We performed a comparison between ACL Analytics and MEGA HOPEX based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two GRC solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is very flexible and has hundreds of functions."
"It improved my organization using an automated audit revision with scripts."
"Initial setup is straightforward."
"The most valuable feature of ACL Analytics is its powerful data control capabilities."
"The tool's most valuable feature is its ability to import files from other software packages. Its reporting and visualization capabilities have made our reporting easier. Importing results into spreadsheets or other documents for incorporation into reports is particularly helpful."
"I like the fact that in the duplicate section, I can find matches, and I can find situations where certain cells or certain cell points match, but there's a difference as well between two different records."
"The platform is stable."
"The solution itself was easy to use."
"I find the IT portfolio management very valuable and helpful."
"We have many use cases for this solution but the feature I have found most valuable is the IT Portfolio Management module."
"The initial setup was straightforward. With configuration, customizing or prepping the data and deployment, it took about one year to set up. We only needed two people to deploy and maintain the solution: one business architect and someone who specializes in customization and operations."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the reuse of common enterprise components and entities."
"What's most valuable in MEGA HOPEX is that it follows the reference model where each component is defined. I also like the diagram consistency in MEGA HOPEX."
"An advantage is its accessibility."
"The ease of use could be better."
"The product's pricing has increased over the years."
"Reporting and presentation of information directly to solutions, such as PowerPoint."
"It would be beneficial if the software could improve its capabilities when extracting data from databases, particularly for those who may not be familiar with SQL queries."
"The interface must be improved."
"The solution is quite expensive."
"Standardization is lacking. The Operational Risk Function will be more effective if it at a default level follows established Basel standards for Loss categorization, Risk Assessments, Risk Event categorization, etc."
"It would be great if this solution could integrate with other tools such as ITSM (ServiceNow) or CMDB."
"The solution lacks additional models compared to other tools."
"Needs a friendlier import/export to other modeling tools."
"The training materials and learning process need improvement."
"I cannot recall coming across any missing features."
ACL Analytics is ranked 6th in GRC with 5 reviews while MEGA HOPEX is ranked 4th in GRC with 36 reviews. ACL Analytics is rated 9.4, while MEGA HOPEX is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of ACL Analytics writes "Helps to find matches and also the situations where certain cell points match, but there's a difference between two different records". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MEGA HOPEX writes "Easy to use and robust with good features". ACL Analytics is most compared with Galvanize HighBond, SAS Enterprise GRC, RSA Archer and Workiva Wdesk, whereas MEGA HOPEX is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, LeanIX, ARIS BPA, Avolution ABACUS and Visio. See our ACL Analytics vs. MEGA HOPEX report.
See our list of best GRC vendors.
We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
