Appian Competitors and Alternatives

Get our free report covering Pega, ServiceNow, camunda, and other competitors of Appian. Updated: December 2019.
390,245 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Read reviews of Appian competitors and alternatives

Mallik Kesavaraju
Consultant
Associate Director at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Mar 18 2018

What is most valuable?

I think it is the user interface and the ease of developing the workflow for an application. It has a lot of gadgets to just plug and play, and that cuts down your… more»

How has it helped my organization?

It cuts down the time taken for coding. Earlier it used take for us four hours to do a particular code. Now this can be done in less than 30 minutes. That's the kind of… more»

What needs improvement?

The biggest thing I have seen is when going from one version to another and upgrading to the latest version, it takes a pretty long time for an organization to go through… more»

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

They have both on-premise and cloud licensing. If you are a small to medium company, go for the cloud option because that eliminates a lot of the setting up of your… more»

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I was working with various other products like Savvion BPM and IBM VPN. Because some of the customer situations, we switched them from those applications to Pega, and I… more»

What other advice do I have?

You really need to know how you are going to use this product. Is it for customer service? Is it for marketing? Is it for robotic automation? Is it for other things? You… more»

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We evaluated IBM BPM and Appian.
SaiedKhani
Real User
ERP Functional Specialist at Aryasasol
Oct 17 2019

What is most valuable?

The most useful feature for me is using Bonita as part of my modeling process. I use Bizagi and Bonita together to create the process, pages, and forms.

What needs improvement?

In my experience, the response with the desktop application and the mobile application lag a bit and the product needs to improve in that way. I should be able to type the text — for example, type the CSS — and the code should generate… more»

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Really I use two products at the same time for business process management. I think Bizagi is a powerful software or tool for organization, but Bonita is user-friendly and easy-to-use — easier to use for development. Bizagi has a lot of… more»

What other advice do I have?

On a scale from one to ten where ten is the best, based on my experience, I would give it an eight. It is not a ten because it needs to improve in feature availability.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

For my R&D, I used trial versions to compare Bonita with the other BPMs like Bigazi, Appian, BPM Anywhere and Oracle Suite. After comparisons, I chose Bonita for my application because it was easy-to-use.
Andres Murillo
Real User
Innovation Director at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees
Jan 09 2019

What do you think of Camunda BPM?

What is our primary use case?

This solution enables the development team to quickly create prototypes and put them into production.

What needs improvement?

If Camunda could develop something that creates user forms that would be a great feature to have. They also need to improve the UI.

For how long have I used the solution?

Less than one year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is extremely stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It is very scalable and it scales horizontally. You can basically automate every single process in the company.

How are customer service and technical support?

We have not used tech support yet. 

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We did not use a prior solution to this…
Get our free report covering Pega, ServiceNow, camunda, and other competitors of Appian. Updated: December 2019.
390,245 professionals have used our research since 2012.