Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Reviews

We primarily use the solution for security.

Overall, the solution is okay.

We have a central console and from there you can monitor all workstations via an agent. The agent is installed on workstations and servers and after that, the agent can contact the central server from which we can see all of the information. We can see if the antivirus has been updated, if the solution has been detecting anything, or if there are any issues, for example. 

The pricing is very good. It's quite cheap. It might be one of the least expensive. 

It does not cover all of our security issues. It's not a complete security solution. We'd like something like CrowdStrike Falcon. We'd like the same features as CrowdStike. If they can have even better features than CrowdStrike in the future, it would be better.

The solution lacks EDR features.

The solution is cheaper than other products. However, it's not as complete. 

We are looking to evaluate CrowdStrike. We understand that that solution covers more features.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. It's a good product, however, it does not cover enough for us. We need something more expansive.

We mainly use this solution for end user data protection, and cloud security.

We particularly appreciate how scalable this solution is, as we often need to increase our end-user numbers.

The license prices for this solution are quite high.

We have been using this solution for four years.

We have found this solution to be easily and quickly scalable.

The technical support for this solution are very quick to respond when we raise issues with them.

We were using a different product previously, but switched to this solution because it has all of the features that we require.

The initial setup for this product was very straightforward. However, deployment times will vary, depending on which client we are working with, and their particular requirements.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

Our company uses the solution to provide security protection for clients in higher education and in the Ethiopian financial industry such as bankers and microfinance. 

The solution provides high-end security that is critical for financial institutions and bankers. 

The interface is intuitive with no issues. 

Documentation needs to be simplified and improved so that it provides good product awareness for end users like the documentation provided by CheckPoint. 

Vouchers and training should be offered to enhance the solution's reachability. Certification exams should be accessible and priced reasonably. 

I have been using the solution for one year. 

The solution is stable. 

The solution is scalable. 

Technical support is good and provides well-documented materials. 

The setup and installation are not complicated. 

Our company implements the solution for customers. 

The solution is expensive in comparison to CheckPoint and Fortinet. 

Our company purchased a three-year license that included a warranty and technical support. 

Our company is moving to CheckPoint because we are the only premium partners in East Africa so that increases our market value.

We also like FortiEDR for endpoint securities. 

I recommend trying the solution because of its security sensitivities. 

I rate the solution a seven out of ten. 

We use Kaspersky for our cash machines, 200 of which we have around the country. We use it to control the USB ports so nobody can use them without authorization from the owner. 

Currently, we implementing a new use case concerning our response when we get an alert.

In the past year, many banks have seen cases of ATM looting. We wanted to prevent that, which is why we implemented Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response. We are a bank and we haven't had any issues like the orders. Kaspersky helped us a lot. It helped up prevent unauthorized USB port usage. 

I would like to integrate Kaspersky with my Log Collector SIEM. Right now that's not possible. 

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response could also introduce a way to make working in teams more accessible. At the same time, it would be interesting to see them explore artificial intelligence solutions. 

I have been using this solution for two years. 

My impression of the stability of this solution is good. We have not had any issues with stability. 

We have not had any performance issues and our board really likes the solution. Our facility and technical support teams use this solution as they manage the cash machines. 

I think they are good and we haven't had any problems with them. We haven't had any critical issues that would have required us to call the US technical support of US; we have only been in touch with local technical support.

We previously used Sophos, Crowdstrike, and Microsoft Defender. The most important reason we transitioned to Kaspersky is the agent that is installed in the end points on the cash machine. The Kaspersky agent is really soft. With the others, we noticed that their agents would stop, so that made a big difference.

We used three or four people to deploy and maintain the solution. 

Our current monthly costs are $1,000. 

You have to be really informed about the process of using this tool before deploying. With our use case with the cash machines, for example, implementing the white list could have been really hard work for us if we had not had previous experience with it.

I use Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response for security protection for our endpoints for the users.

There is a problem with the solution, it came from Russia and we are looking for a replacement.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response for approximately two years.

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is a stable solution.

I have found Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response not to be scalable.

We have approximately 700 users using the solution. We do not have plans to increase usage. We are looking to switch solutions.

We were using Panda Antivirus previously.

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response's initial installation were straightforward. To installation of the solution on the end-users systems takes 10 minutes. However, from the console, it is a little more time, approximately two days to configure.

We only needed one person for the implementation and support of the solution. We had some support hours from the vendor if needed.

We were on a three-year license to use Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response. The price could be better.

I would not recommend this solution to others. We are moving to different solutions.

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response an eight out of ten.

The tool helps us to protect from hacking, malware, phishing, etc.

I like the tool’s response to malware and trojans.

The product should release more frequent updates. The tool needs to improve its scalability as well.

I have been using the solution for three to four years.

The solution is stable and I would rate it a nine out of ten.

The solution is scalable and I would rate it an eight out of ten. My company has around 500 users for the solution. We plan to increase the number of users. In the next two to three years, the number of users will be doubled.

I didn’t encounter any issues hence haven’t contacted tech support yet.

The tool’s setup is straightforward. The setup gets completed within a day.

We did the solution’s deployment in-house.

We have seen ROI with the solution’s use.

The solution’s pricing is okay.

I would rate the overall solution a nine out of ten. One IT administrator is enough to manage the solution. You need to regularly update the solution. If you don’t update regularly, then you will have more chances of encountering security threats. You need to also refrain from using unknown software.

I mainly use EDR to scan publicly-hosted servers and ensure they get automatically segregated upon detection of any threat.

Version 14.0 comes with an SQL database, which gives great flexibility on control, reviewing logs, and viewing history.

There are some issues with EDR's web policy blocking sites that are marked as exceptions. Also, recently, some policies have been getting disabled automatically. In the next release, EDR should include a web plugin.

I've been using EDR for two years.

We haven't had any issues with EDR's stability and have had full uptime over the last two years.

EDR is scalable - we've used it for 500 workstations.

Kaspersky have stopped providing free support, and their default support is only available on weekdays.

If you have all the installers downloaded and prerequisites ready, EDR can be deployed within an hour or two.

EDR is priced on the cheaper side. Licensing for EDR is available on a yearly basis for around 80 SAR a year.

EDR is a very good tool that can be used for a large user base without lag. I would rate EDR eight out of ten.

This solution is used for network security.

The most valuable feature is endpoint protection.

The solution can improve by providing automatic fixing of vulnerabilities and reducing the resources used in the server component and endpoint agent. They are very bulky and use a lot of CPU, memory, and hard drive resources.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response for approximately six years.

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is stable.

I have found this solution not to be scalable.

Our clients that are using this solution are small-sized businesses.

The technical support for this solution is not good. They do not have the availability of resources.

The installation is very easy.

The price of the solution could be reduced.

Those wanting to implement this solution have to understand that fine-tuning and adjusting their policy plan has to be a regular activity.

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response a seven out of ten.