Alteryx Designer vs Tungsten RPA comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Alteryx Logo
7,954 views|6,577 comparisons
96% willing to recommend
Tungsten Automation Logo
3,147 views|2,345 comparisons
82% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Alteryx Designer and Tungsten RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Alteryx Designer vs. Tungsten RPA Report (Updated: May 2023).
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The product is intuitive and easy to use.""The most valuable features are the integrated properties and integrated connectivity.""The product offers very good analytics.""Alteryx Designer's user interface is great, as it is very user-friendly.""The functionality of drag and drop is the most valuable. It is a very user-friendly tool that can be understood easily. My teams also work with other solutions, such as Integration Services, and these solutions are very difficult for people who don't have technical knowledge.""It has an easy setup process.""Alteryx Designer is easier to use for machine learning models. However, I am not very good at Python scripts which you will need to make the machine learning scripts.""The most valuable feature of Alteryx Designer is its ability to select all the inputs and formulas."

More Alteryx Designer Pros →

"The drag and drop functionality is quite good.""The best part of Kofax is that they have a whole concept. It's one product, but also has extra elements that can be integrated.""It is stable and scalable.""It is very simple and easy to learn compared to any other RPA tools such as UiPath, Automation Anywhere and Blue Prism.""The pricing of the solution is quite good.""The flexibility to use already-developed components is really good. You can use it for Excel-related operations and other things.""The product saves time and resources.""The most valuable feature of Kofax RPA is the simplicity of automating tasks."

More Tungsten RPA Pros →

Cons
"It would be simpler if they provided a component where you could simply enter some parameters and see the results.""I would like to be able to include small snippets of code inside of the solution. The tool has only drag-and-drop features to make it easy to use, but sometimes I feel like this makes it more complicated.""The product could offer more connectors and more databases with support for the in-database function.""Alteryx Designer's cost should be improved.""It is challenging to view the data using Alteryx Designer.""Based on my experience, the tool could be improved by providing sample reports or pre-configured workflows tailored to specific industries, like finance. It needs to integrate an AI chatbot as well.""An improvement for Alteryx Designer would be faster bug fixes and updates.""The only thing is sometimes it can be a bit slow."

More Alteryx Designer Cons →

"I'd like to see a recording function and a more simple interface.""Kofax RPA could improve web-based automation and there should be a choice of what browser we can use, such as Google Chrome, instead of an inbuilt browser from Kofax RPA. Additionally, Kofax RPA is missing an orchestrator that other solutions have, such as UiPath.""The product should improve desktop automation, which is hard to configure. It needs to have custom connectors. It is the only advantage that Microsoft Power Platform has over Kofax RPA. It has more than 800 custom connectors.""This product has room for improvement in support of aviation. The interface could be improved in the next release.""Kofax RPA needs to improve integration with SAP and Microsoft. The professional services offered by the tool's team is below par. Its licensing needs to be more modular.""Its documentation is not widely available on the web. They should work on the availability of its documentation. In Automation Anywhere, there is a feature called Discovery Bot that automatically records the process steps and suggests a possible bot. I am not sure if such a feature is available in Kofax. If it is not available, it will be very good to have this feature. ""RPA technology is constantly changing, and sometimes Kofax lags behind.""The process discovery could be a bit better."

