today's complex engineered and smart, connected products. | With Rally Software, you can plan, prioritize, manage, track, and continuously improve your work so that you can deliver the value that your customers need with speed, quality, and efficiency. Our enterprise-class Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) SaaS platform provides visibility into progress, roadblocks, and dependencies across multiple teams, projects, and programs. This allows you to align to your strategic goals and create better business results, and to do it all in a single system of record. |
Offer | |
Learn more about PTC Integrity | Learn more about Rally Software |
Sample Customers | |
| TRW Automotive | Physicians Mutual, Harvard Pilgrim HealthCare, Editora Abril, Tata Communications, Level 3 Communications, Seagate, TomTom, Philips, Hiscox, Physicians Mutual, MYOB |
Top Industries | |
Transportation Company50% Manufacturing Company25% Engineering Company13% Aerospace/Defense Firm13% Software R&D Company37% Transportation Company23% Manufacturing Company16% Comms Service Provider8% | Financial Services Firm21% Healthcare Company16% Comms Service Provider15% Manufacturing Company10% Software R&D Company39% Manufacturing Company8% Insurance Company8% Comms Service Provider8% |
Find out what your peers are saying about PTC Integrity vs. Rally Software and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
407,845 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See also PTC Integrity Reviews, Rally Software Reviews, and our list of Best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Companies.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post
reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference
with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.