We performed a comparison between BrowserStack, Galen Framework, and Tricentis Tosca based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools."The product guides and resources are extensive and very helpful."
"BrowserStack's best feature is browser testing across different platforms, including mobile."
"The main core concept behind this product is, it takes the overhead of maintaining all of your devices or particular computers. It continuously adds the latest devices that are coming into the market."
"I like that it offers full device capability."
"It is a stable solution. There's no lagging and jittering."
"Local testing for products with no public exposure is an advantage in development."
"The most valuable feature is the variety the solution offers around the different types of devices, especially mobile devices."
"I have found that BrowserStack is stable."
"What I like most about Galen Framework are its advantages, particularly its spec language and the spec file feature."
"We have multiple applications, and it supports parallel execution. It has mobile automation."
"It can provide all levels of testing from design to execution to reporting."
"Tosca BI is important to make sure that our data integrity is in check and validated; to make sure our data is good. Our data is the number-one important driver for our company, so if that's not good, we have some big problems."
"I would rate the scalability a nine out of ten. We have enterprise-level customers."
"As a codeless automation tool, the product offers a user-friendly experience without requiring extensive coding knowledge. Users can easily handle various applications, including web applications, SAP applications, Windows applications, and even Salesforce applications, without manual coding."
"The use of automation is most valuable."
"The feature that I have found the most valuable is the recovery and cleanup process. Suppose there is a list of test cases and one test case has failed, it should not impact the other test cases. We can reuse the same test case. We can change the configuration of parameters and then use the test cases on the same thing. So, that's a useful thing. Otherwise, we have to use the cleanup process. Another useful feature is to have our own library files. We can create our objects in the libraries and reuse them. There is no need to create duplicate data for that. They have been giving some enhancements recently which means integration is also there. They've integrated with different software like Jenkins, Bamboo. So, we can also create pipeline points. They have recently given SAP and everything, which is very useful."
"This solution is very easy to learn and any non-programmer or manual tester, with little experience in automation, can pick it up quite easily."
"Sometimes BrowserStack is really slow and devices are not loading. it is really annoying and that's why we bought several newer devices because sometimes it's affecting us a lot."
"We are having difficulty with the payment system for the BrowserStack team, as they only accept credit cards and we are encountering some issues."
"If you are inactive for 30 minutes, the solution will close."
"There is some stability issue in the product, making it in areas where improvements are required."
"There is room for improvement in pricing."
"We are struggling to do local testing."
"The solution is slow."
"BrowserStack is scalable, but cost is significant for those living in Mexico."
"There don't seem to be functions available for automatically generating Galen values based on the specifications in the spec file, and this could be a potential improvement for Galen Framework."
"The tool lags in client-based applications. We have also encountered issues with the features in integrations."
"The solution needs to improve its simulation of mobile environments. Right now, that aspect is really lacking."
"Tricentis Tosca currently does not support any mobile testing and can be improved."
"The support we received from Tricentis Tosca was good, but it can improve."
"The solution should work with the Linux platform. Right now, it only runs on Windows."
"I think the downside would be licensing costs which are very high."
"I have found that some of the functions could be missed in the solution for new users. They are not obviously present."
"Tricentis Tosca could improve on its mobile automation solution."
