We performed a comparison between AgilePoint and Microsoft Power Apps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."AgilePoint's most valuable feature is process management."
"AgilePoint has improved our organization by making form implementation easier and to plan for future growth."
"I like the design and the integration capacity. It's also easy to use."
"The initial setup of AgilePoint was very easy."
"The solution's workflows are its most useful feature."
"When I am developing any user UI, it gives me complete flexibility. I can manage in any way I want."
"We like that this solution allows us to fully define our test environments, and link them using different code. This means we can do different tests, but with one basic structure, and then export the data and use it in other platforms."
"It offers integration with several Microsoft products, including SharePoint and Outlook, in my opinion, is a huge plus."
"The features I find the most valuable are the 365 and Microsoft applications integrations and the automation."
"Microsoft PowerApps allows you to simplify business processes and user experience. You can also create responsive applications and canvas apps through this solution. It's an easy to scale, stable, and low-code solution."
"It’s a stable product."
"For all no-code platforms that let you create a front end, you can click together something very quick."
"When compared with Microsoft Power Automate, it is a bit more mature, and we're able to build things pretty rapidly."
"While the platform is good and it has a lot of options, I would like to see more alternative features in future versions such as connectors to IDM. Currently, they have only ADFS and Okta."
"It could be more flexible, but it's already a good solution for the designer."
"Some issues with AgilePoint's design, AI and UX are some of the major problems we deal with when handling our company's business models or processes."
"They should add more information about functionality."
"The solution should be able to support Docker. This would help make scalability easier."
"The scalability of the solution could improve."
"We would like to see the period for viewing executions within this solution to be extended beyond its current limit of 28 days. We would prefer to be able to offer our customers an infinite amount of history to search."
"PowerApps is still a bit new compared to a slightly more mature product such as OutSystems."
"It would be good if this solution supports standard BPN operations. We are thinking of switching to a BPM solution next year because it is not a BPM solution."
"The notion people have is that no code equals no knowledge, and that's simply not true. Even though you don't have to write codes, you still have to know what you're doing."
"The portal and canvas apps need to be improved and brought up to speed."
"The stability of this solution could be better."
"Installation and integration could be improved."
AgilePoint is ranked 22nd in Rapid Application Development Software with 5 reviews while Microsoft Power Apps is ranked 1st in Rapid Application Development Software with 77 reviews. AgilePoint is rated 8.0, while Microsoft Power Apps is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of AgilePoint writes " An affordable tool to create workflows requiring an easy initial setup phase". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Power Apps writes "Low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower". AgilePoint is most compared with Mendix, OutSystems, Nintex Process Platform, IBM BPM and Camunda, whereas Microsoft Power Apps is most compared with Mendix, Oracle Application Express (APEX), ServiceNow, Appian and OutSystems. See our AgilePoint vs. Microsoft Power Apps report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.