I rate the stability of Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer a nine out of ten.

The stability is very nice. Up until now we haven't faced any issues.

The product is stable and reliable.

The stability is perfect. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

Version 2.3 is very stable and reliable.

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer is very stable.

It is really stable. The learning curve depends on the talent of the people using it and their skills, but the stability is really good. CA has been great about helping if something goes wrong or breaks but there's not a whole lot of that. 

Did not use in largescale capacity so I can't provide a sufficient evaluation.

It is quite a stable product.

There are some opportunities to improve the stability. The application will often times, if you put your computer to sleep and you open it back up, not be responsive any longer. You'll have to kill it and open it back up. But the good thing is that I've talk with CA about that, and they're actually fixing the issue.

They're very receptive to fixing the product. It's a fairly new, young product.

We haven't encountered issues with stability but we have experienced some problems with our JIRA project, which takes too long to load because of its size.

Stability is good. Any issues that we have had in terms of rollout, the CA team has been there to support us all along the way. All the solutions solved our problems so that has helped a lot to ensure we are using the product right. Where there were gaps, they closed them pretty quickly. We had the CA team and the whole group combined spent a lot of time with us, and they have been really responsive. From that perspective, where there were issues, we have solved them pretty fast.

I haven't actually installed it, so I can’t give you much information about that. But, I've seen that its not able to do some things. For example, you cannot create user stories inside Agile Requirements Designer. We just saw another product where you could drill down to BBD and TDD. And you can actually transform that and create your user stories to be able to do that and this product is lacking that.

I haven’t used it for a very long time. The first version I tried had a lot of bugs. The version I tried in June or July was much more stable.

No stability issues.

In terms of designing, it is very stable, but we are still exploring automation. We just started using the automation feature of ARD.

I have been playing with the solution for a short timeframe, two weeks. So far very good. I haven't tested the scalability of the solution, but so far, I would say very good.

At the beginning. I believe the stability issues have been addressed.

It is pretty new, so together with CA, we improved it over the first half of the year. It was a partner deal, mostly to help them out.