The tool is very stable. It is a fast solution. It is easy to design the reports.

It is the most popular tool. The product has a good library of models and objects compared to other vendors. The user interface is easy to work with.

One of the most valuable features is how user-friendly ARIS is, compared to other BPM tools. This tool has very diverse types of assets available. ARIS also has a lot of customizable options, different model types, object types, a number of attributes, and a lot of customization is possible. In comparison, Signavio is very limited in terms of model types and object types. So these customizations ARIS offers are really valuable to any client who wants to create a BPM repository. 

The most important feature is ARIS's ability to turn a process design into data to analyze anything you want. For example, we have some analysis reports in ARIS that can guide us when we want to change a system. It shows us how this change will affect all of the organization's processes. That is the most useful part for us. You can define your own meta models in the system by taking something from the out-of-the-box features and customizing it according to your needs. This is another valuable part of the solution. 

It also enables you to publish content to users based on privileges so that a group of people can access content easily and generate their own reports. In terms of user-friendliness, there are three different levels. The first one is the end-user, and it's very user-friendly for them. The second is the web designer part, and that is also user-friendly. The third part is the advanced designer part called ARIS Architect. It has more features, making it a little bit more complex to use and adapt to and a little less intuitive than the other parts.

It's really fast for process design. It's much faster compared to Enterprise Architect. Compared to Blueworks, I would say ARIS has stronger ability to manage enterprise architecture with more details.

Using the well defined architecture/ metamodel, you can create complicated structures, but it's still easily trackable. Also, you can have two kinds of reporting, either for queries or for reporting to reports — some of which are built-in, which makes it more powerful compared to Blueworks.