I can pay, for my environment, between $30,000 and $40,000 a year, and that's a pretty good deal.

We pay $30,000 a year for 275 endpoints. We're growing, so I plan to buy another 75 endpoints. There is still a year and a half left in my three-year subscription, so I'm going to increase my endpoint count by 30 percent.

I'm buying midterm. We're a little over our licensing right now—less than 10%—but we'll correct our device count and plan for future growth. We pay for additional managed detection and Ranger network scanning.

Purely from a budget perspective, Sentinel One was more expensive than my previous vendor, plus I lost a lot of features. I can't say that I see cost savings yet while using the solution. 

I have no information on the pricing or licensing cost for SentinelOne Singularity Complete.

We previously had a different EDR solution called CrowdStrike, which was very robust but also very expensive. It did not have the features we were looking for from a legacy standpoint. My understanding is that we did a pretty good deal on SentinelOne. A part of that is because we were their customers very early on, and we also use their products a lot. We are interested in the new products that come out. We go to their demos, and we go to their events. We do save a lot of money. It is not cheap, but it is worth it. We spend a lot of money on a lot of things, and most of them do not do as much as SentinelOne.

It has gotten more expensive over time, but we have also gotten more features and value out of it. They have added things to it. From a pricing standpoint, it is expensive. It is one of the more expensive tools we have, but it also does more than almost every other tool that we have in our environment, so it makes sense.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete is aggressively priced compared to smaller solutions. Still, in the past, as I worked for a SentinelOne reseller partner that deployed SentinelOne solutions to a lot of different customers, I was able to appreciate its capabilities and full features, which is part of the reason my company has implemented SentinelOne Singularity Complete.

The solution is a bit cheaper than CrowdStrike Falcon Pro and more expensive than smaller solutions. Still, it has a pretty reasonable pricing point, as I appreciate the flexibility SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers. I haven't been disappointed with its pricing because I'm more of a "not everything cheaper is better" person. It's not better if it makes the worst product.

I'm very satisfied with SentinelOne Singularity Complete, especially its price because I've worked with various companies. Yet, I found that no one provides a really good solution for the price except for SentinelOne.

The licensing is comparable to other solutions in the market. The pricing is competitive.

We subscribe to the Managed Detection and Response (MDR) service called Vigilance, which is like an extension of our SOC. Vigilance's services help us with mitigating and responding to any suspicious, malicious threats that SentinelOne detects. Vigilance takes care of those. 

We also pay for the support. The endpoint license and support are part of the base package, but we bought the extended package of Vigilance Managed Detection and Response (MDR) services.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete's pricing is affordable. They offer licenses from zero to a hundred making it accessible even for smaller businesses.

The pricing is good. It's a big factor for us. Their pricing comes in at much less than Fortinet or CrowdStrike.

The cost of utilizing all the features of SentinelOne Singularity Complete is high.

The pricing is good. They are in line with the market.

There are a couple of different solutions that they offer. The one I use is $6 a month per device. Some are $4 and there are some that are more than that, and those offer an MDR part, which is the managed detection and response. 

SentinelOne was half the price of CrowdStrike.

I believe that the current pricing and licensing structure is fair. While it may not be a budget-friendly solution, I think it's reasonable considering what we are receiving.

I'm not sure of the pricing. That's above me. I'm a technical person. It's not my arena.

Our organization is very satisfied with SentinelOne Singularity Complete, especially compared to other options available. It is very affordable and easy to license, and it allows us to onboard new analysts quickly, with a turnaround time of one day at most.

When we were checking out different platforms we did get a price from Microsoft and it was unreasonable. SentinelOne was definitely reasonable and worth the money.

I rate Singularity Complete a seven out of ten for affordability. It's more expensive than our previous solution, but it does its job well. At the same time, there is some room for improvement. Cheaper is always better.

The pricing is packaged in with our MSSP. The cost of endpoint protection is fairly reasonable. Some of the other systems are a little expensive, but there's still value behind them. It's pretty close to what I would expect.

We are happy with it. It is cheaper than some of the other things we pay for. It is not the cheapest, but it also is not outrageous, so we are happy with it. 

The price is costly compared to what we were previously paying with Microsoft Defender and McAfee.

After negotiations, the pricing was found to be fair.

We buy the licensing in bulk. From a pricing standpoint, because we buy in bulk, we get very good pricing. Based on its functionality and capabilities, it is well worth the price. I do not think it is at all expensive based on what you get in the solution. We use the complete up to the core. Our pricing is probably a little bit more than somebody who is on the core. In general, it is well worth what you get for the price you pay.

