QuickBase vs SugarCRM Platform comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quickbase Logo
2,924 views|1,425 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
SugarCRM Logo
118 views|65 comparisons
46% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between QuickBase and SugarCRM Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Rapid Application Development Software Report (Updated: April 2024).
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"There's a lot of stability in QuickBase...I really appreciate the processing part of QuickBase, especially considering how we're able to get information in real time instead of having to wait.""This solution has provided for Rapid deployment of data collection tools, replacing spreadsheets with near real-time data.""Considering factors like functionality and price, the product proves to be worth the investment.""The need for little to no code knowledge has been huge.""Creating applications in Quickbase will take, literally, a fraction of the time it would take to create them in other database applications (which shall remain unnamed).""Allows users have anytime/anywhere access.""It has helped streamline and simply track status and collection of data from suppliers and other internal departments.""QuickBase reminds me when a software license or a hardware support contract is near expiration so that I can initiate our company's procurement process in time and not miss a deadline."

More QuickBase Pros →

"It works well with Jira. You can customize it to fit your needs.""The most valuable features of the SugarCRM platform include its flexibility in customizing fields, layouts, and dashboards.""The most valuable feature is relation capability, which allows us to relay customers with invoice orders.""The most valuable features of Sugar Enterprise are the exports of graphics, statuses, complaints, and tasks.""The most valuable aspect of this solution is its low cost."

More SugarCRM Platform Pros →

Cons
"There is room for improvement in terms of user-friendliness.""I would like to see the reporting enhanced because some of them are not easy to generate.""I would like the product to add more working processes.""The dashboard is not organized.""It would be beneficial for the QuickBase team to focus on improving the integration of cloud-based storage platforms within their product. In use cases like ours, where QuickBase serves as a centralized source of truth for construction projects, having seamless integration with platforms like Dropbox or OneDrive would greatly enhance the product's capabilities.""They could enhance the ability to link records between tables directly without the need for additional automation to increase space and time.""Third-party integration -- they are working on it and I find their brand-new still-in-beta Webhooks very promising.""Access to more standard default layouts and sample builds would be useful, and access to more training on use and flexibility."

More QuickBase Cons →

"While it is already user-friendly, a slight enhancement in UI design, especially in terms of color combinations, could make the platform more visually appealing and comfortable to use.""In the next release, I would like to see personalization of information about customers or specific businesses or opportunities.""You cannot include all your entities under one instance at the moment.""It lacks customization, and this is the main reason that we are switching to a different solution.""I would like to see more integration on a mobile platform in the next release.""Sugar Enterprise could improve by removing bugs and glitches. For example, a comment was made but in the comment section, it was never displayed. However, the problems we faced might not be the fault of the solution."

More SugarCRM Platform Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing for QuickBase is pretty straightforward, It is based on a per user/per month licensing fee."
  • "We felt the pricing and licensing for QuickBase were easy enough to understand, fair and competitive."
  • "Quickbase is probably not the cheapest app out there. That said, it is worth its weight in gold. There is no other app that I know of in the market today that can do what Quickbase does."
  • "You have to negotiate the price because it varies based on the number of users you have, as well as how much cloud storage space you need."
  • "It is probably about 300 per license per person. There is just the licensing cost. There are no additional costs."
  • "The product is cheap when compared to other products."
  • "The pricing for the tier my company used included ten seats and the subcontractor, amounting to approximately $18,000 USD per year."
  • "The solution is expensive and geared toward enterprise-level clients."
  • More QuickBase Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."
  • More SugarCRM Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Considering factors like functionality and price, the product proves to be worth the investment.
    Top Answer:The pricing for the tier my company used included ten seats and the subcontractor, amounting to approximately $18,000 USD per year. As for data volume, there is a different pricing model once you… more »
    Top Answer:Areas for improvement in QuickBase include incorporating certain formulas like VLOOKUP, commonly used in platforms like Excel. Additionally, they could enhance the ability to link records between… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable features of the SugarCRM platform include its flexibility in customizing fields, layouts, and dashboards.
    Top Answer:I would rate the costliness of SugarCRM a two out of ten. It is very affordable. When compared to competitors like Zoho and Salesforce, it is considered quite budget-friendly. The additional costs for… more »
    Top Answer:One area where SugarCRM could improve is its UI. While it is already user-friendly, a slight enhancement in UI design, especially in terms of color combinations, could make the platform more visually… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    2,924
    Comparisons
    1,425
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    559
    Rating
    8.4
    Views
    118
    Comparisons
    65
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    567
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Quick Base, TSheets
    Learn More
    Overview

    Trusted by more than half of the Fortune 100, QuickBase is a low-code platform for building, customizing, and integrating custom business applications. With more than 6,000 customers and 500,000 active users, QuickBase is the technology of choice for organizations that want to empower business users to solve their own challenges while maintaining the governance and security of an enterprise-quality app development system.

    SugarCRM is a versatile CRM solution that facilitates communication and organization within a company. Its primary use case includes call and comment logging, account relation, customer detail storage, verification handling, transaction tracking, marketing material management, and payment transaction handling. The most valuable functionalities include customizable exports of graphics, statuses, complaints, and tasks, as well as its scalability, stability, and low cost. It integrates well with Jira and can be easily configured. The platform improves efficiency, productivity, collaboration, communication, and coordination within organizations, while also providing valuable insights and data analytics for informed decision-making.

    Sample Customers
    Procter & Gamble, Tesla, Norwegian Cruise Line, Google, Metso, Agero, Kayak, PTC, Patra Corp, TomTom, Southwest Airlines, FedEx Office
    Redglaze Group, TengoInternet, Hilco, Bancvue, Vet Adivsor
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Construction Company18%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Logistics Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization69%
    Computer Software Company4%
    Insurance Company3%
    Manufacturing Company3%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization40%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Real Estate/Law Firm7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business51%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise30%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business7%
    Midsize Enterprise71%
    Large Enterprise22%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business69%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise15%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise49%
    Large Enterprise31%
    Buyer's Guide
    Rapid Application Development Software
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software. Updated: April 2024.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    QuickBase is ranked 16th in Rapid Application Development Software with 73 reviews while SugarCRM Platform is ranked 8th in CRM Customer Engagement Centers with 11 reviews. QuickBase is rated 9.0, while SugarCRM Platform is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of QuickBase writes "Reliable, user-driven platform, that is scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SugarCRM Platform writes "User-friendly and allows for creating your own modules". QuickBase is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Sales Creatio, Oracle Fusion Service, OutSystems and ServiceNow, whereas SugarCRM Platform is most compared with Salesforce Sales Cloud.

    We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.