Acronis Cyber Protect Reviews

I think just the part that is, we can configure the system. It's backing it up, every computer, as we went. The parameters, and automatically, the program does it.

No, just the main point is we got to back up all the information in real time. That's the point.

Well, maybe in the installation part, got to do it just a little bit ... Maybe in the

installation part, if you can avoid a few things. Maybe the skip...The computer can back it up, each computer, without the username and password of the computer.
You are taking part of Microsoft Windows in order to do that thing, but if Acronis is managed through a license, can be installed without the Windows part. The security Windows part.

Do you know what I mean?

Each license has a number -- a really big number -- so Acronis can work without the Windows security. That's a very good point.

So it's gonna be faster and you will avoid a lot of problems of installation, because a lot of people don't have the technical knowledge to do it. So it's hard sometimes for the persons to do it. If you avoid that part, it's gonna be faster.

Since January 2017.

No.

I think it's really scalable for a program.

Yes, yes. Since the beginning, I was telling you I've had problems with a few usernames and passwords for Windows here because some computers have Windows 10 Home Edition, and others ones have Windows Professional Edition.

Each computer works differently with the program, because some ones are in Windows Home and some ones in Windows Pro, so the installation works differently. That's why I had to call technical support in the beginning.

Yeah. Let me tell you this. I've been working at my company for a short time, and before I worked for them, they were using Carbonite.

Carbonite doesn't back up the full information. It's a real expensive solution, and then when you try to get your information through their servers, it has a cost.

Instead, you are paying a contract by year.

How to manage the program is real easy and really fast. I don't have a

problem.

But, I told you, if the person doesn't have knowledge about networking, like what is IPRs, and what is the domain name, and very technical issues or information, that person will have a problem.

If you are the owner of the information, and even when you need it faster, you have to pay for the information, come on. It's ridiculous what they are asking for.

A few solutions, even a freeware solution, I think

The most reliable solution that I found, it was Acronis because of the program, which is why I would choose Acronis.

I'd check what the program doing, and I check Acronis do it, and the same point.

Nobody referred me to or gave me information about Acronis. I found it on the internet, and I start to read what the Acronis is capable of doing.

The way I chose Acronis is easy, because I saw a few demos that showed me how the program works.

So, with that showing, or that demo, that's why we chose Acronis.

It's really important that people have, for example, those videos or that information visually, because --

If you do not explain visually what the program doing, meaning if
people are not familiarized with software, and they won't comprehend what the program is doing.

Because Acronis Backup is an on-premises solution, there is extra overhead. It's harder to manage, and there's no real remote access. You have to physically log in to the machine to manage it. The reporting feature works fine, and you will be able to send out reports. However, that is where it stops.

The deployment could be improved and could be through a network chain. If we need to deploy two machines that are not connected to the internet but connected to two different networks, it would be great to have a machine with dual mix that has access to the backup server and to those machines. It would be like a relay that you can install on the machine with a two-mix, and that machine can then connect to your backup server and to the other machines. You should be able to see the other machines on that network and be able to deploy to it and push jobs to it.

I have been using this solution for quite a while. We have two clients who use it at present.

In terms of system-critical support, Acronis' technical support does really well. I would give them an eight out of ten for that. However, for mid-level issues, I'd give them a six out of ten. They take a long time to provide solutions.

Setting up the backup server is quite a complex process. There is a bit of a learning curve. You have to make sure that all your services are up and that the actual machine is up and running. If the machine goes down, then you won't have any visibility into what is actually happening.

The installation of the product is not as hard as the configuration process. For instance, the licensing can be quite daunting because you still need a cloud license or access to a cloud portal. This is the old legacy portal where you have to upload the license file and then register it directly from there or download a registered file that you can upload onto the machine. This would then activate the machine. If you only want to do a local backup or backup to local storage, it will work fine. However, if you try to attach cloud storage to it, then another level of complexity will come into play.

Acronis Backup is cheaper. If you install it on a hypervisor, you only pay for a single license. It would be for the backup server, and everything else will be covered by it. In that sense, it becomes a much cheaper option.

However, if you have virtual machines, then it can be more expensive. Also, if you have a lot of physical machines the cost can be higher because each entity will need a separate license. There is a monthly license cost.

If you don't want to run everything off of the cloud because you're concerned that Acronis Cloud might go down for days, Acronis Backup is a good option. It is an on-premises solution. However, it's a legacy version and is not really Acronis' mainstream product.

Overall, I would give Acronis Backup a rating of six out of ten.

We sell Acronis to our clients globally in India, Germany, Canada, the United States, London, Singapore, Malaysia, and Dubai. We are a gold partner for Acronis worldwide and are one of the biggest resellers in India.

We do cloud, on-premises, and hybrid deployments. We use this solution to assist our clients with creating multiple backups of their data. The first backup is a live copy, the second is a copy kept on their local storage, and the third backup is stored by us in the cloud. 

