We performed a comparison between ReadyAPI Test and Selenium HQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."One good feature is SoapUI's URL check, which allows you to check among the applications. I'm not just talking about the ones for Android. It has all kinds of multi-world tests that are really helpful."
"The Pro and free version of SoapUI Pro has good technical support."
"The solution scales well."
"SoapUI Pro is a good tool when it comes to API design and orchestration. Additionally, it is beneficial for functional and for performance testing."
"It's a very simple solution to use."
"The interface is user-friendly."
"The solution has some good scanning features."
"The solution offers excellent integration capabilities."
"My customer previously validated every file and it would take almost 15-20 minutes for a document. They used to randomly select and test only 100 out of the thousands, maybe 85,000, files, to pick up sampling. Each file would take around 20 to 25 minutes, so we were not able to do it manually, but with the help of Selenium, we were able to test all the files in two days. It saves a lot of time."
"The most valuable aspect of Selenium is that it gives you the flexibility to customize or write your own code, your own features, etc. It's not restricted by licensing."
"It is a good automation tool."
"All the features in Selenium to automate the UI."
"The ability to present your tests on a wiki page and hooking them up to the scripts/fixtures."
"The most valuable features of this solution are its flexibility, being open source, and it has close to no limits when it comes to integrating with any language, or browser you are using."
"Some of the most valuable features of this solution are open-source, they have good support, good community support, and it supports multiple languages whether you use C-Sharp or not. These are some of the most important benefits."
"The testing solution produces the best web applications."
"Automation features are not user-friendly."
"If the load and bare minimum could be defined, I would give this solution a higher rating."
"The UI should be improved."
"SoapUI Pro could improve by having dashboards."
"Stability has been an issue for us. It needs to be looked at and made a bit better."
"SoapUI would benefit from some more customization abilities. It's a good interface, but it would be nice if they added the ability to build custom dashboards where the user can do their own bar graphs and pie charts."
"The current interface is unsatisfactory."
"I find that I'm fighting with the opportunities to order requests."
"The solution can be improved by providing better reporting logs."
"Selenium uses a layer-based approach that is somewhat slower than Eggplant when it comes to executing code."
"It would be awesome if there was a standalone implementation of Selenium for non-developer users."
"The installation could be simplified, it is a bit difficult to install."
"It is not easy to make IE plus Selenium work good as other browsers. Firefox and Chrome are the best ones to work with Selenium."
"I would like to see Selenium HQ support legacy platforms."
"I would like to see automatic logs generated."
"For email-based applications, we can't automate as we would like to, making it necessary to bring in a third-party product to do so."
ReadyAPI Test is ranked 15th in Functional Testing Tools with 31 reviews while Selenium HQ is ranked 4th in Functional Testing Tools with 102 reviews. ReadyAPI Test is rated 8.0, while Selenium HQ is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ReadyAPI Test writes "Has out-of-the-box database support and can be easily used by non-technical staff ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Selenium HQ writes "Continuously being developed and large community makes it easy to find solutions". ReadyAPI Test is most compared with Postman, ReadyAPI, Broadcom Service Virtualization, Tricentis Tosca and OpenText UFT One, whereas Selenium HQ is most compared with Eggplant Test, Tricentis Tosca, Worksoft Certify, Telerik Test Studio and OpenText Silk Test. See our ReadyAPI Test vs. Selenium HQ report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.