Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS vs VMware RabbitMQ comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Red Hat Logo
122 views|105 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
VMware Logo
6,393 views|5,554 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS and VMware RabbitMQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, IBM, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Message Queue (MQ) Software Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"JBoss is easy to use, and we have a good partner here in Tunisia to provide local support."

More Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS Pros →

"Simple and straightforward admin portals: Made it easy for users and worked out excellently for our requirements""It is easy to use. The addition of more queues and more services can be managed very easily.""We use VMware RabbitMQ to transfer information from one point to another.""The message routing is the most valuable feature. It is effective and flexible.""The solution has really cool features to use. Its management console is excellent. You can utilize plugins to view the performance of the whole service on one network.""The product's feature of data transaction works fast.""RabbitMQ will help to remove a lot of the complexities and create a loosely coupled codebase.""We have been able to set up a messaging system that facilitates data integration between the software modules that we sell."

More VMware RabbitMQ Pros →

Cons
"JBoss could add more automation."

More Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS Cons →

"Their implementation is quite tricky. It's not that easy to implement RabbitMQ as a cluster.""The user interface could be improved.""VMware RabbitMQ needs to create a new queue system.""VMware RabbitMQ's configuration process could be easier to understand.""I would like to see the performance of the administration portal improved and additional messaging protocols.""The next release should include some of the flexibility and features that Kafka offers.""The product is pretty hard to configure.""The availability could be better."

More VMware RabbitMQ Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The pricing is okay."
  • "This is an open source solution."
  • "are using the open-source version, which can be used free of cost."
  • "The pricing for RabbitMQ is reasonable. It is worth the cost."
  • "The solution's pricing is cost-effective as it does not involve significant expenses. Licensing is required only for the server, while clients do not need any licensing. Therefore, it proves to be a cost-efficient option."
  • "It is an open-source platform. Although, we have to pay for additional features."
  • "It is an open-source product."
  • More VMware RabbitMQ Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:JBoss is easy to use, and we have a good partner here in Tunisia to provide local support.
    Top Answer:JBoss could add more automation.
    Top Answer:We have an application-presentation layer, and we use JBoss to communicate with the application layer. The interceptors use Active MQ.
    Top Answer:IBM MQ has a great reputation behind it, and this solution is very robust with great stability. It is easy to use, simple to configure and integrates well with our enterprise ecosystem and protocols… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature is asynchronous calls, which are easy to configure.
    Ranking
    Views
    122
    Comparisons
    105
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    172
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    6,393
    Comparisons
    5,554
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    369
    Rating
    8.6
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    RabbitMQ by Pivotal, Rabbit, RabbitMQ
    Learn More
    Overview

    To respond to business demands quickly and efficiently, you need a way to integrate the applications and data spread across your enterprise. Red Hat JBoss A-MQ—based on the Apache ActiveMQ open source project—is a flexible, high-performance messaging platform that delivers information reliably, enabling real-time integration and connecting the Internet of Things (IoT).

    Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS extends the capabilities to our Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) solution, Red Hat OpenShift, for messaging services in the cloud.

    RabbitMQ is the most popular open source message broker, with more than 35,000 production deployments world-wide. RabbitMQ is lightweight and easy to deploy on premises and in the cloud and runs on all major operating systems. It supports most developer platforms, multiple messaging protocols and can be deployed in distributed and federated configurations to meet high-scale, high-availability requirements.

    Sample Customers
    E*TRADE, CERN, CenturyLink, AECOM, Sabre Holdings
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Retailer17%
    University11%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm27%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise46%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    Message Queue (MQ) Software
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, IBM, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS is ranked 12th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 1 review while VMware RabbitMQ is ranked 5th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 39 reviews. Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS is rated 8.0, while VMware RabbitMQ is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS writes "It's scalable and easy to use, and we have local support here in Tunisia". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware RabbitMQ writes "A cloud solution for asynchronous call with easy configuration". Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS is most compared with IBM MQ and Apache Kafka, whereas VMware RabbitMQ is most compared with IBM MQ, ActiveMQ, Apache Kafka, Anypoint MQ and Red Hat AMQ.

    See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

    We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.