The solution does not require scalability in terms of hardware. For example, a flow diagram use case is processed that does not need scalability.

The scalability is good because access can be provided to multiple teams.

It is very scalable. I know that it's used for both small and large projects.

As a solution, it's scalable. We are handling a lot of projects via ARD at this moment, I'm taking in a lot of applications. So far, so good.

We have not encountered any stability issues.

It can be scaled up and down per the needs of the organization.

The scale possibilities are endless, especially when combined with all the other products that CA has to offer. If it is a company that has the means to be able to purchase all the pieces together to build a full scale model, then the possibilities are endless.

Did not use in largescale capacity so I can't provide a sufficient evaluation. However, when working with very large models (producing 250,000 scenarios), the ARD performed well and was able to provide meaningful options for test selection in short response time

We are fine in terms of scalability.

I don't see any concerns with scalability. It's really a local install. I don't have any concerns there.

Larger models do require significant time for analysis.

I am not seeing any real issues here. Early on, we had implemented in a way that was not very scalable. We quickly corrected the way we had it implemented. We would love to see it go to a SaaS solution. It is just easier from a procurement and onboarding perspective. However, so far, the scaling has been fine.

I think that it is scalable.

No scalability issues.

We have just started using it. It's simple, but we don't see any issue at this time.

At the beginning they did not have a cost effective way to get a viewer in front of our developers without giving them a copy. Now there is a viewer that addresses that issue.

The scalability is okay.