Selenium HQ vs. Silk Test

Selenium HQ is ranked 5th in Functional Testing Tools with 11 reviews vs Silk Test which is ranked 14th in Functional Testing Tools with 2 reviews. The top reviewer of Selenium HQ writes "Provides Freedom To Choose The Tools Needed For Full-Fledged Automation Framework". The top reviewer of Silk Test writes "OCR recognition and integration with IE are advantages but needs better integration with other tools". Selenium HQ is most compared with Katalon Studio, Tricentis Tosca and UFT Pro (LeanFT). Silk Test is most compared with UFT (QTP), LoadRunner and Selenium HQ.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Selenium HQ Logo
24,514 views|14,507 comparisons
Silk Test Logo
8,414 views|3,409 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools.
309,677 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
This product is open source and free. That was a huge deciding factor for us getting into it.It is free.Since it is an open source. It is free to use. However my company see it as the future of load testing.It's open-source, so there's no need to pay for a license.There is no pricing cost. License is Apache License 2.0.It is free to use.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
309,677 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
5th
Views
24,514
Comparisons
14,507
Reviews
11
Followers
959
Avg. Rating
8.6
14th
Views
8,414
Comparisons
3,409
Reviews
2
Followers
281
Avg. Rating
7.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Also Known As
SeleniumHQSegue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test, Silk Performer
Learn
SeleniumHQ
Video Not Available
Micro Focus
Overview

Selenium HQ is a suite of tools to automate web browsers across many platforms. Selenium runs in many browsers and operating systems and can be controlled by many programming languages and testing frameworks. Selenium consist of two types:

  1. Selenium WebDriver - create robust, browser-based regression automation suites & tests and scale & distribute scripts across many environments.
  2. Selenium IDE - create quick bug reproduction scripts and create scripts to aid in automation-aided exploratory testing.
SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.
Offer
Learn more about Selenium HQ
Learn more about Silk Test
Sample Customers
BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, experitest, Tricentis GmbH, SmartBear SoftwareKrung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, MÂȘller, AVG Technologies
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Retailer20%
Software R&D Company13%
Comms Service Provider13%
Manufacturing Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm24%
Comms Service Provider17%
Software R&D Company14%
Manufacturing Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Insurance Company24%
Healthcare Company13%
Comms Service Provider13%
Software R&D Company11%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business24%
Midsize Enterprise33%
Large Enterprise43%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise33%
Large Enterprise54%
REVIEWERS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise38%
Large Enterprise50%
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus, Tricentis, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools.
309,677 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email