We performed a comparison between SpecFlow and TestRail based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Test Management Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of the solution is unit testing...It is also an easy-to-use and user-friendly product that can easily adapt to any framework."
"The initial setup is easy."
"SpecFlow's best feature is the ability to add additional layers to the programming."
"One of the most valuable features of SpecFlow for us is its risk identification capabilities."
"I use the solution for test management."
"I haven't faced any stability issues using the solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"This is a user friendly solution."
"From a testing perspective, the management is awesome. I am able to do testing and then add the reporting and the evidence. It is fair in terms of the price that you're paying. You get what you're paying for."
"You don't need to follow complex procedures to create a test run, test case, etc."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is the dashboard."
"Most valuable features are the ease of organizing test cases and a great API for sending results from automated test run results into the database."
"Reliable and stable. It is important that TestRail be up and running 24/7 as we have users around the world using it."
"Regarding improvement, it would be good if SpecFlow could provide chain testing, which it currently doesn't allow."
"SpecFlow would be improved with the addition of functionality reporting, which would be really helpful for automation testing."
"I'd prefer in TFS if we could be writing test cases, not in the old classical version. We should be writing in Gherkin and then automatically have it convert that Gherkin test case into SpecFlow feature files."
"SpecFlow's installation and configuration can be a bit challenging due to its flexibility as an open-source tool."
"There are a number of improvements that have been requested. While I don't have a list of these requests available, many can be found on Gurock's forum."
"It would be nice to have a description section when creating the test scenario itself so I can indicate what the configuration should be."
"I've encountered at some point, some difficulties on the administration side, but I don't remember exactly what they were."
"The product is not focused on synthetic data creation. I would also like to see more integrations with other platforms."
"TestRail should improve its pricing."
"TestRail's user interface is not great. When you use it for the first time, you will be very uncomfortable and not know how to create test cases. It doesn't have a field for preconditions and post-conditions."
"The reports should be more user-friendly."
"The test suite management has room for improvement as well as better reporting."
SpecFlow is ranked 9th in Test Management Tools with 4 reviews while TestRail is ranked 3rd in Test Management Tools with 21 reviews. SpecFlow is rated 7.2, while TestRail is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of SpecFlow writes "Ensures efficient testing and validation of both business and technical requirements". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TestRail writes "A tool that provides effective test management and real-time reporting capabilities". SpecFlow is most compared with Tricentis Tosca and Tricentis qTest, whereas TestRail is most compared with Zephyr Enterprise, Tricentis qTest, TFS, Tricentis Tosca and Helix ALM. See our SpecFlow vs. TestRail report.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
