We performed a comparison between webMethods Integration Server and webMethods.io Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I feel comfortable using this product with its ease of building interfaces for developers. This is a better integration tool for integrating with various applications like Oracle, Salesforce, mainframes, etc. It works fine in the integration of legacy software as well."
"The solution's ease-of-use is its most valuable feature, in which complex issues may be resolved."
"A product with good API and EDI components."
"One [of the most valuable features] is the webMethods Designer. That helps our developers develop on their own. It's very intuitive for design. It helps our developers to speed the development of services for the integrations."
"High throughput and excellent scalability."
"We needed a tool that was able to orchestrate and help us configure our APIs so that we could maintain and see the heartbeat, traffic, trends, etc."
"The stability is good."
"webMethods platform is used to build an EAI platform, enabling communication between many internal systems and third-party operators."
"It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals."
"I like the tool's scalability."
"Our use case is for integration factory for SAP. It is mostly for SAP integration."
"There's hardware, software and application integration, providing hosting flexibility."
"Oracle's self-service capabilities, of which we make extensive use, is the most valuable feature."
"The solution is scalable."
"The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product."
"A while ago, they were hacked, and it took them a very long time to open their website again in order to download any service packs or any features. I don't know what they could do differently. I know that they were vulnerable, and there was some downtime, but because they were down, we were unable to download any potential service packs."
"Version control is not very easy. The packages and the integration server are on Eclipse IDE, but you can't compare the code from the IDE. For example, if you are working on Java code, doing version control and deployment for a quick comparison between the code isn't easy. Some tools or plug-ins are there, such as CrossVista, and you can also play with an SVN server where you have to place your package, and from there, you can check, but you have to do that as a separate exercise. You can't do it from the IDE or webMethods server. You can't just right-click and upload your service."
"Large file handling is pretty hard comparatively to other middleware tools."
"The price should be reduced to make it more affordable."
"The logging capability has room for improvement. That way, we could keep a history of all the transactions. It would be helpful to be able to get to that without having to build a standalone solution to do so."
"I would like to see the price improve."
"There should be better logging, or a better dashboard, to allow you to see see the logs of the services."
"The learning curve is a little steep at first."
"webMethods.io Integration's installation is complex. It should also improve integration and connectors."
"I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier."
"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."
"It is difficult to maintain."
"The solution's release management feature could be better."
"The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews while webMethods.io Integration is ranked 22nd in Cloud Data Integration with 7 reviews. webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0, while webMethods.io Integration is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io Integration writes "Though the tool provides great connectivity functionality, it needs to be made more stable". webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks, Boomi AtomSphere Integration and Oracle Service Bus, whereas webMethods.io Integration is most compared with SAP Cloud Platform, Apigee, Microsoft Azure API Management, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and Amazon API Gateway. See our webMethods Integration Server vs. webMethods.io Integration report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.