We performed a comparison between Amazon API Gateway and webMethods.io Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is a managed service and requires minimal configuration, which makes it easy to launch an API."
"API Gateway offers a multitude of configuration parameters that enable versatile request filtering and protection against potential attacks."
"Integrating API Gateway with other AWS services was easy. It worked out of the box, so it worked perfectly."
"It is easy to set up. It is also quick to deploy."
"The solution is solid, robust, and scalable."
"Amazon stack is easy to use in combination with other Amazon services, so it was a logical continuity."
"It's easy to integrate and provide support for existing AWS services if I use the AWS API gateway."
"In terms of most valuable features, it would say that it is really easy to start working with it."
"Oracle's self-service capabilities, of which we make extensive use, is the most valuable feature."
"There's hardware, software and application integration, providing hosting flexibility."
"I like the tool's scalability."
"Our use case is for integration factory for SAP. It is mostly for SAP integration."
"It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals."
"The solution is scalable."
"The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product."
"The tool's UI requires time to understand."
"I believe better governance and monitoring features would be beneficial."
"Monitoring could be improved."
"The user interface could be improved, as well as customer support and having a local customer representative in a country."
"I am not completely satisfied with Technical Support."
"The user interface, in general, can be better. The user interface for the entire Amazon cloud can be more friendly. There are some scenarios that are not really easy to manage and configure through the user interface."
"The integration could be improved."
"It's hard to configure. There's a lot of options but it's very hard, it's very confusing."
"It is difficult to maintain."
"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."
"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The solution's release management feature could be better."
"I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier."
"The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols."
"webMethods.io Integration's installation is complex. It should also improve integration and connectors."
Amazon API Gateway is ranked 3rd in API Management with 37 reviews while webMethods.io Integration is ranked 29th in API Management with 7 reviews. Amazon API Gateway is rated 8.2, while webMethods.io Integration is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Amazon API Gateway writes "Easy initial setup and highly stable solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io Integration writes "Though the tool provides great connectivity functionality, it needs to be made more stable". Amazon API Gateway is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager, Apigee and WSO2 API Manager, whereas webMethods.io Integration is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, SAP Cloud Platform, Apigee, Microsoft Azure API Management and webMethods API Gateway. See our Amazon API Gateway vs. webMethods.io Integration report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
