We performed a comparison between Symantec Endpoint Security and Trend Micro ServerProtect based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Fortinet is very user-friendly for customers."
"The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"he solution is an anti-malware product that integrates well with other vendor products such as firewalls, SIEM, etc. It captures threat intelligence and gives you better visibility. The product also has sandboxing features."
"It is very easy to set up. I would rate my experience with the initial setup a ten out of ten, with ten being very easy to set up."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's scalability is quite good, and you can add licenses to the solution."
"This is stable and scalable."
"The features that I have found most valuable are the ability to customize it and to reduce its size. It lets you run in a very small window in terms of memory and resources on legacy cash registers."
"It's good at detecting signature-based stuff and stopping that."
"The solution offers very good security features and is comparable to Sophos."
"It's customizable, we're able to tune it to work with our products."
"Symantec Endpoint Security is easy to use, fast, and good for small and medium-sized businesses."
"I find it is the most reliable solution on the market."
"The technical support is very good. They have an Indian support team, so there are no delays in receiving support."
"Symantec ATP provides quite a good overview of how threats have spread within the company."
"I have found the central control console the most valuable feature."
"It can be managed from the cloud."
"Allows us to protect OneDrive and SharePoint, and emails too."
"The initial setup is very straightforward."
"I use this solution for data blocking, software protection, and frame protection."
"Able to quarantine any malware."
"Virtual Batching and the intelligent anti-malware components are valuable security tools."
"The most valuable feature is Data Loss Prevention (DLP)."
"Scalable security solution with virtualization and virtual patching functions, able to provide full security that's specific to the service, e.g. it handles virtual machines better."
"Making the portal mobile friendly would be helpful when I am out of office."
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"The dashboard isn't easy to access and manage."
"FortiEDR can be improved by providing more detailed reporting."
"ZTNA can improve latency."
"To improve Fortinet, we need to see more features and technology areas at the endpoint level introduced."
"The solution's installation from a central installation server could be improved because the engineers had a little bit of trouble getting it installed from a central location."
"The security should be strong for the cloud. Some applications are on-prem and some are on the cloud. Fortinet should also have strong security for the cloud. There should be more security for the cloud."
"The technical support could improve because when you reach level one support there is a lot of delays."
"The management of the server is a bit complex."
"There is room for improvement in the zero-day threat detection system."
"After selling this product, what we have observed is that the system gets slower, which is a major issue."
"The solution could improve by having a better graphical interface."
"There was an administrative feature, which was available in the previous version, which has been removed. We would like that feature to be added again."
"Installation of the tool on a workstation requires some technical knowledge, which could be more straightforward."
"Maybe Symantec Endpoint Security could amend their pricing structure, but they always offer a good product."
"Integration with different platforms could be an area for improvement in Trend Micro ServerProtect, e.g. it needs more integration. It could also be more secure and more stable. In the next release, this solution should also include more EDR visibility."
"No built-in vulnerability scanner for management solutions."
"The cost is very high and it should be lower to be more competitive."
"We found that when we push Trend Micro from the console to our client's PCs, we need to manually restart the PC. I have 500 users and the manual input is time-consuming."
"I would like to see SMS notifications sent as alerts, in case we do not have access to our email."
"Lacking analytics and a machine learning technique."
"Notifications are not very good with Trend Micro."
"The endpoint protection could always be stronger."
Symantec Endpoint Security is ranked 5th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 139 reviews while Trend Micro ServerProtect is ranked 48th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 13 reviews. Symantec Endpoint Security is rated 7.6, while Trend Micro ServerProtect is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Symantec Endpoint Security writes "The solution has given us visibility into compliance within our whole system and helped us ensure everything is updated". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro ServerProtect writes "Ensures comprehensive protection, monitoring capabilities, and real-time insightful information". Symantec Endpoint Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Trend Micro Deep Security, whereas Trend Micro ServerProtect is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum and Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security. See our Symantec Endpoint Security vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.