Anonymous UserDirector Of Information Technology at a government
Antonio ScolaOwner & Entrepreneur at SUNLIT TECHNOLOGIES
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The most valuable feature for us is the different types of reporting it provides."
"We feel the interface is very good. It is very easy to use, even a nontechnical person can use it."
"The most valuable feature is the site scanning, where we can provide a complete subnet and what it is we need to scan on those devices."
"There are many integrations with things like the VMware NSX that are great, the reporting is really solid."
"It's easy to use. It's fast, it's a powerful easy to access tool."
"This solution is very easy to use and easy to install."
"The most important aspect of the solution is that it rarely gives false positives, especially compared to other products. It provides very clear reports for our IT teams to look at."
"The main functionality of identifying item endpoints that weren't properly patched or had vulnerabilities is the solution's most valuable feature."
"Technical support has been good. They respond quite quickly."
"The most valuable feature for me is container scanning because I am interested in CICD security."
"The solution can integrate with third parties and meets standard compliance."
"The vulnerability scanning is the most important aspect of the solution for us."
"The initial setup is very straightforward."
"They are on a good trajectory as a company and investing in R&D in the right ways."
"It is very stable, and it is updated periodically by adding new vulnerabilities."
"This solution integrates with another module in Metasploit, that doesn't exist in the other solutions. It is subscribed to on our roadmap, but we chose to implement both Nexppose and AppSpider."
"The reporting has room for improvement. You cannot customize any report. If I need a specific requirement, I have to create a new report for it."
"The reporting is a little bit tricky because it can be difficult to exactly pinpoint some of the assets to filter them and generate a report."
"Some difficulties with the online reporting and lack of integrations."
"The InsightVM cannot scan if we connect to our customer by the VPN."
"It would be nice to have an additional feature that would provide reports on who has logged onto the console or who did what on the console."
"There needs to be much clearer instructions surrounding scanning."
"We found that after you passed an endpoint, it didn't always reflect it in the next scan. I'm not sure if it was a glitch or some issue with the product's software. That was never clear. That was always an issue and something that definitely needed improvement."
"The interface could be improved; right now it's running on two interfaces simultaneously."
"It would be helpful if Tenable could be more clear with regard to everything the solution can and cannot do with the particular license that you have."
"An area of improvement for this solution is being able to customize the dashboard. For example, the dashboard does not allow us to view a previous months vulnerability results alongside current results to make comparisons."
"The pricing of the solution could be more reasonable."
"There needs to be better dashboard navigation."
"The solution seems to focus too much on enterprises, and they really need a product that works for SMBs."
"It can have more integration."
"This solution is expensive, but it's fine for us as we have an open budget for security solutions. Protection and having the system secured is more important."
"The license is IP based. How many IPs you are using to scan is the amount of the license you have to buy. The number of users doesn't matter; many users can use it or only person. It depends on the culture of the organization."
"Our licensing costs are somewhere around $40,000 annually. There are no additional fees."
"The licensing is asset-based and very straightforward."
"Its price is too high. My only concern or issue with Rapid7 is its pricing."
"Comparing the price with the value that we receive, I am not happy with it."
"The license is annual and this is the optimal approach when it comes to most software."
"In some cases, we procure the licenses. In some cases, the customers directly buy the license from Rapid7."
"There are additional features that can be licensed for an additional cost."
"The solution is not too expensive."
Rapid7 InsightVM is the vulnerability assessment tool built for the modern web. InsightVM combines complete ecosystem visibility, an unparalleled understanding of the attacker mindset, and the agility of SecOps so you can act before impact.
Tenable.io Vulnerability Management provides the most accurate information about all your assets and vulnerabilities in ever-changing environments. Available for cloud or on-prem deployment, Tenable.io features a streamlined interface, intuitive guidance, and seamless integrations that help security teams maximize efficiency. When visibility and insight matter most, Tenable.io helps you truly understand your Cyber Exposure.
Rapid7 InsightVM is ranked 2nd in Vulnerability Management with 15 reviews while Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is ranked 7th in Vulnerability Management with 7 reviews. Rapid7 InsightVM is rated 8.0, while Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Rapid7 InsightVM writes "Broad capabilities make this scanning solution able to cover a lot of ground". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable.io Vulnerability Management writes "Very mature and quite stable but could use a better user interface". Rapid7 InsightVM is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable SC, Qualys VM, Rapid7 Metasploit and Microsoft Intune, whereas Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is most compared with Tenable SC, Tenable Nessus, Snyk, Orca Security and Arctic Wolf Managed Risk. See our Rapid7 InsightVM vs. Tenable.io Vulnerability Management report.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.