More Tungsten RPA Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is too expensive for our country. We are a small country, so it is too difficult to sell this solution. With Alteryx Designer, if you want to automate the data and run the flows, you have to pay more money. We were trying to automate the flows, and we found out that people have to pay 600 more for this feature, which makes it even more expensive. We are a partner for Tableau, and we are working with Tableau Prep, which is like a mini Alteryx. In Tableau Prep, you can drag and drop and make new connections with the different data sources. You can make all the connections. You can also publish a source. You don't have to pay more money with Tableau. You pay like $5 per user per month to access it."
  • "Alteryx is a little bit expensive compared to competing solutions."
  • "Alteryx Designer is an expensive solution."
  • "I rate Alteryx Designer a six out of ten for pricing."
  • "The licenses are expensive, making it difficult to consider acquiring additional licenses to the existing ones."
  • "Each license is something like $4,000."
  • "I rate the price of Alteryx Designer as a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is extremely expensive, and ten is a highly cheap product."
  • "I rate the price of Alteryx Designer a ten on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."
  • More Alteryx Designer Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The normal price for an on-premises license is €50,000. That's the price for one robot license. You can have more than one robot license but only one can be run at any one time. I believe the cost of adding a second robot is around €14,000."
  • "Price is not a problem, because they are a competitor and we have a special rate."
  • "I don't have complete insight at this point in time, but I would guess that Kofax is a lot less expensive than Automation Anywhere. I would expect its license to be on a yearly basis."
  • "Its pricing is reasonable given the product capabilities. Kofax has a wide range of products, and it can sometimes be confusing to understand which capabilities come with which product set. One of the key facets that we've been looking into recently is cognitive document recognition that was a core pile of some of their other technologies such as Kofax transformation modules (KTM)."
  • "Kofax's prices are pretty reasonable."
  • "There is a standard license needed to use Kofax RPA and the price is reasonable."
  • "Kofax RPA is moderately priced but expensive in comparison to UiPath and Power Automate."
  • "I give the price of the solution a six out of ten."
  • More Tungsten RPA Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:For my daily analytics needs, the entire Alteryx Designer platform is beneficial.
    Top Answer:I would rate the pricing of Alteryx Designer as an eight out of ten in terms of costliness. Licensing costs vary based on negotiation and increase with the number of licenses needed. There are no… more »
    Top Answer:While Alteryx Designer is a great product overall, its cost can sometimes be a drawback.
    Top Answer:You can automate browsing tasks without needing a server connection. The platform provides its browser, allowing you to run anything inside it.
    Top Answer:Previously, Tungsten RPA offered perpetual licenses, but now it has a subscription-based model for more flexibility, similar to the Microsoft developer platform.
    Top Answer:Tungsten RPA features enhanced desktop automation capabilities, improved Active Directory integration, and upgraded recorder functionality. These updates will be available in the upcoming release… more »
    Ranking
    9th
    out of 101 in Data Integration
    Views
    7,954
    Comparisons
    6,577
    Reviews
    20
    Average Words per Review
    423
    Rating
    7.8
    Views
    3,147
    Comparisons
    2,345
    Reviews
    11
    Average Words per Review
    429
    Rating
    7.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Kofax RPA, Kofax Kapow, Kapow
    Learn More
    Overview

    Tungsten RPA offers an efficient solution for streamlining business processes through Robotic Process Automation (RPA), which utilizes software "bots" to automate tasks like data entry and form filling. With Tungsten RPA, organizations can enjoy increased efficiency as repetitive tasks are automated, freeing up human resources for more strategic work. Moreover, the software ensures improved accuracy by performing tasks consistently and error-free, leading to reduced costs and enhanced compliance with regulations. Key features include a low-code design environment for easy workflow creation, intelligent document processing for handling unstructured data, automated process discovery, and flexible deployment options suitable for on-premises, cloud, or hybrid environments. Tungsten RPA presents a comprehensive solution for optimizing operational efficiency and driving business success through automation.
    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Aetna, BNP Paribas, Citi, Goldman Sachs, HSBC, ING, Aviva, Humana, Willis, Merck, University Hospitals, CardinalHealth, American Red Cross, Alegri, Capita
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company33%
    Financial Services Firm27%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Non Profit7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization19%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Computer Software Company6%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Energy/Utilities Company15%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Logistics Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business44%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise44%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise24%
    Large Enterprise64%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise4%
    Large Enterprise61%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Alteryx Designer vs. Tungsten RPA
    May 2023
    Find out what your peers are saying about Alteryx Designer vs. Tungsten RPA and other solutions. Updated: May 2023.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Alteryx Designer is ranked 9th in Data Integration with 27 reviews while Tungsten RPA is ranked 12th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 24 reviews. Alteryx Designer is rated 8.0, while Tungsten RPA is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Alteryx Designer writes "An easy-to-use automation solution with satisfying customer support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tungsten RPA writes "A stable product that provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems". Alteryx Designer is most compared with Azure Data Factory, FME, Informatica PowerCenter, SSIS and Palantir Foundry, whereas Tungsten RPA is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA) and SAS Data Management. See our Alteryx Designer vs. Tungsten RPA report.

    We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.