We performed a comparison between Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows [EOL] and Veritas NetBackup based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Backup and Recovery."User-friendly data backup and protection solution for a Windows environment. The Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows is very scalable, stable, and has good compatibility and integration."
"Solution provides good security."
"The most valuable feature is that it's a VMware environment."
"The initial setup was straightforward. It was very easy. Deployment only took about one hour with configuration and everything considered."
"Veeam is very useful for the Hyper-V environment."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of use."
"The installation of Veeam Agent is straightforward."
"The solution is meeting all of our client's requirements. It has good performance."
"What I like most is it is a professional product. It supports all kinds of technologies, and I consider it one of the best backup products available."
"DLO: Client for laptops."
"Logs are very easy to read, parse, and use for diagnostics."
"It's a good product, it does what we want it to do."
"It's durable — we achieve what we expect from it."
"The deduplication feature is useful. Deduplication and compression features are what I like about NetBackup."
"Veritas NetBackup is a scalable solution."
"I like NetBackup's anomaly detection and Linux storage features."
"The support could be improved a lot, as it is currently non-existent."
"Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows should improve by having more features, easier deployment, and compatibility with Unix boxes."
"The stability of this solution needs to be improved."
"There isn't really anything I would like to improve. Maybe the solution could be more secure."
"Troubleshooting is very hard."
"We need some sort of security for backups and archives."
"While the Veeam agent is perfect, sometimes the agent doesn't install in Windows."
"The backups can go slow."
"The solution costs too much."
"The solution could improve by having a feature to backup iSeries workloads."
"It would be helpful, in future releases, if the solution could add WORM (Write Once Read Many) support right within the product."
"In the next release, I would like to have a better way to protect against ransomware attacks and a better way of logging issues where you don't have to enable the verbose logging to capture the problems."
"This solution would benefit from a more friendly, web-based interface."
"I also think they could improve the reporting. They use a web-based software application OpsCenter for the reporting and I see that they haven't made any changes in years."
"Veritas could simplify the firmware recovery in terms of the deployed. The process shouldn't be dependent on the agents. It should be completely agentless."
"We would like the Java console to be updated."
More Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Backup and Recovery with 40 reviews while Veritas NetBackup is ranked 5th in Backup and Recovery with 110 reviews. Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows [EOL] is rated 8.4, while Veritas NetBackup is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows [EOL] writes "Functional application availability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veritas NetBackup writes "Efficient data recovery and replication features ". Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows [EOL] is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, AOMEI Cyber Backup, Acronis Cyber Protect, Rubrik and AWS Backup, whereas Veritas NetBackup is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Rubrik, Azure Backup, Veritas NetBackup Appliance and Veritas Backup Exec.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.