Compare RSA Archer vs. RiskRecon

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
RiskRecon Logo
1,538 views|1,290 comparisons
RSA Archer Logo
5,803 views|4,080 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Vendor Risk Management solutions are best for your needs.
524,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The part I liked about Archer was the risk assessment for deficiencies and being able to use it there.
Top Answer: The problem is, and I've had years and years of experience using it, let's say decades of experience with it, and they keep changing it. It could be as much as two years or so and they change the… more »
Top Answer: For Archer, today there is everything from risk management to looking at security and how to track all the security defects. We don't have Archer connected to ServiceNow. We had the better version… more »
Average Words per Review
Average Words per Review
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Learn More

RiskRecon provides a SaaS platform that helps organizations more effectively manage the risk reality of increasingly interconnected IT ecosystems by delivering frequent, comprehensive and actionable security performance measurements.

Using proprietary data gathering techniques, RiskRecon creates a 360-degree risk profile of an enterprise's public IT footprint. Based on that footprint and a detailed analysis, a RiskRecon rating and report is generated providing detailed, actionable information with context. No additional analysis is required.

Clients rely on RiskRecon to bring greater transparency, accountability and productivity to their vulnerability and third-party risk management processes. And, they trust that RiskRecon's continuous monitoring solution employs only ethical techniques - no proprietary vendor data, no permissions and no invasive scans.

Archer adapt enterprise governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) products to your requirements, build applications, and integrate with other systems, control the audit lifecycle to enable improved governance of audit-related activities, data, and processes, reduce the risk of IT and business disruption, harmful operational events, and significant business crises and build an efficient, collaborative governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) program across IT, finance, operations, and legal.
Learn more about RiskRecon
Learn more about RSA Archer
Sample Customers
Informatica, Arrow, Tufts Health Plan, Sentara, Nacco Industries
T-Systems, Bridge Point, Equifax, First Data, Global Imaging Company, Manulife Financial
Top Industries
Computer Software Company25%
Financial Services Firm15%
Comms Service Provider11%
Insurance Company8%
Computer Software Company29%
Financial Services Firm12%
Comms Service Provider9%
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA Archer vs. RiskRecon and other solutions. Updated: July 2021.
524,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.

RiskRecon is ranked 7th in IT Vendor Risk Management while RSA Archer is ranked 1st in IT Vendor Risk Management with 4 reviews. RiskRecon is rated 0.0, while RSA Archer is rated 8.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Archer writes "A rich feature set helps save time and effort, making us more efficient and saving us money". RiskRecon is most compared with BitSight, SecurityScorecard, UpGuard and OneTrust GRC, whereas RSA Archer is most compared with IBM OpenPages, OneTrust GRC, Telos Xacta IA Manager, MetricStream and Galvanize HighBond.

See our list of best IT Vendor Risk Management vendors.

We monitor all IT Vendor Risk Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.