One of the most valuable features of Acronis is its AnyData Engine which allows any device to connect to any other device for the purpose of data restoration. They also include cyber security features within the cloud. 

One improvement that could be made is adding the option to download files in a PST format when doing a 365 or Google Cloud to cloud backup. This is something that is currently being worked on by Acronis.

A second improvement would be to support SAP databases as integration with SAP. Although Acronis do support SAP databases and a backup of complete servers as an image-level backup or volume-level backup is possible, this requires the use of certain scripts.

We have been using this solution for seven years. 

In the past seven years of using Acronis, we have not had any instability issues or lost any data that we were unable to restore. 

This is definitely a scalable product. You could backup up to 200 terabytes. There is no limitation from an infrastructure perspective.

Acronis offer good support which is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week. As we are a gold partner, we are offered first preference.  

This is a simple product and the setup of the backup can be done in 30 minutes. An infrastructure does not need to be set up to complete the setup. The setup involves creating a console, installing agents and beginning the backup.

This is a good product that is easy to use, simple, and has good security as most of the data centers are certified. 

I would suggest that organizations that are considering using this product, sign up for a 30-day trial to do a complete evaluation. 

While using this solution for my customers over the past seven years, data loss and other disasters have been prevented. Where ransom attacks have occurred, we were able to restore the data where Acronis was used to back up information. 

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

We use this solution to backup some core, critical systems in our primary data center.

The most valuable feature is its consistency. It is an established product.

I feel like this product a little bit locked in the past.

This is not a feature-rich solution.

I would like to see a more SaaS-based solution, perhaps more cloud-centric. Essentially, keeping in lock-step with the other companies out there doing platform (PaaS) or software (SaaS) as a service, solutions.

We would like a more cutting edge, cloud-based DR solution that uses, for example, compression algorithms to make sure that backups run faster.

It is a stable product.

I have never had scalability problems with it.

I have not directly spoken with technical support.

We leverage all of our operations through what used to be Dell Services but is now known as NTT Data.

Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis.

We did an evaluation of many different solutions, primarily because we were moving from more on-premise to cloud-based solutions. So, as a result of going to the cloud, we looked at the Best of Breed in the cloud space.

Ultimately, we implemented two solutions. We use a Veeam cloud backup appliance solution and a leveraged TSM environment for our core operations provider. It was decided based on cost flexibility and technology richness.

Because this solution is not feature-rich, we have looked at other solutions.

My advice for somebody who wants to implement this solution is to make sure that they understand the requirements. This includes the RTO (Recovery Time Objective) and the RPO (Recovery Point Objective). Based on the requirements, find the solution that is going to fit best for what they really want to invest in.

I would rate this solution a six out of ten.

We make use of the standalone version. The server and the box are compliant when it comes to the backup. 

It would be nice to have a partition that I can boot and reinstall when taking a backup image from the operating system. 

As we are going for CD, it would be nice to have external storage connectivity. 

The ability to integrate with different platforms should be added as a feature. It would be nice to have the restoration also from the server itself. 

We have been using Acronis Backup for two years or more.

The solution does not need to be scaled. It suits my business needs. 

We have not had occasion to contact technical support. 

The solution was easy to install and to deploy. Everything was good. 

One can do the deployment on his own. 

There is no need for a technical team. 

Our licenses come with a one-time yearly subscription fee. 

The solution is deployed locally. 

The solution suits my business needs. It works perfectly for me. There is no need for updates or added features. 

I would recommend the solution to others. 

For the moment, we use the solution solely for our servers. We are talking around 20 users. 

I rate Acronis Backup as a nine or ten out of ten. 

Our customers use this solution for backup.

Our customers can backup to local storage and they can back up or replicate to the cloud.

It is easy to deploy. It is easy to handle and easy to monitor.

The Acronis system is very powerful.

It doesn't support all of the databases. Maybe in the future, it could support databases such as MySQL, or Postgres, as these are some of the customer's needs.

We are looking for IT solutions to backup all systems that our customers are using. It supports Microsoft SQL and Microsoft Exchange, but it does not support Oracle databases or Postgres.

There are many other types of databases that Acronis does not support.

I would like to see more mobile applications available. It would be very nice.

We would like Acronis as an all-in-one, or all-in-box solution. It should be sold as storage, licensing, and application all in one unit. We like to provide complete solutions to our clients rather than having to tell them that they must purchase additional storage. With Barracuda, the device D190 comes with one terabyte backup, and no additional requests have to be made to the customer.

It would be good if Acronis could get the recommended hardware.

We have been using Acronis Backup for our customers for more than three years.

I have not encountered any bugs or glitches with this solution, and it's stable

Many times, we have worked with the recovery, it was available and very successful to restore.

We recently had an issue with a Microsoft Exchange VMware Server where it was down. We got the backup from the storage and were able to restore it. It was very nice. 

Scalability can improve. Acronis doesn't support some of the databases.