I got a really good deal so I'm very happy with the pricing.

The pricing for SentinelOne Singularity Complete is competitive. SentinelOne has a better price out of the box compared to Carbon Black and CrowdStrike.

The cost of Singularity Complete is similar to our previous solution but it comes with additional options such as Kubernetes integration. We make sure to benchmark the prices against other EDR solutions before renewal to ensure we are not overpaying.

The pricing was very similar in terms of its competitors, but I believe SentinelOne's capability and willingness to attract new business allowed us to save some extra money. I think the pricing aligns well with the market. They encountered competition, so their pricing was slightly more adaptable. That's where we gained an advantage from it.

We do not encounter a lot of issues with the pricing of SentinelOne. The pricing is reasonable.

The solution offers a standard licensing fee.

There are cheaper options out there that I know are not as effective. I have administered several of them, not for this organization but for others. The thing I like about SentinelOne is that I know that if it raises an alert, it is worth looking at, so we are not dealing with a lot of false positives. It is rare.

We have not been beaten in the market by pricing, so we have been feeling good about that. The discussions we have had over the years keep us at a very low price per unit. It can always get better, but we also know there is a cost to the backend.

We did receive a competitive price for SentinelOne Singularity Complete. However, I believe the retail pricing, or MSRP, is a bit high. I hope we can get the same competitive pricing through our reseller when it comes time to renew. I still believe there are benefits to the solution, even if we had to pay the list price. However, I think they could be more competitive with their upfront pricing.

The pricing is fair. It's not cheap, nor is it expensive.

Nothing good is cheap, and SentinelOne is no exception. However, as a market leader with a great product, they don't have to be so timid with their pricing. I would like to see lower prices, but I understand why they charge what they do. It is what it is when it comes to SentinelOne Singularity Complete.

It is very competitive with other solutions that are on the market. At least the last time we renewed, it was very competitive.

I find the licensing cost for SentinelOne Singularity Complete fair.

The pricing and licensing make sense. We worked with a third party to help us with licensing, and the licensing we obtained through that process was ultimately reasonable and comparable to other products on the market.

Its price is per endpoint per year. One of the features of its licensing is that it is a multi-tenanted solution. From an MSSP point of view, if I want to have several different virtual clouds of customers, it is supported natively, which is not the case with, for example, Microsoft Defender.

Another nice thing about it is that you can buy one license if you want to. Some vendors insist that you buy 50 or 100, whereas here, you can just buy one.

The Singularity product has three versions: Singularity Core, Singularity Control, and Singularity Complete. The Singularity Complete one is really what I consider an enterprise rate solution. The middle one, Control, is more than adequate. In terms of price, it works out very similar to what you would pay for Kaspersky or for any other solution. The licensing per endpoint, per year, and per version is progressively more expensive for the Core, Control, and Complete versions. 

The interesting thing is that it is possible to upgrade across the versions without a major change. If a customer buys the most basic installation and would like some of the features out of the middle, it is possible.

In the past, we had to purchase licenses in advance, so if we hit our license limit, we could not expand until we got a signed agreement in place with the sales rep after the back-and-forth. That meant if a client had ransomware and they had 200 agents, we couldn't deploy right away if we were up against our limit. So we always had that balancing act of figuring out if we were close to our limit and whether we needed to buy more licenses? We ended up paying for licenses we didn't need because we had to buy them in packages of 100.

We now pay based on usage. They do an audit once a quarter and calculate any overages. We pay a set amount quarterly, based on our licenses in use, and then they true-up the figure. Right now we have 12,800 agents with SentinelOne on them. We charge our clients monthly, so it would be really difficult for us to write a check to SentinelOne, in advance, for a full year's worth, at that level. It's been great for us to have the quarterly payments.

Since we are a French company in France, we partnered with a company called Arrange which is our vendor. We did some quotes and found they have a reasonable price for this kind of technology. SentinelOne offers one of the best software quotes and has excellent reviews and everything.

The licensing is done per device.

I'm not directly involved in the licensing process and can't speak to the exact costs. 

SentinelOne's licensing costs are reasonable. I can't provide hard numbers, but I can say that SentinelOne is a much better solution with better value and a lower cost than the McAfee ePO. 

