Selenium HQ vs. Silk Test

As of March 2019, Selenium HQ is ranked 5th in Functional Testing Tools with 11 reviews vs Silk Test which is ranked 15th in Functional Testing Tools with 1 review. The top reviewer of Selenium HQ writes "Provides Freedom To Choose The Tools Needed For Full-Fledged Automation Framework". The top reviewer of Silk Test writes "OCR recognition and integration with IE are advantages but needs better integration with other tools". Selenium HQ is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Katalon Studio and UFT Pro (LeanFT). Silk Test is most compared with UFT (QTP), LoadRunner and Selenium HQ.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Selenium HQ Logo
26,075 views|14,763 comparisons
Silk Test Logo
8,843 views|3,481 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: February 2019.
325,421 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
This product is open source and free. That was a huge deciding factor for us getting into it.It is free.Since it is an open source. It is free to use. However my company see it as the future of load testing.It's open-source, so there's no need to pay for a license.There is no pricing cost. License is Apache License 2.0.It is free to use.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
325,421 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
5th
Views
26,075
Comparisons
14,763
Reviews
11
Followers
1,023
Avg. Rating
8.6
15th
Views
8,843
Comparisons
3,481
Reviews
1
Followers
259
Avg. Rating
7.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Also Known As
SeleniumHQSegue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test, Silk Performer
Learn
SeleniumHQ
Video Not Available
Micro Focus
Overview

Selenium HQ is a suite of tools to automate web browsers across many platforms. Selenium runs in many browsers and operating systems and can be controlled by many programming languages and testing frameworks. Selenium consist of two types:

  1. Selenium WebDriver - create robust, browser-based regression automation suites & tests and scale & distribute scripts across many environments.
  2. Selenium IDE - create quick bug reproduction scripts and create scripts to aid in automation-aided exploratory testing.
SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.
Offer
Learn more about Selenium HQ
Learn more about Silk Test
Sample Customers
BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, experitest, Tricentis GmbH, SmartBear SoftwareKrung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, MÂȘller, AVG Technologies
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Retailer20%
Software R&D Company13%
Comms Service Provider13%
Manufacturing Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm39%
Government12%
Comms Service Provider11%
Manufacturing Company7%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: February 2019.
325,421 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email