Ubuntu Linux Reviews

We use Ubuntu Linux as an operating system for daily use. We use it for many purposes, for example, supporting, developing, configuring, and scripting.

The solution has high fantastic performance.

Ubuntu Linux could improve by having better documentation because sometimes their documentation is not very good.

I have been using Ubuntu Linux for approximately 10 years.

Ubuntu Linux is stable.

We have 200 people using this solution in my organization.

Ubuntu Linux is easy to install. We already configured it to auto-install for other Linux servers. The process takes not more than 15 minutes.

For the implementation and maintenance of the solution, we have approximately six people.

We are saving money from not having to pay for an operating system that costs our company money because Ubuntu Linux is free to use.

We are using the free and open-sourced version of the solution.

I would recommend this solution to others because it is free and you can save licensing costs.

I rate Ubuntu Linux a ten out of ten.

It is useful for web servers, email servers, and file servers. I am using its latest version.

It is open-source, secure, and easy to use.

It can have more security.

I have been using this solution for 20 years.

It is stable.

It is scalable. We currently have around ten users. We don't have any plans to increase its usage.

I am satisfied with their technical support.

I have used FreeBSD.

Its initial setup is straightforward. It took about 20 minutes.

I did it myself. We have a team of six engineers for deployment and maintenance. 

It is open-source. We don't have to pay for its license.

I would rate Ubuntu Linux a ten out of ten.

We mainly use this solution for application-related uses. We use it as our main Linux platform of choice. 

One of the best features is that it is constantly updated.

I have been using Ubuntu Linux for more than 15 years.

Ubuntu Linux is both stable and scalable.

I have never contacted their support team.

We actually use both Ubuntu Linux and CentOS, but CentOS is being decommissioned so our choice is Ubuntu.

Ubuntu Linux was very easy to deploy. You can install Ubuntu in many different ways and all of them are pretty straightforward. I also have a lot of experience with Ubuntu, so for me, the initial installation is very easy.

A team of four people is required for maintenance and deployment.

Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I would give Ubuntu Linux a rating of ten. More people should use this solution.

• Package management
• Stability
• Customization

Using LAMP services really improves all of the infrastructure.

Patch management.

We have been using this solution for six years.

I did not encounter any issues with deployment.

I did not encounter any issues with scalability.

I did not encounter any issues with scalability.

I have not used customer service.

I have not used technical support.

We used FreeBSD. We moved to Ubuntu, because FreeBSD package management is very difficult.

I was involved in the setup and it was straightforward.

We implemented it on our own.

It is free.

We evaluated other options.

Great job, Ubuntu team. Keep it up.

We use the solution to run our business applications.

The solution works well. It represents the standard product in our field. 

The solution could be more user-friendly, as I use Mac on a day to day basis. 

I have been using Ubuntu Linux for five years. 

The solution is definitely stable. 

The solution is definitely scalable. 

In our experience with customer service we have definitely been satisfied. 

The installation did not propose an issue for me as I was not involved in this process. 

We have a company which helped us with the installation. 

All the people involved are technical. 

The solution is open source and its use is included in the monthly fees we pay.

The solution provides good security. 

It is both on-premises and cloud-based. 

The solution really fulfills our purposes for the moment, so there is not much to note by way of improvement. 

I rate Ubuntu Linux as a ten out of ten. 

I provide products for my customers. There are no limits to this solution.

Customers can use it for almost all applications and they can use it for their own systems.

Once you are used to it, it is quite flexible. It is more powerful because you have more control over it.

It's not as easy to use as Windows by Microsoft. It could be easier to use.

I have been providing this solution to my customers for a few years.

It is stable to an extent. Microsoft and Apple are more stable.

The stability definitely can be improved. When we are implementing patches and new releases, it tends to fail.

We have one customer using Ubuntu.

We will continue to provide this solution for our customers.

There is a lot of support available on the internet. Getting solutions is not difficult.

People tend to use Google to try to solve the problem they may be having.

The initial setup can be complex. The installation could be simplified.

It can take a couple of hours to implement.

I would recommend this solution to others who are interested in using it.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

I used Ubuntu Linux for my desktop and for web servers.

I like this product much better than some other similar solutions.

The user interface could be improved, as it looks a little bit older.

We have been using Ubuntu Linux for many years.

Ubuntu Linux is stable and I plan to continue using it.

This is a scalable product. It is not used throughout the organization. Rather, I use it privately on my desktops.

I have not needed to contact technical support.

Prior to Ubuntu, I was using Debian Linux.

The installation is straightforward and it is very quick to complete.

I deployed it myself.

This is a product that I can recommend.

I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.

It's a very stable and very popular solution.

If I run an application, I need it to show up in Microsoft, so Microsoft can run in Ubuntu. It needs to connect better with Microsoft products.

This solution is stable.

This solution is scalable. We have 10 users at the moment. We plan to increase usage.

I don't have any experience with technical support. I have experience with Linux, so I am okay.

We've only ever used Microsoft products. But Microsoft is very expensive, and the system is complicated.

The initial setup is simple.

We had a consultant assist in the implementation. We need 15 people for deployment and maintenance.

I would advise using the solution because it's a very stable system and very fast and you are charged no money for using them.

My number one choice, for the work I do, is Red Hat, but it's very expensive. Number two is Ubuntu, which works for small systems and has good value.

I think that Ubuntu offers more than Microsoft. Microsoft is no good. There are lots of versions of Windows, but many errors and there's no stable system.

I would rate this solution 2 out of 10.