We are on a subscription model by choice. Therefore, we are paying a premium for the flexibility. We would have huge cost savings if we committed to a three-year buy-in. So, it's more expensive than the other solutions that we were looking at, but we have the flexibility of a subscription model. I think the pricing is fair. For example, if we had a three-year tie-in SentinelOne versus Cylance or one of the others, there is not that much difference in pricing. There might be a few euro or dollars here and there, but it's negligible.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete's price point is excessive compared to the functionality it provides.

I do not know much about it. From what I understand, it is pricey, but it works. It is a very good product. 

SentinelOne Singularity Complete is expensive compared to Microsoft but not Sophos. However, it is worth the price for its quick response and immediate remediation options.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete can be expensive for the SMB market but is suitable for enterprise-level organizations. The service provided by SentinelOne is not up to par with the cost we are paying.

I don't have any visibility on the pricing. 

I rate the price of SentinelOne a ten out of ten, meaning it is the best price in the market. This is because SentinelOne has a nominal cost. For example, if CrowdStrike costs $1000, SentinelOne provides the same features for about $7 to $8.

It is comparable. Something that I look at for the long term is how sustainable it is. There is quite a bit in the security portfolio that I manage, and we will see.

The pricing is reasonable. It may be a little high, but it's on par with everything out there.

I wish the more users you have, the better the price would be.

Their pricing was extremely competitive. That is why we stayed with them so long. We are renewing at the end of next month. We have already put in the approval. It is all set to go. We are renewing for another year or so year over year. It has been a very effective product, and it has been priced very competitively.

The tool's price is reasonable.

The licensing is convenient, straightforward, and very clear. I care more about the breakdown of the license than the licensing itself. Some vendors have very complex licensing schemes. SentinelOne's licensing scheme is very clean.

The price of Singularity Complete compared to some of its competitors is competitive.

The price is fair for what we are getting.

I rate Singularity Complete four out of 10 for affordability. SentinelOne costs more than traditional antivirus solutions, but we get more out of it. It hasn't saved us any money, but it's an EDR solution, so we get a lot of value from it. 

The solution is a bit pricey and they should look at the costs involved. You have to pay extra for certain features, such as the Ranger feature. Everything should be included in the subscription. 

They were very good about finding a price that could work for us. I'm not the bean counter, so I don't know exactly what the end cost was, but I do know that we got them at a time of the most financial stress we had been under and they found a way to make it work for us. It was a three-year contract and everyone fully expected the price to take a significant jump because the capabilities of the solution had been significantly increased with no additional costs. We expected it to maybe even be priced out and they did not. It went up a slight bit, which you can expect, but they worked with us. We were one of the first companies to go with them here, in Ohio. They have a lot of respect for their loyal customers. They worked with us and allowed us to keep this high-level product and actually add more licenses to it without breaking our bank.

In terms of additional costs, they've added something called Ranger and another layer of deep visibility. The base console doesn't come with that. Ranger is threat hunting and we were able to use the Ranger and the visibility, which is the threat hunting and of course the deep visibility and more in-depth storyline. We were able to use that, but we hardly ever needed that for our environment and the way we use the product. Because of that, we did not opt to have those in our current console.

We do more threat response than hunting. We put the latest and greatest agent out there and it's backed by this particular product but we just simply don't have the personnel to do it like we used to. That's the one thing we're missing. If you were to add the deep visibility and the threat hunting capability onto it, it would be a little bit more. I don't think it's that much of a significant cost, but I don't know the end results of the prices. Because we didn't make use of those two functionalities, they just cut it out.

You have to look at the kinds of problems you can end up with and the fact that you want security against them, and then SentinelOne is not expensive. That's the way I would sell it. 

If you avoid having one outbreak a year, just one, then SentinelOne is worth the money. When you have that one outbreak and it spreads across your complete network, it means days of work are gone. For a complete environment like ours, with 300-plus users, it would be very expensive.

Pricing is a bit of a pain point. That's where we have not been able to convince all of our customers to use SentinelOne. The pricing is still on the higher side. It's almost double the price, if not more, of a normal antivirus, such as NOD32, Kaspersky, or Symantec.

I understand that these are not similar products, but for a customer who has a certain amount of money to pay for an antivirus, they can only spend so much. That's where it becomes hard to convince them to pay double the price for endpoint security.

That is the only feature of this product which causes us to step back and not be able to deploy it for absolutely every customer we have. We would love to, but obviously if the customer doesn't have the budget to pay for it, there is not much we can do.

If they can somehow bring the prices down, that would massively help in bringing this to a lot more customers.

The pricing makes sense to us. The pricing model is simple. It was easy to move forward from our previous products to the new bundle.

