We performed a comparison between Agiloft Workflow and BPM and Appian based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."It's very safe. It has a high degree of security, much better than many other solutions I have researched."
"The tech support is quite good."
"Since implementing we have had a faster time to solution, with fewer resources needed."
"In terms of interface, it's very good. In terms of infrastructure, it's amazing and already using multiple tools behind the scenes. It's a low-code platform, so it's very easy to implement."
"The initial setup was seamless. We didn't run into any hardships at all."
"Recently, we added Appian Process Mining, Appian Portals, and now Appian RPA."
"Technical support is quite responsive."
"It has good integrations. We were looking for out-of-the-box integration with both on-prem and publicly accessible data sources. We needed integration with the cloud, OData, our REST API feed, and then on-prem passthrough to go to a SQL database or on-prem APIs through Azure local deployment, etc."
"Write to Data Store Entity - Saving data in SQL databases is done easily using entities. Entities (CDTs in Appian terminology) define relationships and target schema tables via XSD files."
"Agiloft does not have a good user interface."
"There should be more flexibility for the developers to choose the look and feel of the UI. They should have a better ability to design their widgets and customize them with different colors, shapes, and sizes. That is a limitation that could be improved upon."
"Appian has a few areas for improvement, which my organization raised with the Appian team. One is the Excel output which is limited to fifty columns when it should be up to two hundred or three hundred columns."
"My only request is that they decrease the license costs."
"The solution could use some more tutorials to help brand new users figure out how to use the product effectively."
"The reporting is not as good as in similar products. They could also improve the dashboards."
"If we could calculate the amount of data that will be realized, it would help us a lot."
"Lacks integration with other products."
"There are some restrictions with respect to using external components within Appian. So, for example, if we do not have a particular feature available, there's a long cycle of getting approvals and all of that. That does not offer flexibility, which definitely can be improved on."
Earn 20 points
Agiloft Workflow and BPM is ranked 45th in Business Process Management (BPM) while Appian is ranked 4th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 57 reviews. Agiloft Workflow and BPM is rated 9.0, while Appian is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Agiloft Workflow and BPM writes "Easy to use with a high degree of security and excellent flexibility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Appian writes "Low resource consumption, easy setup, and stable". Agiloft Workflow and BPM is most compared with , whereas Appian is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, OutSystems, Camunda, ServiceNow and Pega BPM.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.