Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection Room for Improvement
The solution needs to offer more integration with other programs, like the Cisco API. Many customers require some features from Cisco API. I don't have enough documentation yet regarding the integration with Infoblox and Cisco so I don't know enough about how to integrate the two. There needs to be more readily available documentation. There needs to be more capabilities in order to configure the console itself instead of the user interface dashboard. Configuring the DNS or DHCP through the console instead of the GUI dashboard would be better. Right now, there's a limitation on the CLI. In some cases, sometimes I need to use the console instead of the user interface. This isn't possible yet, however, I am hopeful it is part of their roadmap going forward. View full review »
Occasionally the CPU goes up. However, this is normal for all products, so I'm not sure if it is something that can be fixed. Occasionally the capacity is not as expected, especially when the system is under a certain type of attack. There should be better alerts for when attacks are happening. I'm not sure if this is already possible or not, but the solution should work to integrate with extension servers or state intelligence servers. Users should be able to see portions of the ICS more easily. That way, we wouldn't have to rely on other systems and this solution would be more of an all-in-one option for companies like ours. View full review »
I'm a manager, so I'm not someone who's working closely with the solution. It's also in the deployment phase, so we haven't spent enough time with the solution to really judge what is missing or not. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection vs. Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
443,152 professionals have used our research since 2012.