I do not know much about the pricing. What I do know is that the person who negotiates most of the pricing is quite a hard bargainer. In that regard, he often says that he managed to get a very good deal. When we first looked at replacing our old system with Singularity Complete, its price was definitely a big factor. Back then, Singularity Complete was fairly new to the marketplace. We got quite a good deal as an early adopter. They have honored that and respected that we were an early adopter, and I feel we are still getting a very good price.

The solution is fairly priced for what you get. 

Singularity is fairly priced. 

SentinelOne Singularity Complete meets all enterprise requirements and is priced accordingly.

The licensing is handled by another team. I can't speak to the exact cost of the product.

I'm not involved with purchasing decisions, but I believe Singularity must be cost-effective because the management selected it. 

It is comparatively cheap in the market and provides a good price point.

The price is pretty good. It is reasonable. It's one of the reasons we went with them. Palo Alto, in comparison, was pretty expensive. The price of Cylance was reasonable and somewhere in the middle, however, SentinelOne feature-wise gave us everything we needed for a good price. 

SentinelOne Singularity Complete is fairly priced. After discussing the per-user cost, we found it to be acceptable for the functionality it offers, and we are happy with the protection it provides.

The product's pricing is at par with what you see among major competitors. It's higher than McAfee, yet cheaper than CrowdStrike. 

Singularity isn't cheap, but it's worth what we pay for it. 

SentinelOne Singularity Complete is expensive, but we must be willing to pay for it if we want a high level of protection.

Licensing is paid on a yearly basis. I can't speak to the exact pricing. 

Its cost is yearly. It is not much costlier than other leading products available in the market. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete is cheaper than CrowdStrike but more expensive than any traditional anti-virus solution.

The license is per user.

The pricing is comparable with other vendors but some customers find it a bit costly. There is a bit of pricing flexibility with the solution, but initial quotes can surprise customers. 

I rate pricing a six out of ten. 

The pricing of SentinelOne is less than McAfee.

The solution is reasonably priced.

I found the pricing for SentinelOne Singularity Complete reasonable, which is one of the reasons my company went with it.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete's pricing is not terrible. It's not enough to make us want to move away from using SentinelOne. The solution's pricing is not too bad for what it's offering, like the documentation that comes with it. I feel like it should be an optional add-on for people who may not be using things to integrate or may not want to integrate things.

The pricing is very reasonable. Unfortunately, because it's a cloud-based product, it has a minimum count for licensing, but other than that, I've found their pricing to be incredibly reasonable and competitive with tools that are very similar.

Considering the invaluable nature of SentinelOne's autonomous behavior, I don't believe anyone else can measure up to that. That makes it an incredible bargain when compared to the cost of an incident for any company.

There are no fees other than their standard licensing fees.

Singularity is reasonable, but a few clients say it's expensive because they're comparing it with traditional antivirus. The pricing could be much cheaper for the Asia-Pacific region because it's a price-sensitive market.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete is a fair price.

I don't deal with the cost side of things, but the licensing, as far as endpoints go, is a pretty straightforward and simple process.

My understanding is the pricing is reasonable. 

I cannot speak to the exact cost. Our managers buy the licenses. That said, it is my understanding that we are using the subscription model and pay for it yearly. I'm not sure if there are any other ancillary fees beyond that.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete is reasonably priced. Compared to other products I've used in the past, such as CrowdStrike, it is significantly less expensive. I can easily find evidence of this price difference, so I believe that SentinelOne is a fairly priced product.

It is not sold as a consumer product. It is only sold based on the number of licenses. So, as an MSP, you're probably going to pay about three and a half dollars per license, per month to have SentinelOne.

This solution is less expensive than its competitors. You might need to buy additional space depending on how much they are willing to provide. I would rate the pricing a five out of five.

I cannot speak to the exact pricing. That said, it's very reasonable. I'd rate it five out of five in terms of affordability. There are cheaper options; however, it is quite affordable. We pay a yearly licensing fee. 

SentinelOne can cost approximately $70 per device.

The pricing of the solution seems reasonable, we got a discount but it still seems reasonable. The licensing cost is $3 to $4 per endpoint and can be paid monthly or yearly, with the price changing according to commitment. 

The pricing level for this service and application was very interesting for us. I don't know exactly what the price was, but apparently it was a big surprise that the SOC was also included in our pricing model.

The Deep Visibility feature practically double the price. Because we have a SOC, we rely on them to have insights about all the threats, so we are not monitoring our environment ourselves. It is mostly done by the SentinelOne SOC. That is the reason why we decided not to go for this feature.

