Selenium HQ vs. Silk Test

Selenium HQ is ranked 5th in Functional Testing Tools with 12 reviews vs Silk Test which is ranked 16th in Functional Testing Tools with 2 reviews. The top reviewer of Selenium HQ writes "Provides Freedom To Choose The Tools Needed For Full-Fledged Automation Framework". The top reviewer of Silk Test writes "OCR recognition and integration with IE are advantages but needs better integration with other tools". Selenium HQ is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, UFT Pro (LeanFT) and SmartBear TestComplete. Silk Test is most compared with UFT (QTP), LoadRunner and Selenium HQ.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Null Product? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools.
300,656 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing Selenium HQ vs. Silk Test

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
This product is open source and free. That was a huge deciding factor for us getting into it.It is free.Since it is an open source. It is free to use. However my company see it as the future of load testing.It's open-source, so there's no need to pay for a license.There is no pricing cost. License is Apache License 2.0.It is free to use.

Read more »

Information Not Available
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
300,656 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
23,333
Comparisons
14,383
Reviews
13
Followers
965
Avg. Rating
8.5
Views
8,050
Comparisons
3,515
Reviews
2
Followers
319
Avg. Rating
7.0
Views
0
Comparisons
0
Reviews
1
Followers
1
Avg. Rating
5.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
See more Selenium HQ competitors »
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
See more Silk Test competitors »
Also Known As
SeleniumHQSegue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test, Silk Performer
Website/Video
SeleniumHQ
Micro Focus
Null Vendor
Overview

Selenium HQ is a suite of tools to automate web browsers across many platforms. Selenium runs in many browsers and operating systems and can be controlled by many programming languages and testing frameworks. Selenium consist of two types:

  1. Selenium WebDriver - create robust, browser-based regression automation suites & tests and scale & distribute scripts across many environments.
  2. Selenium IDE - create quick bug reproduction scripts and create scripts to aid in automation-aided exploratory testing.
SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.
Information Not Available
OFFER
Learn more about Selenium HQ
Learn more about Silk Test
Learn more about Null Product
Sample Customers
BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, experitest, Tricentis GmbH, SmartBear SoftwareKrung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, MÂȘller, AVG Technologies
Information Not Available
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Retailer
20%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Software R&D Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
24%
Comms Service Provider
17%
Software R&D Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Insurance Company
24%
Healthcare Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Software R&D Company
11%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
24%
Midsize Enterprise
33%
Large Enterprise
43%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
13%
Midsize Enterprise
33%
Large Enterprise
54%
REVIEWERS
Small Business
13%
Midsize Enterprise
38%
Large Enterprise
50%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools.
Download now
300,656 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email