We are a technical company, we have not opened any tickets with support. We have been able to resolve the issues ourselves, so we have not required any help from Acronis support.

We are resellers for Barracuda in Jordan.

Barracuda is a very rigid backup system. All needs are available in Barracuda.

I trust Barracuda. I don't see anything missing in Barracuda. It covers our needs because there is an agent to help with other types of databases.

I would rate Barracuda a ten out of ten.

The initial setup is straightforward. It is very easy.

We use two different types of licenses for our customers.

We have a Cyber Cloud backup license and we have on-premises storage. Both can be useful for our customers.

The licensing works in nodes. For example, for every node, you have to purchase a license. If I have an Active Directory or a physical server, and I have Microsoft Exchange with a third server, SQL, I will have to purchase three licenses from Acronis.

When compared to Barracuda, the license is based on the device's storage.

It is more expensive than Acronis initially, but as the licenses increase with Acronis, Barracuda ends up being less expensive.

We have been evaluating Barracuda to learn more about the services it offers.

As for me, I prefer Barracuda.

Acronis is a good product that works well in small businesses.

I would rate Acronis Backup a nine out of ten.

I've reimaged servers and been back up and running in exactly no time with the completely new hardware. 

The Universal Restore allows you to reimage a computer without having to have all the drivers. It allows you to boot the machine; once you get the machine up and running, then you can install the drivers.

Click Here For a Free 30-Day Fully Functional Trial of Acronis Backup v12.5

It doesn't seem to do the following on the server but it does so on the work station: It does not delete locked files. So I created a small batch file that, after the backup, I go in and I run. That deletes all the extraneous lock files. I tried running the batch file automated but it would not run for some reason.

I keep five months of full images of the server. And my work station, I keep three copies, three months' worth. And I backup my data separately. All the data is on a server and nothing is on the computer.

I backup data daily, five copies of it. Every five days, I overwrite the first one. So I've got five days of data, and three days of images and of the workstation, and five copies of the server image. I do it automated every month and I've never had a problem.

I've used all of them. I've used Norton Ghost, and years and years ago something called FastBack. Norton Ghost is really the only other one, but my experience is there are more problems with using it than Acronis.

Very simple. I can create a backup program in just in minutes because I know the program so well. It is very easy to set up if you know anything about computers, and even if you're not familiar with computers.

It takes me no time at all and the backup procedure is pretty much straightforward, depending on how complicated your system is. 

I'm using the pro version. Personally, I think that the home version is more complicated to set up than the professional version, for some reason. You would think it would be the other way around.

Click Here For a Free 30-Day Fully Functional Trial of Acronis Backup v12.5

Buy it. Simple. It's the best backup. I've used it to restore a number of machines without any trouble at all. It's very simple with a hard drive. It makes it much easier if you have a complete new system.

Live System Imaging – Zero Downtime.

The key for me at the time was allowing my Engineers to have their weekends free vs rotating them through a schedule so that servers were taken offline and imaged during the change window. Post-implementation, this fell to zero and boosted morale by allowing the engineers to enjoy their weekends with their families. In this instance, showing the team that I valued their personal lives and was willing to pay to insure their quality of life resulted in a dedicated team that was thankful and produced more.

This organization also highly mission critical server applications where RTO was very low. We did use Load Balancers and other technologies, but for a catastrophic failure this solution presented an RTO of roughly 1 Hour (depending on the size of the server) although often less. It became routine to run an off cycle image before any major physical server upgrade, thus improving the speed from development to QA to production. Developers could be less leery of major changes knowing that the back-out was quick and reliable.

There can be inconsistencies between builds in terms of the product working with one NIC or another, especially on newer generation servers. Usually downloading the latest bits solved, though. A minor nit, but it’s the only gripe I’ve had to date.

7 Years.

None.

None.

None.

Excellent.

Excellent.

Relatively Straightforward. We needed to create an in house script to purge old images (vs using something like a product retention setting). This may have been corrected in subsequent versions.

In-House.

Somewhat difficult to quantify. The key for me at the time was allowing my Engineers to have their weekends free vs rotating them through a schedule so that servers were taken offline and imaged during the change window. Post-implementation, this fell to zero and boosted morale by allowing the engineers to enjoy their weekends with their families. In this instance, showing the team that I valued their personal lives and was willing to pay to insure their quality of life resulted in a dedicated team that was thankful and produced more.

This organization also highly mission critical server applications where RTO was very low. We did use Load Balancers and other technologies, but for a catastrophic failure this solution presented an RTO of roughly 1 Hour (depending on the size of the server) although often less. It became routine to run an off cycle image before any major physical server upgrade, thus improving the speed from development to QA to production. Developers could be less leery of major changes knowing that the back-out was quick and reliable.

Rough cost at time of implementation was approximately $1200 per managed server. One engineer monitored the job status, spending approximately 15 minutes per day.

No.

Great product, nearly set-and-forget for Server Live Imaging once fully configured.