The licensing is okay. I don't see any issues with it.

The licensing is okay. I don't think it is bad. Depending on which one you get, I think it is fifty dollars for each user annually. The more users you have, the cheaper it is.

The price is reasonable in terms of what the product offers. SentinelOne is more affordable than some competing products, and it's not overly expensive for what you're getting.

Its pricing is competitive. 

The pricing is great. I don't have any issues with it.

I'm not sure of the exact pricing of the solution. That's handled by a different team.

Pricing is okay and costs almost the same as Trend Micro. We have a partnership with SentinelOne, and it costs about $30 to $35 per user per year.

SentinelOne isn't cheap, but it's less expensive than CrowdStrike It's priced competitively. There are no add-ons. We have a Singularity Complete license, which includes everything we need for endpoint protection. 

As a developer, I have no information on the pricing of SentinelOne.

The pricing is reasonable. 

I'm not sure of the exact costs, as those are managed by a different team.

We pay to license every year. However, I’m not sure of the pricing. They might cost $100 each. It’s reasonably priced. I’d rate it four out of five in terms of affordability.

The per-seat cost is low, but you have to commit to a certain number of licenses for a year.

The license is paid annually and is competitive. There are features that are not included in the licensing cost but it does include Vigilance and STAR.

Licensing is part of the procurement team. I can't speak to the exact cost of the product.

The costs are really rather minimal for what you receive with the product. No real advisement here. The larger count you have, the deeper discount you will receive in your contract.

For our use case, the solution is affordable. There are not any hidden fees.

At this time it is only a trial. After the trial period, I am going to purchase two licenses from SentinelOne. To make comparisons too and continue investigating both products.

Just buy the Capture Client and buy the installer itself in a license of 100,000, or whatever is needed. You don't need to invest in any management tools because they are already installed, and maintenance from the client will keep everything up and running. 

The pricing is very fair for the solution they provide.

Aside from the standard licensing fee, the only other costs are for the hardware, because we use Hyper-V on-premises.

The pricing is on the higher end, making it less suitable for small or medium-sized businesses and perhaps not the ideal fit for the public sector where budget constraints may be more pronounced. I would recommend it more as an enterprise-level product.

The license for the solution is quite expensive, but it is cheaper than CrowdStrike. However, if you consider specific organization requirements, it has covered them all, so we might move to CrowdStrike after evaluating three years. Then, we assess the kind of tool in line with our requirements and implement the latest and the best tool in the quadrant, and currently, in Cambodia, CrowdStrike and TrendMicro are more popular.

When it came to the price compared to other solutions we tested, SentinelOne Singularity gave us the price of our expectations whereas CrowdStrike could not.

The cost of the solution varies and depends on your relationship with the supplier. My cost is USD $6 per end point. I don't have additional costs on top of that.

The pricing is reasonable. I'm an engineer and therefore can't speak to exact pricing. 

It was cheaper than McAfee, which was a way to convince management to go with the solution.

The solution's price/performance ratio is reasonable.

In addition to the standard licensing fees there is, of course, the SOC service fee.

For the functionality you get, the pricing is pretty good. I'd rate it four out of five in terms of affordability.

There are actually three versions of this product: the user version, professional, and professional plus. If analysts need to see something, like what the users are doing, what processes are running, we can go to the console and see. The traditional version only shows when incidents happen. I think the next time we renew, we'd go with the lesser version because it shows enough information. 

There aren't additional costs to the standard licensing.

The cost is a bit high. It's around $8 per client per month.

I believe that SentinelOne is quite an expensive solution. 

If you are an end-user you should procure the service through a Managed Cyber Security Systems Provider.

The product is reasonably priced. 

Our licensing fees are about $5 USD per endpoint, per month.

The pricing is rather elevated. However, the solution is the most transparent for the uses I have ever encountered as well as being normally very informative and accurate for our engineers.

The price for it is very competitive compared to other Next Gen EPP. You can really get a great value for it when it is integrated with EDR.

Spend money on the security for the endpoint. That is where the data lies and where hackers try an attack, not the network or firewalls.

SentinelOne's pricing could be lower.

The pricing appears to be pretty affordable.

Our customers pay for monthly for the license of SentinelOne.

Its price can be lower because I'm seeing competition from another vendor who beats it on commercials.

The price of SentinelOne is on the higher side compared to other solutions, such as Symantec.

The price is competitive, if you compare it with other solutions on the market.