We have not seen many tickets which tells us it is very stable.

As for the stability, no issues up until now.

I would rate the stability of this solution an eight, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best.

The solution is stable.

MuleSoft offers two kinds of solutions for customers, a MuleSoft-hosted one and a customer-hosted one.

If the customer chooses the MuleSoft-hosted platform, the licensing will be negotiated.

But if the platform is custom-built to your application, the cost won't be that high. Clients usually have their own servers.

The solution looks to be stable. It is reliable so far. there are no bugs or glitches, and it doesn't crash or freeze. 

Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager is pretty stable.

We use the CloudHub which is the MuleSoft cloud version it has everything that is required for a product with high availability and reliability. It's pretty stable.

Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager is stable.

The stability of the solution is pretty good. There are no bugs or glitches and it doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

It is a stable product. 

I rate the stability a ten out of ten because there have not been any issues so far. I am confident we can add more APIs.

The solution is stable. I'd rate it ten out of ten. There are no bugs or glitches, and it doesn't crash or freeze. 

We have a massive set up and definitely, there are sometimes a few issues, which come here and there, however, we manage to build a resiliency inside that.

Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager has been stable and my usage. However, there have been some issues with SMTP connectors.

The product offers a very stable platform. We've had a couple of issues, however, it's a stable platform overall. Due to the API, there may be some buggy codes. We have not had any major issues, and, if we do, the technical support is very responsive to our queries.  

Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

It is stable and has no problems. 

The solution is very stable. I would rate its stability an eight out of ten. 

The solution is a stable one. But as the API stack has been increasing, whenever the new stack is saving, at the end of the day we have got our own Kubernetes to connect the APIs completely. The capacity has been increasing day by day, so we have to increase the capacity. We have to do so regularly. At least quarterly, we have to do some capacity planning for that. It's not cost-effective and it's got a cost impact too. We have to invest something around a few thousand dollars to enhance this capability.

Their method is not cost-effective. It's some costly, but for the performance and the overall customers who are using our APIs and what we're doing internally, we're happy with that. The organization is ready to bear that cost, but our only concern is they have to address our tasks. Whenever we seek their assistance they should address our task quickly. They should not insist to us that somebody from there will show up and do some due diligence. I think that is not required for all the customers because we feel that we're mature enough to tackle our own Mulesoft, whatever the day to day usage is concerned. We don't need their assistance anymore.

If we need them we will definitely put in some clear understanding that we need their assistance. But in future, we might only need assistance for Docker and Kubernetes because we're having some challenges over here. Or, in relation to security, we might need their assistance. 

It's stable.

This solution is stable but it is important to remember that it is the glue between other systems that might have issues with instability. The MuleSoft platform connects all of the systems together and collects data from different sources to create new types of data and new statistics.

In general, it is used on a daily basis and most of the time, it's stable.

It is a stable software.

Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager is very stable.

I would rate the stability of this solution a 10, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the least stable, and 10 being the most stable.

It is highly stable, and that's why MuleSoft is booming. Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager internally uses the AWS availability zone. When one availability zone is down, then it will automatically route to another availability zone. You will not find this kind of stability on-premises because you can have server issues. However, on the cloud it's very stable and very reliable.

The stability is pretty good, I haven't seen any issues with it.

I would rate the stability a nine out of ten. It's mostly stable. However, sometimes, visibility is less in terms of monitoring messages. We lack the capability to restart queues on our own, which is why I rated it nine. Otherwise, it's reliable for regular use.

I found the stability of MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager good, so the solution is a ten out of ten in that area.

Anypoint's reliability is very good, we've had no issues with it.

The product is stable and has 15 nodes.

This is a stable solution if the hardware is set up properly. You need to monitor the load of the APIs and the bandwidth they use to achieve maximum throughput. 

There have been no stability issues.

The solution is stable.

The solution is stable. It's good. There are no bugs or glitches and it does not crash or freeze. The performance has been good. 

Stability is very good. 

The solution is stable. 

The stability of the solution is excellent.

No.

Stability-wise, it has been excellent.

The stability is good. They are powerful products.